Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-528-1 | CAS number: 107-87-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 212.42 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5 284 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 2 500 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The starting point NOAEC (neonatal toxicity) obtained according to OECD 414 was modified accounting for the differences between experimental and human exposure conditions. The conversion of a rat inhalation NOAEC to a corrected inhalaton NOAEC to assess human inhalation exposure was performed: to take into account the differences in exposure duration a factor of 0.75 was included (6 h for the rodent to 8 h for the worker), additionally a factor of 0.67 is included (6.7m³, as a respiratory volume for humans for an 8-hour shift divided by 10 m³, the respiratory volume for worker by light activity). Corrected NOAEC = 5284 mg/m³ * 0.75* 0.67 = 2655.2 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No correction is used as the endpoint was from a prenatal developmental toxicity study. As there is no variation possible for the duration of exposure (as gestation is a fixed duration), there is not correction value. That is, rat gestation is 19 day. It can't be longer, so there's no chronic expsoure possible to correct for.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- There is no allometric scaling in inhalation studies
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default Value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default Value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 062.1 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The standard value of 5x the long term DNEL was used to establish the short-term DNEL.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 20.18 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5 284.05 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 008.9 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The starting point for a long-term systemic DNEL (dermal) value for workers was the NOAEC value of 5284.05 mg/m³ from the pre-natal developmental toxicity study in rats via inhalation. The starting point NOAEC obtained in the animal study was corrected accounting for the differences between experimental and human exposure conditions. The conversion of an inhalation rat NOAEC into a corrected dermal NOAEL to assess human dermal exposure was performed: to take into account the differences in respiratory volume of rats versus humans a factor of 0.38 was included; to take into account the differences in exposure duration a factor of 0.75 was included (6 h for the rodent to 8 h for the worker). A correction of 0.67 for light work was also included. Applying those factors resulted in a corrected value of 1008.9 mg/kg
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Duration of exposure is not valid in a developmental toxicity study as dosing only runs as long as gestation, and that time period can't be prolonged. So there is no acute or chronic dosing to adjust for.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 52.84 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5 284 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 321.01 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The starting point NOAEC (neonatal toxicity) obtained according to OECD 414 was modified accounting for the differences between experimental and human exposure conditions. The conversion of a rat inhalation NOAEC to a corrected inhalaton NOAEC to assess human inhalation exposure was performed: to take into account the differences in exposure duration a factor of 0.25 was included (6 h for the rodent to 24 h for the general population ), No correction for light work is added for general population and the study was conducted for 7 days a week, so there is no time correction. Corrected NOAEC = 5284 mg/m³ * 0.25 = 1321 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- As this is a developmental study, there is a fixed period of gestation and as such, there can't be an "acute" or "chronic" time period to adjust for, so there is no correction for dosing time.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No scaling for inhalation studies
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default values
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default values
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default values
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 264.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The standard adjustment of 5x the long term DNEL is used to establish the short term DNEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 15.19 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5 284.05 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 519 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The starting point NOAEC (neonatal toxicity) obtained according to OECD 414 was modified accounting for the
differences between experimental and human exposure conditions. The conversion of a rat inhalation NOAEC to a corrected inhalaton NOAEC to assess human inhalation exposure was performed: to take into account the differences in exposure duration a factor of 0.25 was included (6 h for the rodent to 24 h for the general population ). The inhalation to dermal route was corrected for by multiplying 5284.05 mg/m3 by 1.15 m3/kg/24hours to give 1519 mg/kg/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No adjustment is used as the study was a developmental toxicity study, and since gestation is a fixed time point, there is no "long term" or chronic version of the study to adjust for.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 15.19 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- effect on fertility
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5 284.05 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 519 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The starting point NOAEC (neonatal toxicity) obtained according to OECD 414 was modified accounting for the
differences between experimental and human exposure conditions. The conversion of a rat inhalation NOAEC to a corrected inhalaton NOAEC to assess human inhalation exposure was performed: to take into account the differences in exposure duration a factor of 0.25 was included (6 h for the rodent to 24 h for the general population ). The inhalation to dermal route was corrected for by multiplying 5284.05 mg/m3 by 1.15 m3/kg/24hours to give 1519 mg/kg/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- No adjustment is used as the study was a developmental toxicity study, and since gestation is a fixed time point, there is no "long term" or chronic version of the study to adjust for.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.