Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-840-4 | CAS number: 160583-22-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation
- Remarks:
- other: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles. Study was carried out with reference to selected rules of GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: HET-CAM Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- With the HET-CAM the irritation property of a test item after contact with mucous membranes or the eye can be determined based on the occurrence of alterations at the CAM and the adjacent capillary system of fertilized and incubated chicken eggs.
The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is a vital vascular membrane with a closed blood vessel system. After application of a test item on the membrane the underlying blood vessels could become damaged. In particular three events are observed:
- hemorrhage (H) (bleeding out from the vessels of the vascularized CAM)
- vessel lysis (L) (disappearance of small vessels)
- protein coagulation (C) (intravasal or extravasal)
Two different methods can be used depending on the transparency of the test item, the reaction-time method or the end-point assessment. Since 2-phenylethyl cyanoacetate is an intransparent solid substance, the end-point assessemnt was applied.
The study procedures were based on the following document:
- The Ocular Toxicity Working Group (OTWG) of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and the National Interagency Centre for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), Background Review Document (BRD): current status of in vitro test methods for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants: The Hen’s Egg Test - Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) test method, March 2006. - GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-phenylethyl 2-cyanoprop-2-enoate
- EC Number:
- 700-840-4
- Cas Number:
- 160583-22-2
- Molecular formula:
- C12 H11 N O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-phenylethyl 2-cyanoprop-2-enoate
- Reference substance name:
- [TN]PhECA[/TN][SPEC][/SPEC][AM] > 98.8 % [/AM]
- IUPAC Name:
- [TN]PhECA[/TN][SPEC][/SPEC][AM] > 98.8 % [/AM]
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- 2-Phenylethyl cyanoacrylate, Batch 3635-59, > 98.8 %
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: HET-CAM
- Strain:
- other: not applicable
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: not applicable
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 300 mg test item
0.3 ml positive control (1% sodium dodecylphosphate prepared in physiological saline) and negative control (physiological
saline) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 300 s
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 5 m
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 0
- Details on study design:
- Fertilized eggs were incubated until day 9, then the air cell of the eggs were marked and cut off with a rotating saw blade. The uncovered inner membrane was moistened with physiological saline and subsequently the egg was kept at room temperature. Subsequently the physiological saline was removed and the inner egg membrane carefully eliminated using forceps to expose the CAM.
Three eggs were treated for 300 seconds with 300 mg 2-phenylethyl cyanoacrylate or for 30 seconds with 0.3 ml Texapon ASV (5% active substance) as a positive controle. After the treatment period the eggs were carefully rinsed with approximately 5 ml of physiological saline. The appearance of haemorrhage, vessel lysis and coagulation on the CAM was monitored and recorded over the following 280-second period.
Results for the three test method endpoints were evaluated separately for each egg and the S-score was calculated.
Classification scheme of the HET-CAM End-Point Assessement
S [sum of single value] Evaluation
0 – 5 slightly irritating
6 – 12 moderately irritating
13 – 15 irritating
16 – 18 severely irritating (R 41)
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- other: HET-CAM S-score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 600 s
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 18
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: individual scores: see below
- Other effects:
- no other effects
Any other information on results incl. tables
Test results:
Test substance |
Irritation value |
Evaluation |
|
End-Point Assessment [S] |
|
PhECA, Charge 3635-59 (undiluted) |
0 |
slightly irritating |
Reference item Texapon ASV, 5% AS |
11 |
moderately irritating |
It was observed that the test substance partially polymerized on the CAM, leaving a sticky cover that could not be rinsed but removed with forceps. Removing the substance sheet like this did not result in a problematic damage of the CAM.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: ICCVAM
- Conclusions:
- The mean in vitro irritancy score obtained with the positive control (Texapon ASV) was within the historical control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.
The mean in vitro irritancy score obtained after a treatment period of 300 seconds and an observation period of 280 seconds with 2-phenylethyl cyanoacrylate was 0.
Finally, it is concluded that this test is valid and that 2-phenylethyl cyanoacrylate is not irritant in the Hen’s Egg Test – Chorioallantoic Membrane Test under the described experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
The possible ocular irritancy of 2 -phenylethyl cyanoacrylate was tested with an HET-CAM through topical application for 300 seconds using the endpoint assessment method. The test substance was applied undiluted (300 mg) directly on top of the chorioallantoic membrane.
The mean S-score obtained with the positive control (5 % Texapon ASV) was 11 and within the historical control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The mean S-score obtained with 2 -phenylethyl cyanoacrylate was 0.
Thus, it is concluded that this test is valid and that 2 -phenylethyl cyanoacrylate is not irritant in the Hen’s Egg Test – Chorioallantoic Membrane Test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.