Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-138-9 | CAS number: 68516-20-1 A complex combination of hydrocarbons produced by the distillation of products from a steam-cracking process. It consists predominantly of aromatic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C7 through C12 and boiling in the range of approximately 130°C to 220°C(266°F to 428°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://poisoncentres.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 192 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- None applied
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 384 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- None applied
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 192 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 384 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (STEL) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 384 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The IOELV (mg/m3) was converted into a human dermal NOAEL (mg/kg bwt/d) by adjusting for differences in uptake between the two routes of exposure (REACH Guidance, Appendix R.8-2, Example B.4).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used without modification (ECHA Guidance, Appendix R.8-13)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 56.5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- None applied
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 226 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- None applied
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV-STEL has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV-STEL has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The IOELV-STEL has therefore been taken as a human 15-min NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV-STEL to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 56.5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Dose descriptor:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 226 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV-STEL has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV-STEL has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The IOELV-STEL has therefore been taken as a human 15-min NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV-STEL to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV-STEL (15-min) used as starting point (human NAEL)
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 226 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The IOELV (mg/m3) was converted into a human dermal NOAEL (mg/kg bwt/d) by adjusting for differences in uptake between the two routes of exposure (REACH Guidance, Appendix R.8-2, Example B.4).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8.13 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- neurotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance; ECETOC (2003, 2010)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1.7
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: SCOEL/SUM/18, March 2001; Dir 2006/15/EC
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The IOELV (mg/m3) was converted into a human oral NOAEL (mg/kg bwt/d) by adjusting for differences in uptake between the two routes of exposure (REACH Guidance, Appendix R.8-2, Example B.4).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1.7
- Justification:
- The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- IOELV (8-hr) used as starting point (human NAEL)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
General population DNELs for toluene have used the worker IOELV as their starting point. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by SCOEL, with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Importantly, results from human investigations played a key part in this process. It was also considered that the use of a common starting point (the IOELV) for both population groups would result in greater consistency in hazard (dose-response) identification than would be the case if different methods of assessment had been used for workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hour no adverse effect level (NAEL) which, after modification (though use of an assessment factor), would be more broadly applicable to the general population. Similar considerations apply to the IOELV-STEL, which has been taken as a surrogate human 15-minute NAEL.
The IOELV was modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers (8-hours) versus the chronic exposure experienced by the general population (24-hours).
An assessment factor (AF) was used to adapt the IOELV for use with the general population. As the IOELV relied heavily on human data, only a factor to account for human intra-species variation was considered necessary. In addition, since no particularly susceptible human sub-populations (including groups exhibiting polymorphisms or other predisposing factors) had been identified in the human literature for toluene, a factor reflecting the general relationship between the intra-species AF for workers and that for the general population was considered applicable.
An AFgeneral population = 1.7, reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF = 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF = 3 for workers, was therefore applied to the IOELV to give a general population DNEL. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which indicated that the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters for human populations of different ages, genders and disease states supports use of these AFs.
It is noted that a slightly larger AFgeneral population (AF = 2) would have resulted if intra-species defaults from REACH guidance had been used, however this would have had only a small effect on the magnitude of the DNEL.
Acute toxicity
A DNEL for acute toxicity should be derived if an acute hazard leading to acute toxicity (e.g. C&L) has been identified and there is a potential for high peak exposures. These “peaks” are normally associated with inhalation exposure but are less common for skin contact and ingestion (Appendix R.8-8).
Oral and dermal:
Toluene does not present an acute hazard following ingestion or skin contact hence a DNEL will not be derived.
Inhalation:
Acute inhalation exposures are associated with signs of drowsiness and dizziness at concentrations lower than those which cause lethality, hence a DNEL will be proposed for the inhalation route. The acute LC50 for toluene in the rat (4 hour exposure) is > 20000 mg/m3. The NOAEC for acute CNS effects is 1131 mg/m3 in the rat (from repeat dose study) and 192 mg/m3 in humans (4.5 hour exposure). The current IOELV and STEL are based on a large amount of human data which indicate that the LOAEC for subjective effects of toluene is about 60 ppm (230 mg/m3). New data by Muttray et al, 2005 indicate that 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) is a NOAEC for acute subjective effects supporting the current IOELV. Consequently, the established 15-min STEL of 100 ppm (384 mg/m3) will be used to determine the short-term acute inhalation DNEL for the general population.
Dose descriptor – 15 min duration, short-term acute exposure
IOELV-STEL = 384 mg/m3
Modification of dose descriptor
None required (human inhalation exposure).
NOAELacute inhalation = IOELV = 384 mg/m3
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV-STEL has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV-STEL has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The IOELV-STEL has therefore been taken as a human 15-min NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV-STEL to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELacute inhalation = 384 mg/m3 / 1.7 = 226 mg/m3
Irritation
Skin:
No dose/response information can be derived from data available for liquid toluene and DNELs cannot therefore be determined. However, liquid toluene is irritating to the skin hence appropriate RMM and OCs should be employed.
