Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-988-3 | CAS number: 112-59-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Purity of the test material was not listed.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- The comparative acute toxicity and primary irritancy of the monohexyl ethers of ethylene and diethylene glycol.
- Author:
- Ballantyne B.; Myers R. C.
- Year:
- 1 987
- Bibliographic source:
- Vet Human Tox 29:361-366
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(2-hexyloxyethoxy)ethanol
- EC Number:
- 203-988-3
- EC Name:
- 2-(2-hexyloxyethoxy)ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 112-59-4
- Molecular formula:
- C10H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[2-(hexyloxy)ethoxy]ethan-1-ol
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): diethylene glycol monohexyl ether (DGHE)
- Physical state: Colorless liquid
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The animals were maintained on appropriate commercial diet and municipal water. Both were available ad libitum.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- undiluted, 0.1 and 0.005 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application without washing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 12
- Details on study design:
- Rabbits (2 to 3 kg) whose eyes did not stain after exposure to 2% fluorescein for 20 seconds were used in the study. Test material was instilled into the interior conjunctival sac of one eye of 6 rabbits (0.1 ml) or the surface of the cornea (0.005 ml) of 6 other rabbits. Eyes were inspected for signs of local inflammation at 1, 4 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after instillation. Particular attention was paid to the development of injection of the conjunctiva and nictitating membrane, chemosis, discharge, iritis, and corneal injury (both severity and area of involvement). Corneal opacity and area involved were scored from 0 to 4, injury to the iris was scored from 0 to 2, conjunctival redness and discharge were scored from 0 to 3, and chemosis from 0 to 4.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.8
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.1 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.8
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.1 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.1 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.8
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.1 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.005 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.6
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.005 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.005 mL
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.4
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose volume: 0.005 mL
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Within an hour of instillation of 0.1 ml of test material into the interior conjunctival sac, all animals developed a moderate to marked conjunctivitis, seen as hyperemia, chemosis and discharge (scores of 2 to 3). This started to resolve by Day 2, but 3 animals still had slight hyperemia and chemosis at Day 21. Mild iritis was present from 1 hour (all score of 1) until about 7 days. By 1 hour of instillation, mild-moderate corneal injury that affected up to 3/4 of the cornea was observed in 5 animals (average opacity and area scores of 1.3 and 2.2, respectively). By 24 hours, the 6th animal also showed evidence of mild corneal injury. All but one animal had no evidence of corneal injury after 7 days. Corneal injury was just detectable in this animal at 21 days.
Similar effects were seen in animals treated with 0.005 ml test material on the surface of the cornea, but they resolved quicker. Conjunctivitis was moderate to marked for the first 24 hours(scores of 2 to 3) but was resolved by 7 days in all but one animal. All had normal conjunctiva by Day 14. Minimal iritis was observed in all animals within 1 to 24 hours. This cleared after 2 to 7 days. Mild to moderate corneal injury that affected up to 3/4 of the cornea developed within 4 hours in all rabbits (average opacity and area scores of 1.5 and 3.0, respectively). No injury was observed in any of the animals after 7 days.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Conclusions:
- Instillation of 0.1 mL or 0.005 mL of test material into rabbit eyes produced moderate to severe ocular effects.
- Executive summary:
Fluorescein (2%) staining was used to determine corneal injury before dosing and at readings after one day. Rabbits whose eyes did not stain after exposure to 2% fluorescein for 20 seconds were used in the study. Test material was instilled into the interior conjunctival sac of one eye of 6 rabbits (0.1 mL) or the surface of the cornea (0.005 mL) of 6 other rabbits. Eyes were inspected for signs of local inflammation at 1, 4 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after instillation. Particular attention was paid to the development of injection of the conjunctiva and nictitating membrane, chemosis, discharge, iritis, and corneal injury (both severity and area of involvement). Corneal opacity and area involved were scored from 0 to 4, injury to the iris was scored from 0 to 2, conjunctival redness and discharge were scored from 0 to 3, and chemosis from 0 to 4.
Within an hour of instillation of 0.1 mL of test material into the interior conjunctival sac, all animals developed a moderate to marked conjunctivitis, seen as hyperemia, chemosis and discharge (scores of 2 to 3). This started to resolve by Day 2, but 3 animals still had slight hyperemia and chemosis at Day 21. Mild iritis was present from 1 hour (all score of 1) until about 7 days. By 1 hour of instillation, mild-moderate corneal injury that affected up to 3/4 of the cornea was observed in 5 animals (average opacity and area scores of 1.3 and 2.2, respectively). By 24 hours, the 6th animal also showed evidence of mild corneal injury. All but one animal had no evidence of corneal injury after 7 days. Corneal injury was just detectable in this animal at 21 days.Similar effects were seen in animals treated with 0.005 ml test material on the surface of the cornea, but they resolved quicker. Conjunctivitis was moderate to marked for the first 24 hours (scores of 2 to 3) but was resolved by 7 days in all but one animal. All had normal conjunctiva by Day 14. Minimal iritis was observed in all animals within 1 to 24 hours. This cleared after 2 to 7 days. Mild to moderate corneal injury that affected up to 3/4 of the cornea developed within 4 hours in all rabbits (average opacity and area scores of 1.5 and 3.0, respectively). No injury was observed in any of the animals after 7 days.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.