Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 425-240-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (1983)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 425-240-7
- EC Name:
- -
- Molecular formula:
- C28H42O8Cl2Co2N12Zn4
- IUPAC Name:
- Zinc hexacyanocobaltate(III), tertiary butyl alcohol/polypropylene glycol complex
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98 , TA100, TA1535, TA97a, TA102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S-9 fraction from Aroclor 1254 induced rat (= S9-mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Exp. 1 (with and without metabolic activation) - for all strains: 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
Exp. 2 (without metabolic activation) - for TA98, TA100, TA1535: 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 µg/plate; - for TA97a, TA102: 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 µg/plate
Exp. 2 (with metabolic activation) - for TA98, TA97a, TA102: 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 µg/plate; - for TA100, TA1535: 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- sterile purified water (water purified by reverse osmosis);
As no adequate solvent could be readily identified, all test treatments were performed using a suspension.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Nitroflourene (5 µg/plate; only TA98), Na-azide (2 µg/plate; TA1535 and TA100), 2-aminoacridine (50 µg/plate; TA97a), Glutaraldehyd (25 µg/plate; TA102), 2-aminoanthracene (5 µg/plate; at least one strain).
- Remarks:
- The positive controls 2-nitroflourene, Na-azide, 2-aminoacridine and Glutaraldehyd were used without S9-mix, 2-aminoanthracene was used with S9-mix.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
Two independent experiments performed, each including a 20 min. (37°C) liquid pre-incubation step.
The test protocol was designed to maximise the detection of any mutagenic activity associated with the divalent metals known to be complexed within the test material. Modifications include pre-incubation rather than plate incorporation treatments, the use of HEPES rather than Phosphate buffer in the assay system and the inclusion of a tester strain sensitive to the mutagenic activity of these metals (For reference see Pagano and Zeiger, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 19, 1992, 139-146).
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
mutant count, inspection of backround lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was considered to be mutagenic if: 1) the assay was valid (negative and positive controls valid and no more than 5% of the plates lost through contamination or some other unforeseen event) 2) Dunnett's test gave a significant response (p = 0.01), and the data set showed a significant dose-correlation 3) the positive responses were reproducible.
- Statistics:
- The m-statistic was calculated to check that the data were Poisson-distributed, and Dunnett's test was used to compare the counts of each dose with the control. The presence or otherwise of a dose response was checked by linear regression.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA97a, TA102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Particulate matter was observed in some of the plates, which was not unexpected as the material was applied as a suspension.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
An initial toxicity range-finder experiment was carried out in strain TA100 only, using final concentrations of 8-5000 µg/plate, plus negative (vehicle) and positive controls. Evidence of toxicity was observed only at 5000 µg/plate, and this same dose range was used for the main testings.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In Exp. 1, toxicity was seen down to 200 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix and down to 1000 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix, in three of the four strains tested (two strains in the case of this toxicity in the absence of S9-mix). In Exp. 2, the concentrations were reduced accordingly although toxicity was still apparent at the highest levels (and at the two highest concentrations tested in TA100 in the presence of S9-mix). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
The test substance was investigated in a Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Test according to OECD TG 471 on S. thyphimurium TA 98, TA100, TA1535, TA97a and TA102. No increase in revertant numbers was detected, in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation. This was the case even though the test protocol was designed to maximise the detection of any mutagenic activity associated with the divalent metals known to be complexed within the test material (pre-incubation rather than plate incorporation, use of HEPES rather than Phosphate buffer, inclusion of a tester strain sensitive to the mutagenic activity of these metals). Therefore the substance was considered to be non-mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.