Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 940-725-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
The available data and available weight of evidence demonstrate that the C9-C14 aliphatic, <2% aromatics are highly unlikely to be carcinogenic and are not classifiable as carcinogens.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Justification for classification or non-classification
These findings do not warrant the classification of C9-C14 aliphatic, < 2% aromatic hydrocarbons as a carcinogen under the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP) or under the Directive 67/518/EEC for dangerous substances and Directive 1999/45/EC for preparations.
Additional information
The weight of evidence is derived from study records reported for the C9-C14 aliphatic, <2% aromatics. C9-C14 aliphatic, <2% aromatics are not genotoxic and are not classifiable as mutagens based upon the results of reliable in vitro and in vivo studies. In bacterial reverse mutation studies, the C9-C14 aliphatic, <2% aromatics were not mutagenic in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (IUCLID section 7.6.1). In mammalian cells in vitro, and in rats in vivo there were no mutagenic, clastenogenic or aneugenic effects reported in read-across from studies on C9-C14 aliphatic, <2% aromatics: a negative chromosome aberration (Human Periferal Lymphocyte Chromosomal Aberration Test, Chinese Hamster Ovary Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay); and an in vivo inhalation exposure bone marrow chromosomal aberration study and micronucleus test (IUCLID sections 7.6.1 and 7.6.2).
Stoddard solvent IIC – There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of Stoddard solvent IIC in female F344/N rats or in B6C3F1 male mice exposed to 2200 mg/m3. The NTP concluded there was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of Stoddard solvent IIC in female B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidences of hepatocellular adenoma. The NOAEC for male rats was determined to be 138 mg/m3. The incidences of benign pheochromocytoma in 550 and 1100 mg/m3 male rats and benign or malignant pheochromocytoma exceeded the historical chamber control ranges, suggesting that exposure to Stoddard solvent IIC caused the increased incidences of these adrenal medulla neoplasms. The incidence of malignant pheochromocytoma was noted as 1 malignant tumor in control animals and 2 malignant tumors in 1100 mg/m3 male rats. However, the adrenal pheochromocytoma are not considered relevant to humans. The relevance of the pheochromocytoma in humans is equivocal at best. The increased incidences of adrenal pheochromocytoma that occurred in male rats are rarely observed in humans and other animals (Nyska et al., 1999; Hartwig 2009). Pheochromocytomas that occur in animals by secondary mechanisms are not considered to be releant to humans or should be used as a basis for classification (Hartwig 2009).
Decalin - There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of decalin in female F344/N rats or in B6C3F1 male mice exposed to 400ppm. Male rats exposed to 50 ppm of decalin had higher rates of tumors of the kidney. These male rat kidney tumors appears to have been associated with an alpha-2u-globulin mediated metabolism. This mechanism is specific to male rats and is not relevant to humans. Female mice displayed increases in liver and uterus tumors however, because the highest neoplasm incidence increase occurred in 25 ppm females, there was not a significant response in the 100 ppm group, and there were no supporting increases in neoplasm multiplicity, it was unclear if the increased neoplasm incidences in females were related to decalin. In the absence of an exposure concentration related response in either sex, the hepatocarcinogenic effect of decalin in female mice was considered an equivocal finding.
Skin tumor promotion - Evidence of increased tumor promotion was observed in the skin of mice treated with PMA (positive control, 29/30) or with 100% v/v normal paraffin test material (15/30). The skin tumors were predominately of epithelial origin and were papillomas, keratoacanthomas and squamous-cell carcinomas. These tumors were generally well- differentiated with the exception of a few of the squamous-cell carcinomas which were anaplastic with some spindle-cell formations. Early studies that examine structurally analogous test materials, kerosene and jet fuels, were noted to promoter dermal tumors in mice. It was noted that tumor development was associated with moderate to severe skin irritation. Since the materials contain very low or no polycyclic aromatic components (PAC’s), it was suggested that tumor development may have resulted from chronic skin irritation. Therefore, a series of studies were conducted to examine the effect of skin irritation on the tumorigenicity of kerosene. In studies conducted by the American Petroleum Institute (API) and CONCAWE, the absence of skin irritation resulted in no statistically significant differences in tumorigenicity between control animals and animals treated with the test materials (Nessel, Craig S., James J. Freeman, Richard C. Forgash, and Richard H. McKee 1999; CONCAWE 1991)). Accordingly, it was concluded that the tumors were the consequence of repeated dermal irritation and not kerosene or jet fuel per se.
Similar findings were noted in the tests of normal paraffins. The tumor promotion activity was greatest in the treated groups displaying the highest degree of dermal irritation, i.e. 100% v/v normal paraffin test material. A low tumor incidence occurred in the groups receiving 50% or 28.6% /v normal paraffin test material (not statistically different from the control group), which correlated to low degrees of dermal irritation. The skin tumor promoting properties of these substances are considered related to repeated dermal irritation (Nessel, 1999).
Hartwig, Greim H, A Reuter, U Richter-Reichhelm HB ,Thielmann HW. Chemically induced pheochromocytomas in rats: mechanisms and relevance for human risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 2009;39(8):695-718.
Nessel, Craig S., James J. Freeman, Richard C. Forgash, and Richard H. McKee. 1999. The Role of Dermal Irritation in the Skin Tumor Promoting Activity of Petroleum Middle Distillates. Toxicological Sciences 49, 48-55 (1999).
Nyska, A., Haseman, J.K., Hailey, J.R., Smetana, S., and Maronpot, R.R. (1999). The association between severe nephropathy and pheochromocytoma in the male F344 rat - the National Toxicology Program experience. Toxicol. Pathol. 27, 456-462.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.