Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-906-4 | CAS number: 3277-26-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1980-11-26 to 1981-09-28
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Genotoxicity studies on selected organosilicon compounds: in vivo assays.
- Author:
- Isquith, A. et al.
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Food Chem Toxicol 26: 263-266
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only male animals used. Number of cells counted for determination of mitotic index not indicated - probably ca. 100, should be 1000
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed according to the Rodent Bone Marrow Cytogenetic Assay as recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee on Chromosome Methodologies in Mutagen Testing (Toxicology and Applied Pharm 22: 269-275, 1972) with modifications per the EPA Gene-Tox Program Cytogenetics Committee (12/3 to 12/5, 1980, Washington D.C.).
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexamethyldisiloxane
- EC Number:
- 203-492-7
- EC Name:
- Hexamethyldisiloxane
- Cas Number:
- 107-46-0
- Molecular formula:
- C6H18OSi2
- IUPAC Name:
- hexamethyldisiloxane
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 14 - 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 250 - 280 g for range finding. 290 - 430 g for cytogenetic study
- Housing: 6 per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Charles River Agway
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 68 ± 3 °F (20 ± 1.7 °C)
- Humidity (%): approx 50
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: paraffin oil
- Lot/batch no. (if required): A7M02
- Purity: Laboratory Grade - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single treatment
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single IP injection
- Post exposure period:
- 6, 24 and 48 hours
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 255 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 515 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 030 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males/dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide, positive control agent, was included in the 24-hour group.
- Route of administration: IP Injection
- Doses / concentrations: 22 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow from femur
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Based on two range finding studies conducted to determine the maximum dose the animals could tolerate.
Range finding studies: Range finding study 1: Animals Injected intraperitoneally with 1676, 504, 168 and 50 mg/kg and observed once a day for 7 days for signs of toxicity. Range finding study 2: 10 animals injected with 3911, 1825, 521, 183 and 52 mg/kg. In main study animals were sacrificed at 6, 24 and 48 hours
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Approximately 4 slides were prepared for each animal. The chromosomes were prepared by standard methods and Giemsa stained.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
6h group: Stock solution of 321 mg/ml; volumes injected were 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 ml, resulting in the following doses calculated from body weight: 1030 mg/kg +/- 3.2%; 515 mg/kg +/- 5.6%; 255 mg/kg +/- 1.2%
24 hour group: animals were injected with 1.0 or 0.5 ml of 321 mg/ml stock solution, or 1.0 ml of 91 mg/ml stock solution, resulting in the following doses calculated from body weight: 1030 mg/kg +/- 0.8%; 515 mg/kg +/- 5.6%; 255 mg/kg +/- 3.1%
48 hour group: animals were injected with 1.0 or 0.45 ml of 426 mg/ml stock solution, or 1 ml of 102 mg/ml stock solution. This resulted in the following doses calculated from body weight: 1030 mg/kg +/- 3.1%; 515 mg/kg +/- 9.3%; 255 mg/kg +/- 2.4%
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: metaphase cells analysed by projecting the negatives with a darkroom enlarger onto a white counter
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- In general, a minimum of 100 metaphase cells from each animal were scored for incidence of chromosomal aberrations.
- Statistics:
- Statistical methods: Chi2 test for comparison of expected and observed distribution of the number of breaks; Wilcoxon test was used as a nonparametric test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- on mitotic index
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: Exp 1: 1676, 504, 168, 50 mg/kg. Exp 2: 3911, 1825, 521, 183, 52 mg/kg
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: No deaths observed in initial study. In second study 3 of 10 animals dosed with 3911 mg/kg died, while all the other animals survived till terminal sacrifice.
- Harvest times: 7 days exp 1, 14 days exp 2.
- High dose with and without activation: 1676 exp 1, 3911 exp 2
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
See table 1
Any other information on results incl. tables
Negative controls: frequencies of breaks were 0.54%, 2.49% and 1.47% at sacrifice at 6, 24 and 48 hours respectively.
Table 1:Results of chromosome analysis in rat bone marrow cells
|
Low dose (255 mg/kg bw) |
Mid dose (515 mg/kg bw) |
High dose (1030 mg/kg bw) |
|||||||
Sampling time (h) |
6 |
24 |
48 |
6 |
24 |
48 |
6 |
24 |
48 |
|
Number of cells evaluated |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
500 approx |
|
Toxicity,specify effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chromosome aberrations |
Gaps |
6 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
25 |
2 |
12 |
14 |
Breaks |
5 |
2 |
9 |
10 |
15 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Other aberrations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mitotic index (% range) |
2 – 5 |
2 - 5 |
1 - 4 |
2 - 4 |
2 - 5 |
4 - 7 |
1 - 6 |
3 - 5 |
2 - 5 |
|
Polyploidy |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
|
Endo reduplication |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R |
N.R = Not Reported
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Hexamethyldisiloxane has been tested for the induction of chromosome aberrations in rat bone marrow cells in a valid study. It did not induce chromosomal damage in the bone marrow cells of rats following i.p. injection. The test substance is considered to be non-clastogenic (negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations) in rat bone marrow cells under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.