Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-213-6 | CAS number: 93-04-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from experimental study report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion Study of “Methyl 2- naphthyl ether ” was performed in Rabbits
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- EC Number:
- 202-213-6
- EC Name:
- Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- Cas Number:
- 93-04-9
- Molecular formula:
- C11H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methoxynaphthalene
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- Molecular formula :C11H10O
- Molecular weight :158.19 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- Molecular formula :C11H10O
- Molecular weight :158.19 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: LIVEON BIOLABS PVT. LTD
- Age at study initiation: 3 to 4 Months (Approximately)
- Weight at study initiation: Minimum: 1.710 kg and Maximum: 2.276 kg (Prior to Treatment)
- Housing:
Husbandry : The animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages.
Room Sanitation : The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
Cages and water bottle : All the cages and water bottles were changed minimum twice a week
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): All animals were provided conventional laboratory rabbit diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Rabbits were acclimatised to the test conditions for a period of 7 days (Animal No.-1) and 9 days (Animal No. 2 and 3) prior to the application of the test item
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Minimum: 18.90 °C Maximum: 22.70 °C
- Humidity (%): Minimum: 48.30 % Maximum: 68.30 %
- Air changes (per hr): More than 12 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12:12
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100mg (0.1 g) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 hr
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- No data available
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three female rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): normal saline
- Time after start of exposure: no data
SCORING SYSTEM: Grading of irritation lesions was carried out as per draize method
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: ophthalmoscope
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Animal 1,2 and 3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days observation period
- Remarks on result:
- other: irritating
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Animal 1,2 and3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days observation period
- Remarks on result:
- other: Irritating
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal 1,2 and 3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hours
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days observation period
- Remarks on result:
- other: Irritating
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Animal 1, 2 and 3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hours
- Score:
- 1 - 1.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days observation period
- Remarks on result:
- other: Irritaing
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Observation at 1 hour after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation at 24 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in animal no. 1 and 3 whereas obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids was seen in animal no 2.
At 24 hours observation the rabbits were examined for corneal epithelium cell damage using sodium fluorescein strips and noticed 40%, 50% and 40% damage in animal no. 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Observation at 48 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible in animal no. 3; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in animal no. 1 and 2 whereas obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids in animal no. 3.
Observation at 72 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 7 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae- Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in animal no.1 and diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible was observed in animal no. 2 and 3; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 14 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in animal no. 1 and 2 whereas no ulceration or opacity was seen in animal no. 3; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in animals no. 1 and 2 whereas zero was seen in animal no. 3; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 21 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Blood vessels normal in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (Normal) in all the animals.
The individual mean score for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 at 24, 48, 72 hours for corneal opacity, iris, conjunctiva and chemosis were found 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.00; 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.33, and 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.33, respectively - Other effects:
- Clinical Observation
No systemic toxicity was observed in treated rabbits during the experimental period.
Mortality
No mortality was observed during the observation period.
Body weight
Body weights were increased as compared to day 0 in all the three animals.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 : Individual Animal Eye Irritation Scores
Treated Dose:100 mg of test item Sex:Female
Animal Number |
1 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Right |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
40 |
Animal Number |
2 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Right |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
50 |
Animal Numbers |
3 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Right |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
40 |
Key:*= Pre-treatment eye examination.
Untreated Control Sex:Female
Animal Number |
1 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Left |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
0 |
Animal Number |
2 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Left |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
0 |
Animal Number |
3 |
|||||||
Application Side |
Left |
|||||||
Eye Reactions |
* |
Hour(s) |
Day |
|||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
||
Cornea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Corneal Damage (%) |
0 |
Key:*= Pre-treatment eye examination.
Table 1 Continued…
Eye Irritation Scores - Mean Values after 24, 48, 72 Hours (Treated eye)
Animal No. Eye Reaction |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Corneal Opacity |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Iris |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Conjunctiva |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Chemosis |
1.00 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
Formula :
Mean Eye Irritation Score =
Sum of the Individual Animal Score for eye reactionat24, 48 and 72 hours
Number of the Observations (3)
Table 2 : Individual AnimalClinicalSigns
Sex:Female
Animal No. |
Days (Post application observation) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Key:1 = Normal
Table 3: Individual Animal Body Weight
Sex :Female
Animal No. |
Animal Body Weight (kg) |
|
Prior to application |
At termination |
|
1 |
1.728 |
2.142 |
2 |
2.276 |
2.616 |
3 |
1.710 |
1.894 |
Key:kg = Kilogram
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2A (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- All the three animals were fully reversible within an observation period of 21 days. Hence under the experimental test conditions,Methyl 2-naphthyl ether was considered to be irritating to New Zealand White Female rabbit eyes .
- Executive summary:
Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion Study of Methyl 2-naphthyl ether was performed as per OECD guideline no. 405. Rabbits free from injury of eye were selected for the study. The eyes of all the rabbits were examined 24 hours prior to treatment. One eye of each rabbit served as control and other as treated. Control eye was left untreated. 0.1 g of test item was instilled in the other (treated) eye of each rabbit.The eye was observed at 1, 24, 48, 72 hour, day 7, day 14 and day 21 for all the three animals post test item instillation.Ophthalmoscope was used for scoring of eye lesions. In the initial test,100 mg of test item was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of animal no.1 whereas the left eye of the rabbit served as the control. As animal no. 1 showed no severe ocular lesions; hence a confirmatory test was conducted on additional two rabbits (animal no. 2 and 3); 100 mg of test item was instilled into the conjunctival sac of right eye of both the rabbits and left eye served as the control. All the animals were observed till day 21 post test item instillation.
Observation at 1 hour after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation at 24 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in animal no. 1 and 3 whereas obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids was seen in animal no 2.
At 24 hours observation the rabbits were examined for corneal epithelium cell damage using sodium fluorescein strips and noticed 40%, 50% and 40% damage in animal no. 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Observation at 48 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible in animal no. 3; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in animal no. 1 and 2 whereas obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids in animal no. 3.
Observation at 72 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 7 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in all the animals; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae- Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in animal no.1 and diffuse, crimson color; individual vessels not easily discernible was observed in animal no. 2 and 3; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 14 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible was seen in animal no. 1 and 2 whereas no ulceration or opacity was seen in animal no. 3; Area of Opacity- One quarter (or less) but not zero was seen in animals no. 1 and 2 whereas zero was seen in animal no. 3; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was seen in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was seen in all the animals.
Observation on day 21 after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals; Conjunctivae - Blood vessels normal in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (Normal) in all the animals.The individual mean score for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 at 24, 48, 72 hours for corneal opacity, iris, conjunctiva and chemosis were found 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.00; 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.33, and 1.00, 0.00, 2.00, 1.33, respectivelyHence under the experimental test conditions,Methyl 2-naphthyl ether was considered to be irritating to New Zealand White Female rabbit eyes .
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.