Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-657-5 | CAS number: 67-51-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 April 2012 to 06 July 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A stock solution of 10 g/L was prepared in water (tap water purified by reverse osmosis). Magnetic stirring for 59 minutes in the combined limit/range finding test or for 25 minutes in the additional range finding test and final test was applied to accelerate dissolution and to ensure homogeneity. Stock solutions corresponding to the test concentration were then added to the test media.
- Controls: The reference substance was used as a positive control, tested at 5.0, 12 and 30 mg/L. Untreated test medium controls were run concurrently.
- Evidence of undissolved material: There was no evidence of undissolved test material all stock solutions were clear and colourless. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The sludge was coarsely sieved (1 mm), washed and diluted with ISO-medium. A small amount of the sludge was weighed and dried overnight at approximately 105°C to determine the amount of suspended solids (3.0 g/L of sludge, as used for the test). The pH was 7.7 on the day of testing. The batch of sludge was used one day after collection; therefore 50 mL of synthetic medium was added per litre of activated sludge at the end of the collection day. The sludge was kept aerated at test temperature until use.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Hardness:
- NDA
- Test temperature:
- Ranged from 17.8 to 20.7 ºC
- pH:
- Before he addition of the sludge ranged from 7.2 to 7.6.
pH after exposure ranged from 7.8 to 8.4. - Dissolved oxygen:
- Dissolved oxygen was above 60-70% saturation (60% of ari saturation is > 5 mg/L at 20 ºC) at the start of the test.
- Salinity:
- NDA
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations: 0.10, 0.32, 1.0, 3.2, 10, 32, 100, 320 and 1000 mg/L.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass bottles
- Type: Open
- Aeration: Continuous aeration was achieved using a pipette as an aeration device, delivering clean oil free air. Aeration was sufficient to maintain the dissolved oxygen concentration and to maintain suspension of the sludge.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 250 mL of activated sludge.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 5 replicates per group.
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6 replicates.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Tap-water purified by reverse osmosis and subsequently passed over activated carbon and ion-exchange cartridges.
SYNTHETIC MEDIUM
- Dissolved in dilution water, made up to 1L and filtered. The pH was within 7.5 ± 0.5.
- Volume added to each sample: 16 mL
- Composition:
> 16 g peptone
> 11 g meat extract
> 3 g urea
> 0.7 g NaCl
> 0.4 g CaCl2.2H2O
> 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O
> 2.8 g K2HPO4
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
pH: Was determined immediately before initiation of the test. Initiation of the test was signified by addition of the activated sludge. The pH was also determined post exposure.
Temperature: Determined in the reaction mixture post exposure.
Oxygen consumption: Was determined over a period of 9 to 14 minutes after the 3 hour exposure duration. Measurements were performed with an oxygen probe connected to a multichannel measuring and controlling system.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
- Range finding study: Initially a combined limit/range finding study was performed followed by an additional range finding study. The experimental set up for both can be seen in Table 1.
Combined limit/range finding study:
- Test concentrations: 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L
- Test conditions: Similar to the main test with the following exceptions; sludge pH on test day was 7.6 and a 2.32 g/L solution of N-allythiourea was used as a nitrification inhibitor.
Additional range finding study:
- Test concentrations: 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L
- Test conditions: Similar to the main test.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
The combined limit/range-finding test showed 43% inhibition of the respiration rate at 10 mg/L, 47% at 100 mg/L and 58% (mean value) at 1000 mg/L.
Since not enough information was obtained to perform a final test, an additional range-finding test was performed at 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10 100 and 1000 mg/L.
There was no oxygen uptake from abiotic processes and the results at 1000 mg/L with a nitrification inhibitor showed that the heterotrophic inhibition of the respiration rate was slightly lower than the total inhibition. N-allylthiourea was not used in the additional range-finding test and the final test.
The temperatures measured in the various vessels ranged between 18.8 and 20.6°C and were within the ranges prescribed by the protocol. The pH in all test series, before addition of sludge was 7.4. After the 3 hour exposure period the pH was between 7.2 and 8.2.
The additional range-finding test showed no inhibition of the respiration rate at and below 0.1 mg/L and 3% inhibition of the respiration rate at 1.0 mg/L, 13% at 10 mg/L, 23% at 100 mg/L and 43% at 1000 mg/L. Therefore, the NOEC in the additional range-finding test was at approximately 1.0 mg/L and the expected EC50 was above the highest concentration tested.
The temperatures measured in the various vessels ranged between 18.1 and 19.6°C and were within the ranges prescribed by the protocol. The pH in all test series, before addition of sludge was between 7.3 and 7.4. After the 3 hour exposure period the pH was between 7.9 and 8.1. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-Dichlorophenol (99.8%)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 0.1 - 7.9 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 2.1
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 4.4 - 110 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 22 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 4.4 - 110 mg/L
- Details on results:
- No biologically and/or statistically significant inhibition of the respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at and below 1.0 mg/L. Inhibition was observed at 0.32 mg/L, however this response was not concentration related. There was no increase in % inhibition of the respiration rate with increasing concentration at this level, and therefore considered as not significant for the test.
At higher concentrations the inhibitory effect of the test material on aerobic waste water (activated sludge) bacteria increased with increasing concentration, ranging from an average of 25% inhibition at 3.2 mg/L to 51% at 32 mg/L. Starting at 32 mg/L the inhibition of the respiration rate levelled off at approximately 50% inhibition. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance were valid.
