Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-680-6 | CAS number: 98-55-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- no data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Non GLP study but conducted similarly to OECD guideline 471.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no details about test substance and solvent or vehicle control
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats and Syrian golden hamsters injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Ranged between 10 µg/plate and 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: no data
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- congo red
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) and preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h - Evaluation criteria:
- Test article had to induce doubling the mean number of revertants / plate
- Statistics:
- No details given in study report
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Alpha-terpineol was not mutagenic in the Ames test in both plate incorporation and preincubation methods with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria conducted similarly to OECD guideline 471, TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 strains of S. typhimurium were exposed to Alpha-terpineol at concentrations between 1µg and 1000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation system liver S9 homogenate, from male Sprague-Dawley rats and Syriyan golden hamsters injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight.
Alpha-terpineol was tested for mutagenicity at different dose concentrations with both direct plate incorporation and preincubation methodology. Alpha-terpineol caused no dose-related response in the number of histidine auxotroph revertants. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
For alpha-Terpineol an Ames test and an in vitro gene mutation test with mammalian cells are available but not a cytogenicity assay. To cover the latter endpoint an in vitro chromosomal aberration test performed with Terpineol multi (a multi-constituent substance with alpha-Terpineol as its main constituent and gamma-Terpineol as the minor constituent), will be used for read-across. In the toxico-kinetic section) the constituents of alpha-Terpineol and Terpineol multi are presented. These terpineols are expected to have a similar genotoxicity profile because of their similarity in structure. It can also be seen that all constituents of Terpineol multi have a similar backbone, which is the cyclohexyl ring. The attached methyl groups are para-positioned. There are two functional groups. The first one is the tertiary alcohol, which is not reactive because no additional reactive groups are adjacent to this alcohol. The second functional group is the double bond, at the para–position but can be inside or outside the cyclohexyl ring. These differences are thought to be of minor importance for the genotoxicity potential
Alpha-Terpineol: Ames test
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria conducted similarly to OECD guideline 471,TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 strains of S. typhimurium were exposed to alpha-Terpineol at concentrations between 1µg and 1000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation system liver S9 homogenate, from male Sprague-Dawley rats and Syriyan golden hamsters injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight (Seifried 2006). Alpha-Terpineol was tested for mutagenicity at different concentrations with both direct plate incorporation and preincubation methodology. Alpha-Terpineol caused no dose-related response in the number of histidine auxotroph revertants. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains.
Alpha-Terpineol MLA study
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay conducted similarly to OECD guideline 476, mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells cultured in vitro were exposed to alpha-Terpineol at concentrations between 0.14 µg/mL and 0.65 µg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation with liver S9 prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats (Seifried 2006). Alpha-Terpineol was tested for cytotoxic concentration up to an upper limit of 10000 µg/plate. In both non-activated and S9-activated conditions, response was negative at a dose 0.14-0.65 µg/mL. The positive controls ethylmethylsulfonate (without metabolic activation) and 3-methylcholanthrene (with metabolic activation) induced the appropriate response.
Terpineol multi: Chromosome aberration study
In an in vitro chromosome aberration test performed according to OECD guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, human primary lymphocyte cultures were exposed to Terpineol multi in DMSO at concentration range of 5.598-1543 μg/mL, for 3 + 17 h (treatment + recovery) with metabolic activation (2% S-9 fraction of Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats), and for 3 + 17 h or 20 + 0 h (treatment + recovery) without metabolic activation for a preliminary cytotoxicity test (Lloyd 2010). In the main test, two experiments were performed at concentrations up to 600 µg/mL without S-9 and up to 800 µg/mL with S-9 and the following concentrations were selected for analysis: Experiment 1: Without S-9 (treatment: 3 h): 0, 350, 425 and 450 μg/mL; with S-9 (treatment: 3 h): 0, 300, 550 and 625 μg/mL. Experiment 2: Without S-9 (treatment: 20 h): 0, 75, 200 and 225 μg/mL; with S-9 (treatment: 3 h): 0, 400, 550, 625 and 650 μg/mL. Proportion of cells with structural aberrations in negative control cultures fell within historical vehicle control ranges. Positive controls (4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide at 2.5 and 5 µg/mL without S-9 and cyclophosphamide at 10, 20 and 30 µg/mL with S-9) induced the appropriate response. Treatment of cells with Terpineol multi in the presence or absence of S-9 in both experiments resulted in frequencies of cells with structural or numerical aberrations that were generally similar to those observed in concurrent vehicle controls for all concentrations analysed. Numbers of aberrant cells (excluding gaps) in treated cultures fell within the normal range with the exception of one culture at the highest concentration analysed with S-9 in experiment 1 (625.0 µg/mL). However, the aberration frequency (excluding gaps) in the replicate culture at 625.0 µg/mL in experiment 1 and in all other cultures analysed in experiments 1 and 2 fell within the normal range. Under the test conditions, Terpineol multi is not considered as clastogenic in human lymphocytes.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
For finalising a conclusion on the endpoint genotoxicity all three standard in vitro tests are needed. The Ames test is considered to be the most predictive for genotoxicity and therefore, this has been selected here.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the negative results of the Ames test and the mouse lymphoma assay with alpha-Terpineol and the negative result of the in vitro chromosome aberration assay with Terpineol multi (a multi-constituent substance with alpha-Terpineol as its main constituent and gamma-Terpineol as the minor constituent) alpha-Terpineol does not need to be classified for genotoxicity in vitro according to EU Directive 67/548 (DSD) and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.