Eye:
Liquid toluene is not irritating to the eye although toluene vapours in ambient air are reported to cause subjective sensations of eye irritation in humans. A NOAEC of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) was established by Muttray et al, 2005 supporting the current IOELV. Consequently the established 15-min STEL of 100 ppm (384 mg/m3) will be used to determine the eye irritation DNEL for the general population.
Dose descriptor
IOELV-STEL = 384 mg/m3
Modification of dose descriptor
None required (human inhalation exposure).
NOAELeye irritation = IOELV = 384 mg/m3
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV-STEL has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV-STEL has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The IOELV-STEL has therefore been taken as a human 15-min NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV-STEL to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELeye irritation = 384 mg/m3 / 1.7 = 226 mg/m3
Respiratory tract:
Toluene can cause respiratory irritation in animals but this has only been observed at very high concentrations. Respiratory irritation potential of toluene in humans is also considered to be a high concentration phenomenon but subjective sensations of “irritation to the throat” have been recorded in human volunteer studies with a LOAEC of 188 mg/m3 (Muttray et al, 2005). However these effects were subjective with no residual effects following completion of exposure and similar effects were not recorded in the chronic occupational exposure studies of Schaper et al, 2003, 2004 or Seeber et al, 2004. The data do not contradict the current IOELV, consequently, the established IOELV-STEL will be used as the basis for determining the acute respiratory irritation DNEL for the general population.
Dose descriptor
The IOELV-STEL of 384 mg/m3 will be used.
Modification of dose descriptor
Not modified
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV-STEL has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV-STEL has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The IOELV-STEL has therefore been taken as a human 15-min NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV-STEL to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELacute respiratory irrit = 384 mg/m3 / 1.7 = 226 mg/m3
Sensitization
No hazard with respect to skin or respiratory sensitization has been identified in animal studies or in humans and, consequently, no DNEL can or will be proposed.
Long-term systemic effects
The potential of a substance to cause long-term systemic effects can be judged based on the results of repeated dose (neuro)toxicity and reproductive (fertility, developmental) testing.
For toluene, the following NOAECs are presented in the IUCLID dossier:
sub-chronic effects: rat NOAEC = 625 mg/kg/day
chronic effects: rat NOAEC = 1131 mg/m3
chronic effects: human NOAEC = 98 mg/m3
reproductive effects: rats NOAEC = 2261 mg/m3
developmental toxicity: rat NOAEC = 2261 mg/m3
However the values presented above are for information only as the DNEL for long-term systemic effects (all routes) will be based on the IOELV, as explained above.
Documentation supporting the IOELV states that in standard animal studies, no significant evidence of systemic toxicity was observed upon repeated, prolonged exposure to concentrations up to at least 300 ppm (1149 mg/m3) toluene vapour, with ototoxicity apparent in rats exposed repeatedly to 1000 ppm (3840 mg/m3) and above. The SCOEL recommendation was therefore based on human data indicating possible changes in neurobehavior with a LOAEL of about 75 ppm (237 mg/m3), while data on the subjective effects suggested a LOAEL of about 60 ppm (230 mg/m3). In contrast, studies describing effects at lower exposures were considered less reliable due to issues with exposure characterisation. Overall, SCOEL concluded that a great deal of human data was available, which produce no reliable evidence of effects at or below toluene concentrations of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3). Therefore the IOELV was set at 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) for the 8 hour TWA.
A STEL (15 min) of 100 ppm (384 mg/m3; based on toxicokinetic considerations and human experimental data) was proposed to limit peaks of exposure which might lead to short-term neurobehavioural effects.
New studies not referenced in the SCOEL evaluation but summarised in the IUCLID dataset for toluene are those of Seeber et al (2004) and Schaper et al (2003; 2004; 2008). There was no evidence from these more recent reports that long-term exposure to toluene at 26 ppm (98 mg/m3) for 21 years had any effects on cognitive function (Seeber et al, 2004), ototoxicity (Schaper et al (2003; 2008) or colour vision (Schaper et al 2004). These studies demonstrate that adverse changes do not occur when exposures are maintained below the current occupational exposure limit of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3).
Oral:
Dose descriptor
The IOELV of 192 mg/m3 will be used.
Modification of dose descriptor
Correct the IOELV to an oral NOAEL (mg/kg/day) by converting the dose absorbed after inhalation into a systemic dose, assuming 50% uptake by the lung and 100% uptake from the GI tract:
Oral NOAEL = IOELV x wRV8-hour x [50/100] = [IOELV x wRV8-hour x 50/100] = 192 x 0.144 x 0.5 = 13.8 mg/kg bw/d
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELl-t oral = 13.8 mg/kg bw/d / 1.7 = 8.13 mg/kg bw
Dermal:
The IOELV of 192 mg/m3 will be used.