- Relevant effect levels: Inhibition of respiration was observed between 52 and 86% at concentrations ranging from 5.0 to 30 mg/L, see Table 3. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the test material was not toxic to waste water (activated sludge) bacteria at or below a 1.0 mg/l (NOEC). The EC50 was determined to be 22 mg/L (95% confidence interval 4.4 to 110 mg/L). Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
- Executive summary:
The toxicity of the test material to microorganisms was determined in a activated sludge respiration inhibition study, performed in line with GLP and to the standardised guidelines OECD 209 and EU method C.11.
Samples of activated sludge were exposed to the test material under freshwater static conditions for 3 hours at nine nominal concentrations ranging between 0.10 and 1000 mg/L, increasing with a spacing factor of 3.2. Optimal contact between the test substance and test medium was ensured applying continuous aeration and stirring during the 3 hour exposure period. Thereafter, oxygen consumption was recorded for 9 to 14 minutes. Blank controls were run concurrently for comparison. The batch of activated sludge was checked for sensitivity by testing the reference substance (3,5- dichlorophenol), which showed normal sensitivity. All acceptability criteria were met and thus the study was considered to be valid.
Under the conditions of the test, the test material was not toxic to waste water (activated sludge) bacteria at or below a 1.0 mg/l (NOEC). The EC₅₀ was determined to be 22 mg/L (95% confidence interval 4.4 to 110 mg/L).
Reference
Table 3. Study Results
Flask |
Concentration (mg/L) |
Respiration Rate (mg O₂/L.h) |
Respiration Rate (mg O₂/L.h)1 |
% Inhibition Respiration3 |
C1 |
0 |
32 |
21 |
|
C2 |
0 |
43 |
29 |
|
C3 |
0 |
34 |
23 |
|
C4 |
0 |
35 |
23 |
|
C5 |
0 |
37 |
25 |
|
C6 |
0 |
32 |
21 |
|
Mean |
0 |
36 |
24 |
|
SD |
0 |
4 |
3 |
|
CV (%) |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
||||
R1 |
5.0 |
17 |
11 |
52 |
R2 |
12 |
10 |
7 |
72 |
R3 |
30 |
5 |
3 |
86 |
|
||||
T1 a |
0.10 |
36 |
24 |
-1 |
T1 b |
0.10 |
35 |
23 |
1 |
T1 c |
0.10 |
32 |
21 |
10 |
T1 d |
0.10 |
28 |
19 |
21 |
T1 e |
0.10 |
37 |
25 |
-4 |
|
||||
T2 a |
0.32 |
32 |
21 |
10*² |
T2 b |
0.32 |
35 |
23 |
1*² |
T2 c |
0.32 |
28 |
19 |
21*² |
T2 d |
0.32 |
30 |
20 |
15*² |
T2 e |
0.32 |
24 |
16 |
32*² |
|
||||
T3 a |
1.0 |
32 |
21 |
10 |
T3 b |
1.0 |
34 |
23 |
4 |
T3 c |
1.0 |
37 |
25 |
-4 |
T3 d |
1.0 |
34 |
23 |
4 |
T3 e |
1.0 |
25 |
17 |
30 |
|
||||
T4 a |
3.2 |
27 |
18 |
24 |
T4 b |
3.2 |
27 |
18 |
24* |
T4 c |
3.2 |
28 |
19 |
21* |
T4 d |
3.2 |
24 |
16 |
32* |
T4 e |
3.2 |
27 |
18 |
24* |
|
||||
T5 a |
10 |
22 |
15 |
38* |
T5 b |
10 |
20 |
13 |
44* |
T5 c |
10 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T5 d |
10 |
17 |
11 |
52* |
T5 e |
10 |
19 |
13 |
46* |
|
||||
T6 a |
32 |
16 |
11 |
55* |
T6 b |
32 |
19 |
13 |
46* |
T6 c |
32 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T6 d |
32 |
16 |
11 |
55* |
T6e |
32 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
|
||||
T7 a |
100 |
16 |
11 |
55* |
T7 b |
100 |
19 |
13 |
46* |
T7 c |
100 |
22 |
15 |
38* |
T7 d |
100 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T7 e |
100 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T8 a |
320 |
20 |
13 |
44* |
T8 b |
320 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T8 c |
320 |
16 |
11 |
55* |
T8 d |
320 |
16 |
11 |
55* |
T8 e |
320 |
15 |
10 |
58* |
T9 a |
1000 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T9 b |
1000 |
17 |
11 |
52* |
T9 c |
1000 |
18 |
12 |
49* |
T9 d |
1000 |
11 |
7 |
69* |
T9 e |
1000 |
17 |
11 |
52* |
C: Control,
R: Reference substance,
T: Test material,
SD: standard deviation,
CV: Coefficient of variation,
* Statistically significant (Bonferroni t-Test: α = 0.05 Toxstat)
1: The amount of suspended solids in the test mixture was 1.5 g/L,
2: This response was not concentration related,
3: Percentage inhibition respiration relative to the control (mean value).
Description of key information
The toxicity of 3,5-Dimethylpyrazole to microorganisms was determined in a key study (Desmares-Koopmans, 2012) which was performed to GLP and the standardised guidelines OECD 209 and EU Method C 11. The study determined to the NOEC to be 1.0 mg/L and the EC50 22 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 22 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 1 mg/L
Additional information
The toxicity to microorganisms of the test material was determined in a GLP compliant study (Desmares-Koopmans, 2012) performed in accordance with standardised guidelines, with a sufficient level of detail to assess the quality of the presented data. The study was performed to a good standard and was assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with Klimisch (1997).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.