Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 272-940-1 | CAS number: 68921-45-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Not specified
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data taken from HPV Challenge Program website from which data have been entered into the HPVIS: January 15, 2002 (original submission), October 23, 2004 and January 19, 2007.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1035 (Mysid Acute Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see below.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The methodology as stated in the OECD SIDS documentation is listed as "OECD Guideline 471; B14 in EC Directive 92/69/EEC". This appears to be a typographical error in the data set, as this methodology relates to the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay. As such, it is assumed given the location of the study laboratory conducting the test, and the methodology followed, that the method is the US method for Mysid Acute Toxicity testing. This is therefore detailed above as the appropriate method.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
Not applicable. - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Nominal and Measured Concentrations: 0, 1.3, 2.2, 3.6, 6, and 10 mg/l
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Solutions of the test material were prepared by dilution with sea water. After mixing and allowing undissolved material to settle, the water soluble faction was added to two corresponding replicate test vessels.
- Test organisms (species):
- other:
- Details on test organisms:
- No further data specified within the report.
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No post exposure period specified within the report.
- Hardness:
- Not specified.
- Test temperature:
- Not specified.
- pH:
- Not specified.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Not specified.
- Salinity:
- Not specified
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Not specified.
- Details on test conditions:
- Test Type: Flow-through
Test Vessel: No Data
Water Media Type: Saltwater
Test Concentrations: Unknown
Nominal and Measured Concentrations: 0, 1.3, 2.2, 3.6, 6, and 10 mg/l
Exposure Period: 96 Hours
Two control vessels were established containing the same dilution water but no test material. The test concentrations 0, 1.3, 2.2, 3.6, 6, and 10 mg/l were selected based on preliminary test results. Mysids then were added to the test and control vessels. Test organisms were carefully transferred into the appropriate concentrations of newly prepared vessels at the 24, 48, and 72 hour observation periods. In life observations and water analyses were conducted at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours. - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- < 1.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Details on results:
- Following 96-hours of exposure, 60-100% mortality was observed in the three highest concentrations, and 25 and 40% mortality was observed in the two lowest concentrations. The 96-hour LC50 was determined to be 2.3 mg/l (1.3-10 mg/l; 95% confidence limits. The 96-hour NOEC was < 1.3 mg/l.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Not specified.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 96-hour LC50 was determined to be 2.3 mg/l. The 96-hour NOEC was < 1.3 mg/l.
- Executive summary:
Data taken from HPV Challenge Program website from which data have been entered into the HPVIS: January 15, 2002 (original submission), October 23, 2004 and January 19, 2007.
Following 96-hours of exposure, 60-100% mortality was observed in the three highest concentrations, and 25 and 40% mortality was observed in the two lowest concentrations. The 96-hour LC50 was determined to be 2.3 mg/l (1.3-10 mg/l; 95% confidence limits. The 96-hour NOEC was < 1.3 mg/l.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not specified
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1035 (Mysid Acute Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Melting point: <0 °C
- Boiling point: 258 °C
- Vapour pressure: Not measured
- Water solubility (under test conditions): Not measured
OTHER PROPERTIES (if relevant for this endpoint)
- Results of test for ready biodegradability: 8 % after 28 day
- Other: - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Test Levels: Control, 150, 250, 400, 600 and 1,000 mg/L nominal test concentrations.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- The test was conducted using the water accommodated fraction (WAF) of nominal test concentrations. Individual WAFs were prepared by adding a measured weight of test material to a measured volume of dilution water (1-L) in a glass vessel and stirring for 24 hours. Following the mixing period, the test solutions were allowed to stand for 1 hour before the water phase was siphoned off. The siphoned water phase (i.e., WAF) was used for the aquatic toxicity test.
- Test organisms (species):
- Americamysis bahia (previous name: Mysidopsis bahia)
- Details on test organisms:
- Test species: Juvenile mysids less than 24-hours old were produced from laboratory in-house culture.
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No post exposure observation period specified.
- Hardness:
- Not specified
- Test temperature:
- Test Temperature (ºC) - 24 + 1
- pH:
- pH - 8.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- TOC - 3.9 to 8.2
- Salinity:
- Water was adjusted to a salinity of 20 parts per thousand and aerated
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations
- Details on test conditions:
- A 2-L glass beaker that contained 1 L of test solution was used per treatment. The test vessels were loosely covered to reduce entry of dust, etc. Mysids were fed newly hatched Artemia salina nauplii once or twice daily during the test.
Dilution water: Seawater collected from the Atlantic Ocean in Hampton, New Hampshire was used. Water was adjusted to a salinity of 20 parts per thousand and aerated.
Water was free of pesticides and PCBs at the detection limit.
The WAF was used for testing. 10 mysids per test vessel (2 replicates per test concentration were used). - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 250 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 733 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- Mysids exposed to 600 mg/L were lethargic and exhibited erratic swimming from 48 to 96 hours. No other sub lethal effects were observed in any test vessel during the 96 hour exposure. Effect concentrations based on nominal loading rates.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Control response was satisfactory (>90% survival and no sublethal effects).
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EL50’s were calculated using standard statistical methods from Stephan (1983).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOEC: c = 250 mg/l
EC50: c = 733 mg/l - Executive summary:
Study conducted to OECD test guidelines in compliance with GLP.Results: Effect concentrations based on nominal loading rates. Control response was satisfactory (>90% survival and no sublethal effects). Mysids exposed to 600 mg/L were lethargic and exhibited erratic swimming from 48 to 96 hours. No other sub lethal effects were observed in any test vessel during the 96 hour exposure. NOEC: c = 250 mg/l
EC50: c = 733 mg/l
Read across to supporting substance, CAS No. 36878 -20 -3 by structural analogue.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not specified
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study, which is rated as reliability 2 because it is a read-across study.
