Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-431-6 | CAS number: 59-50-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 Feb - 18 Mar 1991
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1984
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only four S. typhimurium strains (additional E. coli WP2 strains or S. typhimurium TA 102 is missing)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Chlorocresol
- EC Number:
- 200-431-6
- EC Name:
- Chlorocresol
- Cas Number:
- 59-50-7
- Molecular formula:
- C7H7ClO
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-chloro-3-methylphenol
- Details on test material:
- Batch No.: 791
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his operon
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment: 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Second experiment: 30, 60, 120, 240, 480 and 960 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
The highest dose of the first experiment was chosen based on the standard protocol. Based on the bacteriotoxic effect of the test substance as determined in the first experiment 960 µg/plate was chosen as the highest concentration for the repeat test. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The used solvent was chosen out of the following solvents, in the order given: water, methanol, ethanol, acetone, DMSO, DMF, and ethylene glycol dimethylether according to information given by the internal sponsor.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other: sodium azide (10 µg/plate, -S9, TA 1535), nitrofurantoin (0.2 µg/plate, -S9, TA 100), 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (10 µg/plate, -S9, TA 1537 and 0.5 µg/plate, -S9, TA 98), 2-aminoanthracene (3 µg/plate, +S9, all strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4 replications each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: titer
- Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice the amount of negative controls, whereas for TA 1537, at least a threefold increase should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these guidelines may be overruled by good scientific judgement. In case of questionable results, investigation should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 480 µg/plate and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 480 µg/plate and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 480 µg/plate and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 240 µg/plate and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
Summaries of historical negative and positive controls of experiments performed within 6 month each from January 1988 to December 1990 are provided. Please refer to Table 1 under "Any other informations on results incl. tables" for the summarized historical control data of July to December 1990.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of historical negative and positive controls of experiments performed from July to December 1990
Compound |
S9 mix |
Strain |
|||||||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
||||||
median |
semi-Q range |
median |
semi-Q range |
median |
semi-Q range |
median |
semi-Q range |
||
water |
- |
13 |
2 |
105 |
16 |
9 |
1 |
21 |
4 |
ethanol |
- |
12 |
3 |
93 |
14 |
9 |
1 |
22 |
3 |
Na azide |
- |
882 |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NF |
- |
|
|
380 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
4-NPDA |
- |
|
|
|
|
48 |
9 |
71 |
15 |
30% water |
+ |
18 |
3 |
143 |
15 |
11 |
2 |
29 |
3 |
30% ethanol |
+ |
19 |
3 |
118 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
39 |
7 |
2-AA |
+ |
175 |
41 |
800 |
243 |
84 |
17 |
485 |
93 |
Na azide = sodium azide, NF = nitrofurantoin, 4-NPDA = 4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine
Table 2: First experiment - Average revertants per plate in tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 without S9-mix
Concentration [µg/plate] |
Revertants/plate [mean] |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
|
0 |
13 |
89 |
8 |
32 |
8 |
13 |
94 |
9 |
34 |
40 |
15 |
99 |
6 |
37 |
200 |
14 |
89 |
8 |
30 |
1000 |
5 |
18 |
4 |
7 |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Na-azide1 |
603 |
|
|
|
NF2 |
|
477 |
|
|
4-NPDA3 |
|
|
70 |
167 |
Positive controls:1Sodium-azide, 10 µg/plate (only TA 1535)
2Nitrofurantoin, 0.2 µg/plate (only TA 100)
34-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine, 10 µg/plate (only TA 1537), 0.5 µg/plate (only TA 98)
Table 3: First experiment - Average revertants per plate in tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 with S9-mix
Concentration [µg/plate] |
Revertants/plate [mean] |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
|
0 |
20 |
111 |
9 |
38 |
8 |
21 |
124 |
10 |
46 |
40 |
20 |
120 |
10 |
46 |
200 |
11 |
100 |
6 |
51 |
1000 |
7 |
35 |
3 |
13 |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2-AA4 |
164 |
1211 |
74 |
446 |
Positive controls:42-aminoanthracene, 3 µg/plate
Table 4: Second experiment - Average revertants per plate in tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 without S9-mix
Concentration [µg/plate] |
Revertants/plate [mean] |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 98 |
|
0 |
14 |
78 |
9 |
25 |
30 |
13 |
86 |
9 |
28 |
60 |
13 |
89 |
9 |
28 |
120 |
12 |
91 |
12 |
29 |
240 |
12 |
89 |
7 |
29 |
480 |
14 |
66 |
5 |
23 |
960 |
5 |
35 |
2 |
17 |
Na-azide1 |
732 |
|
|
|
NF2 |
|
364 |
|
|
4-NPDA3 |
|
|
58 |
67 |
Positive controls:1Sodium-azide, 10 µg/plate (only TA 1535)
2Nitrofurantoin, 0.2 µg/plate (only TA 100)
34-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine, 10 µg/plate (only TA 1537), 0.5 µg/plate (only TA 98)
Table 5: Second experiment - Average revertants per plate in tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 with S9-mix
Concentration [µg/plate] |
Revertants/plate [mean] |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
|
0 |
24 |
143 |
12 |
45 |
30 |
30 |
135 |
12 |
48 |
60 |
29 |
94 |
8 |
43 |
120 |
29 |
117 |
10 |
50 |
240 |
27 |
138 |
7 |
44 |
480 |
19 |
75 |
6 |
24 |
960 |
21 |
47 |
3 |
7 |
2-AA4 |
188 |
756 |
77 |
372 |
Positive controls:42-aminoanthracene, 3 µg/plate
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
The mutagenic potential of the test substance was tested in the Salmonella/Microsome test according to OECD Guideline 471 (1983) and in compliance with GLP. Tester strains used were the Salmonella typhimurium histidine auxotrophs TA98, TA100, TA 1535 and TA 1537. Liver microsomal enzymes were prepared from at least 6 male Sprague-Dawley or male Wistar rats which had received a peritoneal injection of Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg bw (S9 mix). The test substance was solved in ethanol. In a first experiment, 6 dose levels from 0 - 5000 µg/plate were plated with overnight cultures of TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 in the presence or absence of rat S9 mix. As a result, the appropriate maximum dose to be plated in the second experiment was determined to be 960 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation, respectively. In the second experiment the test substance was tested at 5 dose levels (30, 60, 120, 240, 480, 960 µg/plate) along with negative control and appropriate positive controls in the absence or presence of rat microsomal enzymes. DMSO was used as vehicle for positive controls. 0.1 mL of test-substance in ethanol or positive control in DMSO were added to 0.1 mL of bacteria solution (grown for 17 hours at 37 °C at 90 rpm) and 0.5 mL S9 mix or buffer (for non-activating tests) were added to 2.0 mL molten top-agar. After incubation for a maximum of 30 s at 45 °C in a water bath and mixing, this solution was poured onto solid agar plates. Four replicates were plated for all dose levels and controls. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h, before the colonies were counted. A result was evaluated as positive when it caused a doubling in the mean number of revertants per plate in at least one tester strain. This increase must be accompanied by a positive dose response. There was no indication of bacteriotoxic effects of the test substances at doses of up to and including 200 µg/plate. Total bacteria counts were comparable to or only slightly different from the negative controls. No inhibition of growth was noted. Doses at and above 240 µg/plate caused bacteriotoxic effects. None of the four strains tested showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the negative controls, with and without metabolic activation. The respective positive controls caused an increase in the number of revertants which proved the sensitivity of the test. Therefore, under the conditions of this study, no indications of mutagenic effects of the test substance could be found at doses up to 960 µg/plate in any of the S. typhimurium strains tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.