Modification of dose descriptor
Correct the IOELV to an dermal NOAEL (mg/kg/day) by converting the dose absorbed after inhalation into a systemic dose, assuming 50% uptake by the lung and 3.6% uptake by skin (ten Berge, 2009):
Dermal NOAEL = IOELV x wRV8-hour x 50/3.6 = 192 x 0.144 x 13.89 = 384 mg/kg bw
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELl-t dermal =384 mg/kg bw/d / 1.7 = 226 mg/kg bw, once per week
Inhalation:
The IOELV was determined on the basis of “a great deal of human data is available, which produce no reliable evidence of effects at or below toluene concentrations of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3).” Since no new scientific information has been obtained under REACH which changes this assessment, the established IOELV of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) – 8 hr TWA will be used as the starting point for developing a chronic inhalation DNEL for the general population.
Dose descriptor
A DNEL based on the IOELV of 192 mg/m3 will be used.
Modification of dose descriptor
The dose descriptor has been modified to take into account the different duration of exposure experienced by workers (8-hours) versus the chronic exposure experienced by the general population (24-hours).
Inhalation NOAEL = IOELV x (wRV8-hour / sRV24-hour) = 192 x (0.144 / 0.288 2) = 96 mg/m3
Assessment factors
Assessment factors are not required when a worker DNEL is based upon an IOELV, however one is included here to reflect uncertainty when moving from the IOELV to the general population.
The worker IOELV has been used as the starting point when deriving this DNEL for the general population. This is considered scientifically justifiable since information supporting the IOELV has been examined for consistency and biological plausibility by Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL), with only robust data used in the limit setting process. Furthermore, the use of a common starting point for both population groups also results in greater consistency in outcome than would be the case if different starting points and methods of assessment had been used. The magnitude of the IOELV was further modified to take into account differences in duration of exposure experienced by workers and the general population. The IOELV has therefore been taken as a human 8-hr NAEL, which (after modification through use of an assessment factor) would be broadly applicable to the general population. An assessment factor of 1.7 (reflecting the ratio between an intra-species AF of 5 for the general population and an intra-species AF of 3 for workers), was used to adapt the IOELV to the general population. Selection of these assessment factors was based on analyses of the scientific literature conducted by ECETOC (2003, 2010), which concluded that their magnitude was adequate to account for the distribution of variability in toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic parameters present in human populations of different ages, genders and disease states.
DNELl-t inhal = 96 mg/m3 / 1.7 = 56.5 mg/m3
Reproductive and developmental effects
Documentation supporting the IOELV concluded that animal data provide no evidence that toluene expresses effects on the gonads or fertility.
In relation to developmental toxicity, documentation supporting the IOELV notes that animal developmental studies show some evidence of a weak effect in rats (but not mice or rabbits) at near-maternally toxic exposures above 400 ppm (1532 mg/m3), while information suggesting a higher abortion rate in pregnant women exposed to an average of 88 ppm (337 mg m3) toluene vapour was balanced by normal birth outcomes for women deliberately or accidentally exposed to high levels of toluene during pregnancy. Documentation supporting the IOELV indicates that SCOEL has access to the draft risk assessment report for toluene, and was therefore aware of the background information contained therein.
New information from Saillenfait et al. (2007), who reported a NOAEC of 500 ppm (1880 mg/m3) does not materially alter this position i.e. the NOAEC is consistent with that of Thiel and Chahoud (1997) which was considered a key animal study in the risk assessment report.
Human data considered by the EU RAR to suggest “an increased risk of late spontaneous abortions associated with exposure to toluene at levels around 88 ppm (range 50-150 ppm)” (i.e. Ng et al., 1992) were also known to SCOEL and are discussed in the IOELV support document, however the Committee observed that abortions have not been reported upon accidental high exposure or toluene abuse by pregnant women and that an exposure limit of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) would be protective.
Since no new scientific information has been obtained under REACH which changes this assessment, the established IOELV of 50 ppm (192 mg/m3) – 8 hr TWA will be used as the starting point for developing a DNEL for reproductive and developmental effects for the general population.
The process for DNEL derivation leads to a result that is identical to that for long-term systemic effects after inhalation, therefore a DNEL of 56.5 mg/m3 is proposed.
DNELreproductive/developmental = DNEL l-t inhalation = 56.5 mg/m3
Long-term local effects
Inhalation:
Toluene can cause respiratory irritation in animals but this has only been observed at very high concentrations. Respiratory irritation potential of toluene in humans is also considered to be a high concentration phenomenon but subjective sensations of “irritation to the throat” have been recorded in a human volunteer study with a LOAEC of 188 mg/m3 (Muttray et al, 2005). However these effects were subjective with no residual effects following completion of exposure and similar effects were not recorded in the chronic occupational exposure studies of Schaper et al, 2003, 2004 or Seeber et al, 2004. It is considered that the proposed long-term systemic DNEL for the general population is sufficiently protective for local respiratory effects, therefore a DNEL of 56.5 mg/m3 is proposed.
DNELlt respiratory irrit = DNEL l-t inhalation = 56.5 mg/m3
Dermal:
No information is available to characterise the repeated local effects of toluene on the skin, while route-to-route extrapolation (respiratory tract to skin) is not appropriate. No conclusion can therefore be reached for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)