Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 246-669-4 | CAS number: 25152-85-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (OECD TG 471): Negative
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental phase was performed between 07 November 2012 and 25 January 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- - S. typhimurium: Histidine gene
- E. coli: Tryptophan gene - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbitone and ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Dose range finding test: Pre-incubation method
TA 100 with S9-mix, WP2uvrA with and without S9-mix: 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
TA 100 without S9-mix: 0, 5, 15, 50, 150 and 500 µg/plate
- Experiment 1: Pre-incubation method
TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA98 (with S9-mix): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 µg/plate
TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA98 (without S9-mix): 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15 and 50 µg/plate
WP2uvrA (with S9-mix): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
WP2uvrA (without S9-mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 and 500 µg/plate
- Experiment 2: Pre-incubation method
The test item dose range was amended slightly, following results of Experiment 1 and was as follows:
TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA98 (with S9-mix): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 µg/plate
TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA98 (without S9-mix): 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 and 15 µg/plate
WP2uvrA (with S9-mix): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
WP2uvrA (without S9-mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50 and 150 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/ml in solubility checks performed in-house. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (untreated plates, plate incorporation method)
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (100 µL/plate DMSO)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- Preliminary toxicity test, Experiment 1 and 2: pre-incubation method
DURATION
- Exposure duration: pre-incubation for 20 minutes, incubation for approximately 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Doses of the test substance were tested in triplicate in each strain, with or without S9, in experiment 1 and 2.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: on the basis of a reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn. - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
- A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested.
- A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
- Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
- Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS.
- Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response)
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No test-item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- The test-item was toxic to TA100 from 15 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and 500 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix and non-toxic to WP2uvrA. The test item formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) were considered to be acceptable. The solvent control values were within the historical control values. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- The test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella tester strains, initially from 5 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and 150 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. No toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA dosed in the presence of S9-mix although weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to the same strain in the absence of S9-mix at and above 50 µg/plate. The sensitivity of the tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied both between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experiment number. The test item was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate or the toxic limit, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate; all were found to be satisfactory. The amino acid supplemented top agar and S9-mix used in both experiments was shown to be sterile. The culture density for each bacterial strain was also checked and considered acceptable. - Conclusions:
- The substance is not mutagenic in the reverse mutation assay using Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli strains, performed according to OECD 471.
- Executive summary:
The mutagenic activity of the substance was evaluated in accordance with OECD 471 and according to GLP principles. The test was performed in two independent experiments using the pre-incubation method at up to seven dose levels, in triplicate, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The dose levels for the first experiment were selected based on observed cytotoxicity in the preliminary toxicity study and ranged between 0.05 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The second experiment was performed using a similar, slightly amended, dose range to the first experiment. The test substance was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate or the toxic limit, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. Adequate negative and positive controls were included. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the S. typhimurium strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) or E. coli strain (WP2uvrA), with any dose of the test substance, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the results of this study the substance is considered to be non- mutagenic in the reverse mutation assay using Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli strains.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Ames: The mutagenic activity of the substance was evaluated in accordance with OECD 471 and according to GLP principles. The test was performed in two independent experiments using the pre-incubation method at up to seven dose levels, in triplicate, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The dose levels for the first experiment were selected based on observed cytotoxicity in the preliminary toxicity study and ranged between 0.05 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The second experiment was performed using a similar, slightly amended, dose range to the first experiment. The test substance was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate or the toxic limit, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. Adequate negative and positive controls were included. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the S. typhimurium strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) or E. coli strain (WP2uvrA), with any dose of the test substance, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the results of this study the substance is considered to be non- mutagenic in the reverse mutation assay using Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli strains.
In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test: In the database of the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials confidential information is available on an in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test, using isolated human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) in both the absence and presence of an Aroclor-induced S9 activation system, was performed according to OECD 487 and GLP (Roy, 2013). Under the conditions of the study, the test material was negative for the induction of micronuclei in both non-activated and S9-activated test systems in the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test using human peripheral blood lymphocytes. In view of the negative results this does have an impact on the classification and is therefore not included in the present dossier.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of the Ames test, the substance does not have to be classified for mutagenicity in accordance with EU CLP (EC) 1272/2008 and its amendments.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.