Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-460-4 | CAS number: 7078-98-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1998-06-04 - 1998-12-31
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-compliant study comparable to OECD TG 474. The reliable study is acceptable for assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (12/96 final draft [adopted on 21st July 1997])
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 429-460-4
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 7078-98-0
- Molecular formula:
- C21 H26 O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(phenylenemethylene)cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD-l(ICR) BR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Raleigh, NC or Portage, MI, U.S.A.
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation:
26.2 - 34.8 g (males), 24.3 - 28.6 g (females) - first dose range-finding study;
30.9 - 37.2 g (males), 20.9 - 27.8 g (females) - second dose range-finding study;
31.3 - 34.3 g (males) - third dose range-finding study
29.1 - 37.1 g (males) - first MN study;
32.2 - 36.4 g (males) - second MN study).
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: separated by gender, up to seven animals per cage
- Diet: Commercial diet, ad libitum
- Water: Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 64° F - 79° F (18 - 26 °C)
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1998-07-22 To: 1998-12-03
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: corn oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Because of difficulty passing the test item mixed with 0.5% methylcellulose through a 23-gauge needle, corn oil was selected.
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 10 – 75 mg/mL (Dose Range-Finding Study 2)
- Amount of vehicle: Dosing volume 20 mL/kg - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Prior to dosing, the top stock of the test item was prepared by adding the appropriate volume of the vehicle, corn oil, to a preweighed quantity of the test item. The stock was mixed by stirring with a spatula for about 2 minutes, sonicating for about 10 minutes, and stirring on a stirplate for about 3 minutes. The remaining stocks were prepared by dilution from the top stock.
- Dosing Stocks for Micronucleus Study 1: 11.25, 22.5, 45.0 mg/mL [225, 450, 900 mg/kg bw]
- Dosing Stocks for Micronucleus Study 2: 25.0, 37.5 mg/mL [500, 750 mg/kg bw] - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single treatment
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- Micronucleus Study 1: 24 and 48 hours
Micronucleus Study 2: 48 hours
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
225, 450, 900 mg/kg bw (MN study 1)
Basis:
other: intraperitoneal injection
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500, 750 mg/kg bw (MN study 2)
Basis:
other: intraperitoneal injection
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 males/6 females per dose and sampling time,
except:
- 10 satellite animals at 900 mg/kg bw
- 16 satellite animals at 750 mg/kg bw - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - Name: Cyclophosphamide (CP)
- Justification for choice of positive control: known as substance to produce micronuclei in vivo at exposure levels expected to give a detectable increase over background (according to OECD TG 474)
- Route of administration: orally
- Frequency of administration: once
- Doses / concentrations: 80 mg/kg bw
- Solubilized in: sterile deionized water
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Results of three range-finding studies with the test item
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields):
Approximately 18 hours before treatment with the test article the animals received no food but water ad libitum. At the beginning of the treatment the animals (including the controls) were weighed and the individual volume to be administered was adjusted to the animal's body weight. The animals received the test article, the vehicle or the positive control substance once. Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 or 48 hours after treatment.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
- Extraction of bone marrow/preliminary work: At the appropriate harvest timepoints, the animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by incision of the diaphragm. The hind limb bones (tibias or femurs) were removed for marrow extraction. For each animal, the marrow flushed from the bones was combined in an individual centrifuge tube containing 3-5 mL fetal bovine serum (one tube per animal).
- Preparation of slides: Following centrifugation to pellet the tissue, the supernatant was removed by aspiration and portions of the pellet were spread on slides and air dried. The slides were fixed in methanol, stained in May-Grünwald solution followed by Giemsa, and protected by mounting with coverslips. At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Slides were scored for micronuclei and the PCE to NCE cell ratio. The micronucleus frequency (expressed as percent micronucleated cells) was determined by analyzing the number of micronucleated PCEs from at least 2000 PCEs per animal. The frequency of PCE:NCE ratio was determined by scoring the number of PCEs and NCEs observed in the optic fields while scoring at least the first 200 erythrocytes on the slide. The historical background frequency of micronuclei in the Crl:CD-l(ICR) BR strain was about 0.0-0.4%, which is within the range reported in the published data (Salamone and Mavoumin, 1994). The criteria for the identification of micronuclei were those of Schmid (1976). The unit of scoring was the micronucleated cell, not the micronucleus; thus, the occasional cell with more than one micronucleus was counted as one micronucleated PCE, not two (or more) micronuclei. - Evaluation criteria:
- Assay data analysis was performed using an analysis of variance on untransformed proportions of cells with micronuclei per animal and on untransformed PCE:NCE ratios when the variances were homogeneous. Ranked proportions were used for heterogeneous variances. If the analysis of variance was statistically significant (p < 0.05), a Dunnett's t-test was used to determine which dose groups, if any, were statistically significantly different from the vehicle control. Analyses were performed separately for each sampling time. Additionally, parametric or nonparametric tests for trend may have been employed to identify any dose-related response.
The criteria for a positive response was the detection of a statistically significant increase in micronucleated PCEs for at least one dose level, and a statistically significant dose-related response. A test item that did not induce both of these responses was considered negative. Statistical significance was not the only determinant of a positive response, the biological relevance of the results was also considered.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The high dose produced mortality in the animals.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDIES
- 1st dose range-finding study: The test item was dissolved in corn oil and dosed by intraperitoneal injection to 12 animals/sex at 2000 mg/kg bw (30 animals); three animals/sex received the vehicle control article, corn oil, only. The animals were anesthetized using CO2/O2 and blood samples were taken periorbitally at approximately 0.5, 2 and 4 hours postdose from 3 animals/sex/sampling time. At the 0.5-hour timepoint, blood samples were also taken from 3 animals/sex that received only the vehicle. The blood samples were centrifuged and the serum was transferred to labeled tubes and frozen. The animals were observed after dosing for toxic signs and/or mortality. The remaining 3 animals/sex were not bled; however, clinical observations for toxic signs and/or mortality were performed for 2 days.
- 2nd dose range-finding study: The test item was dissolved in corn oil and dosed by intraperitoneal injection to 3 animals/sex/dose level (30 animals). The animals were dosed at 200, 500, 900, 1200, and 1500 mg/kg bw and observed for 2 days after dosing for toxic signs and/or mortality.
- 3rd dose range-finding study: The test item was dissolved in corn oil and dosed by intraperitoneal injection to 3 animals at 900 mg/kg. In addition, 2 males were dosed with the vehicle control article, corn oil. The animals were observed after dosing for toxic signs and/or mortality. The animals were anesthetized using CO2/O2 and blood samples were taken periorbitally at 4 hours postdose. The blood samples were centrifuged and the serum was transferred to labeled tubes and frozen.
Based on the results of the dose range-finding studies, the maximum tolerated dose was estimated to be 900 mg/kg bw. Only males were used in the main studies because there were no substantial differences in clinical observations between the sexes in the dose range-finding studies.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- The test item induced signs of clinical toxicity in the treated animals.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: There was a statistically significant decrease in the PCE:NCE ratio at 225 and 450 mg/kg bw at the 24-hour harvest timepoint, demonstrating that the test item was cytotoxic to the bone marrow.
- Induction of micronuclei: The test item did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCEs and is considered negative in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay under the conditions of this assay. As a positive control 80 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide was used (administered per os), resulted in a distinct increase of induced micronucleus frequency under the conditions of this assay.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.