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to IUCLID Section 13 for the read-across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1035 (Mysid Acute Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Melting point: <0 °C
- Boiling point: 258 °C
- Vapour pressure: Not measured
- Water solubility (under test conditions): Not measured
OTHER PROPERTIES (if relevant for this endpoint)
- Results of test for ready biodegradability: 8 % after 28 day
- Other: - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Test Levels: Control, 150, 250, 400, 600 and 1,000 mg/L nominal test concentrations.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- The test was conducted using the water accommodated fraction (WAF) of nominal test concentrations. Individual WAFs were prepared by adding a measured weight of test material to a measured volume of dilution water (1-L) in a glass vessel and stirring for 24 hours. Following the mixing period, the test solutions were allowed to stand for 1 hour before the water phase was siphoned off. The siphoned water phase (i.e., WAF) was used for the aquatic toxicity test.
- Test organisms (species):
- Americamysis bahia (previous name: Mysidopsis bahia)
- Details on test organisms:
- Test species: Juvenile mysids less than 24-hours old were produced from laboratory in-house culture.
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No post exposure observation period specified.
- Hardness:
- Not specified
- Test temperature:
- Test Temperature (ºC) - 24 + 1
- pH:
- pH - 8.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- TOC - 3.9 to 8.2
- Salinity:
- Water was adjusted to a salinity of 20 parts per thousand and aerated
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations
- Details on test conditions:
- A 2-L glass beaker that contained 1 L of test solution was used per treatment. The test vessels were loosely covered to reduce entry of dust, etc. Mysids were fed newly hatched Artemia salina nauplii once or twice daily during the test.
Dilution water: Seawater collected from the Atlantic Ocean in Hampton, New Hampshire was used. Water was adjusted to a salinity of 20 parts per thousand and aerated.
Water was free of pesticides and PCBs at the detection limit.
The WAF was used for testing. 10 mysids per test vessel (2 replicates per test concentration were used). - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 250 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 733 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- Mysids exposed to 600 mg/L were lethargic and exhibited erratic swimming from 48 to 96 hours. No other sub lethal effects were observed in any test vessel during the 96 hour exposure. Effect concentrations based on nominal loading rates.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Control response was satisfactory (>90% survival and no sublethal effects).
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EL50’s were calculated using standard statistical methods from Stephan (1983).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOEC: c = 250 mg/l
EC50: c = 733 mg/l - Executive summary:
Study conducted to OECD test guidelines in compliance with GLP.Results: Effect concentrations based on nominal loading rates. Control response was satisfactory (>90% survival and no sublethal effects). Mysids exposed to 600 mg/L were lethargic and exhibited erratic swimming from 48 to 96 hours. No other sub lethal effects were observed in any test vessel during the 96 hour exposure. NOEC: c = 250 mg/l
EC50: c = 733 mg/l
Read across to supporting substance, CAS No. 36878 -20 -3 by structural analogue.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Assessment of acute toxicity to aquatic invertebrates.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Marine water invertebrates
Marine water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 2.3 mg/L
Additional information
ANNEX XI - General Rules for Adaptation of the Standard Testing Regime set out in Annexes VII to X, Section 1. “Testing Does Not Appear Scientifically Necessary”, paragraph 1.1.2 states that:
Data shall be considered to be equivalent to data generated by the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3) if the following conditions are met:
1) adequacy for the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment;
2) adequate and reliable coverage of the key parameters foreseen to be investigated in the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3);
3) exposure duration comparable to or longer than the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3) if exposure duration is a relevant parameter; and
4) adequate and reliable documentation of the study is provided.
The substancehas been supported under Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program. The American Chemical Councils RAPA Panel, has derived a “Substituted Diphenylamines” category of chemicals, and assessed all available data. To address the acute toxicity to aquatic invertebrates, two saltwater toxicity tests, using mysid shrimp are available; one on the substance itself, and one on a close structural analogue. The results of these are as follows:
CAS 68921-45-9: 96-h LC50 : 2.3 mg/l (1.3-10 mg/l; 95% confidence limits). 96-h NOEC < 1.3 mg/l.
CAS No. 36878-20-3: 96 h EC50: c = 733 mg/l ; 96-h NOEC: c = 250 mg/l (WAF).
It is noted that the preferred study to address this endpoint utilises freshwater daphnia. However, the available data on saltwater species is considered appropriate to address the requirements of Annex XI, Para 1.1.2 as follows:
1) adequacy for the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment;
The two results available are somewhat different; this is attributed to the dosing methods seen in the experiments. For the purposes of hazard assessment, the value on the substance itself it taken as appropriate, and classification and labelling is applied on this basis. This is therefore considered adequate for risk assessment.
2) adequate and reliable coverage of the key parameters foreseen to be investigated in the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3);
The studies are GLP compliant studies, conducted to recent guidelines. The integrity and results are therefore considered appropriate and are in accordance with the recognised guidelines. There is no documented evidence that saltwater species are more sensitive than freshwater species, although the REACH guidance attributes and additional assessment factor of 10 for risk characterisation calculations.
3) exposure duration comparable to or longer than the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3) if exposure duration is a relevant parameter; and
The exposure duration of the study is in accordance with the guideline method at 96 hours. This is longer than the required 48 hour exposure utilised in the acute toxicity to Daphnia study.
4) adequate and reliable documentation of the study is provided.
The studies are GLP compliant studies, and have been peer reviewed and evaluated in the context of the OECD SIDS and US HP programme. The results are presented as appropriate summaries of the original reports.
The use of these studies results in classification and labelling under the CLP-Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as follows:
Aquatic Chronic Category 2
H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.