Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 445-760-8 | CAS number: 122886-55-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- November 06, 2002 - December 12, 2002
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This study has been performed according to OECD and/or EC guidelines and according to GLP principles. Deviations: - The highest recommended dose-level (5000 µg/plate) was not tested as the test item was not soluble in the vehicle usually used in this test and no homogeneous suspension could be obtained in the vehicle usually used in this test, the suspension in ethanol shows white particles which may interfere with the scoring. Therefore, a test item extract in ethanol was tested and the dose-levels were expressed as µL of test item extract in ethanol. - The negative control values were not within the laboratory historical control data ranges (first experiment: TA 1535 -/+S9, TA 98 -/+S9, TA 100 -/+S9 and TA 102 +S9; second experiment: TA 1537 -S9, TA 98 +S9, TA 100 +S9 and TA 102 +S9) (historical profile between 20-03-2001 and 15-02-2002). These minor deviations were not considered to have compromised the validity or integrity of the study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- the dose-level (5000 µg/plate) was not tested as the test item was not soluble and no homogeneous suspension could be obtained in the vehicle usually used in this test. Therefore, a test item extract in ethanol was used for treatment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- the dose-level (5000 µg/plate) was not tested as the test item was not soluble and no homogeneous suspension could be obtained in the vehicle usually used in this test. Therefore, a test item extract in ethanol was used for treatment.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 451-060-3
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 122886-55-9
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C31H48N4O2 CAS formula: C31H48N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N’’-(methylenedi-4,1-phenylene)bis(N’-octylurea)
- Reference substance name:
- N-{4-[(4-{[(octadecylamino)carbonyl]amino}phenyl)methyl]phenyl}-N’-octylurea
- Cas Number:
- 117328-86-6
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C41H68N4O2 CAS formula: C41H68N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- N-{4-[(4-{[(octadecylamino)carbonyl]amino}phenyl)methyl]phenyl}-N’-octylurea
- Reference substance name:
- 3,3'-dioctadecyl-1,1'-methylenebis(4,1-phenylene)diurea
- EC Number:
- 406-690-3
- EC Name:
- 3,3'-dioctadecyl-1,1'-methylenebis(4,1-phenylene)diurea
- Cas Number:
- 43136-14-7
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C51H88N4O2 CAS formula: C51H88N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N’’-(methylenedi-4,1-phenylene)bis(N’-octadecylurea)
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): KY-EU
- Appearance: white powder
- Storage condition of test material: in darkness at room temperature
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine gene
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9-mix induced with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test:
Without and with S9-mix:
S. typhimurium TA 98 , TA 100 and TA 102: 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 µL of test item extract in ethanol/plate
Mutagenicity experiment 1 and 2:
Without and with S9-mix:
S. typhimurium TA 98 , TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 102: 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µL of test item extract in ethanol/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item being insoluble in most vehicle used in this kind of study (water, dimethylsulfoxide, ethanol, acetone and tetrahydrofuran), an extract in ethanol was tested. The dose-levels were expressed as µL of test item extract in ethanol.
The test item was suspended in ethanol at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. This suspension was incubated for approximately 14 hours, at 37°C under shaking. Then the suspension was centrifuged at approximately 2500 rpm during 6 minutes. The supernatant was removed and used for treatment. The preparations were made immediately before use.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 1 µg/plate in dimethylsulfoxide for TA 100 and TA 1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 50 µg/plate in dimethylsulfoxide for TA 1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.5 µg/plate in dimethylsulfoxide for TA 98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.5 µg/plate in distilled water for TA 102
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthramine 2 µg/plate in dimethylsulfoxide for TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537
- Remarks:
- with S9
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthramine 10 µg/plate in dimethylsulfoxide for TA 102
- Remarks:
- with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: The preliminary test, both experiments without S9 mix and the first experiment with S9 mix: in agar (plate incorporation);the second experiment with S9: preincubation.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Preliminary test: one plate/dose-level, two independent main experiments: three plates/dose-level.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Not indicated
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: the evaluation of the toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- The presence of precipitation of the test compound on the plates was determined. - Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible 2-fold increase (for the TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 strains) or 3-fold increase (for the TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains) in the number of revertants compared with the vehicle controls, in any strain at any dose-level and/or evidence of a dose-relationship was considered as a positive result. Reference to historical data, or other considerations of biological relevance may also be taken into account in the evaluation of the data obtained.
- Statistics:
- Not performed.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- other: see "additional information on results"
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: In the preliminary toxicity test, no precipitate was observed in the petri plates when scoring the revertants at all dose-levels.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- No noteworthy toxicity was noted towards the three strains used, with and without S9 mix.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- The strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges.
- The negative control values were not within the laboratory historical control data ranges (first experiment: TA 1535 -/+S9, TA 98 -/+S9, TA 100 -/+S9 and TA 102 +S9; second experiment: TA 1537 -S9, TA 98 +S9, TA 100 +S9 and TA 102 +S9) (historical profile between 20-03-2001 and 15-02-2002). These minor deviations were not considered to have compromised the validity or integrity of the study.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- No toxicity was noted towards all the strains used, both with and without S9 mix.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Tables with results and historical control data see the attached background material.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
KY-EU was tested in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay with TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100, TA 98 and TA 102 according to OECD Guideline 471 and GLP principles.
KY-EU did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant colonies in each of the five strains both with and without S9 mix, to concentrations up to and including the highest concentration tested due to precipitation of the test substance. These results were confirmed in a independently repeated experiment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.