Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-026-4 | CAS number: 16957-70-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
For Fragarone the following results were derived:
Species |
Guideline / Method |
Result |
Remarks |
Daphnia magna |
Read across from Methacrylic acid |
48-h EC50: >130 mg/L, not corrected for MW and log Kow because it is a > value and not critical |
Key study, Rel. 2. Value derived from read-across to Methacrylic acid (CAS# 79 -41 -4), tested in a study equivalent to OECDTG 202 |
Green algae (P. subcapitata) |
Read across from Methacrylic acid |
72-h ErC50: 29 mg/L 72 -h NOErC: 5.3 mg/L |
Key study, Rel. 2. The effect values have been corrected for difference in log Kow and molecular weight. Values derived from read-across to Methacrylic acid (CAS# 79 -41 -4), which was tested in an OECDTG 201. |
* not corrected for differences in log Kow and molecular weight between the source and target chemical as the data is qualitative (i.e. 'higher than').
Aquatic toxicity ofFragarone (CAS# 16957-70-3) based on read across from data available for Methacrylic acid (CAS# 79-41-4).
Introduction and hypothesis for the analogue approach
Fragarone is a 2-pentenoic acid which is methylated at the 2 position.No experimental aquatic toxicity data are available for Fragarone. For the assessment of the aquatic toxicity of Fragarone, read-across is performed to the close structural analogue Methacrylic acid. In accordance with Article 13 of REACH, lacking information may be generated by other means, i.e. applying alternative methods such as in vitro tests, QSARs, grouping and read-across. For assessing the aquatic toxicity of Fragarone the analogue approach is selected because for a closely related analogue, Methacrylic acid, reliableaquatic toxicitydata are available which can be used for read across.
Hypothesis: Fragarone has similar aquatic toxicity potential as the read-across sourceMethacrylic acid
Available information:For the source chemicalMethacrylic acid the 48-h EC50 for daphnids is >130 mg/L. The 72-h ErC50 and 72-h NOErC values are 45 mg/L and 8.2 mg/L, respectively.
In more detail:
Theshort-term toxicity to daphnidswas examined in a study according to EAP OTS 797-1300 (equivalent to OECD TG 202), and in compliance with GLP criteria (MPA, 1990). Groups of 40 Daphnia magna (4 replicates of 10 animals) were exposed to nominal test substance concentrations 0 (control), 7.2, 14, 30, 60 and 120 mg/L for 48 hours under flow-through conditions. Test substance was analysed and mean measured concentrations were determined as 6.7, 13, 32, 62 and 130 mg/L. Daphnia mobility was recorded. The 48-h EC50 was determined at >130 mg/L based on mean measured concentrations.
The algae toxicitywas investigated in a study according to OECD TG 201 and in compliance with GLP criteria (MTX, 1999). Cultures of freshwater algae (P. subcapitata) were exposed to nominal test substance concentrations of 0 (control), 0.86, 1.9, 4.1, 9.1, 20, 45 and 100 mg/L in closed vessels for 72 hours under static conditions. Test substance analysis was performed and geometric mean measured values determined as 0.85, 2.0, 3.7, 8.2, 19, 45 and 100 mg/L (88 -105% of nominal). Cell counts were made at 24, 48 and 72 hours after start of exposure and algal growth rate determined. The 72 -h ErC50 and 72 -h NOErC values were determined as 45 mg/L and 8.2 mg/L, respectively, based on geometric mean measured concentrations.
Target chemical and source chemical(s)
Chemical structures of the target chemical and the source chemical are shown in the data matrix, including physico-chemical properties and available ecotoxicological information.
Purity / Impurities
Both Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are mono-constituent substances with purities close to 100%. Neither Fragarone nor Methacrylic acid contain any impurities that are considered to impact the assessment of aquatic toxicity from read across.
Analogue approach justification
According to Annex XI 1.5 read across can be used to replace testing when the similarity can be based on a common backbone and a common functional group. When using read across the result derived should be applicable for C&L and/or risk assessment and it should be presented with adequate and reliable documentation. The latter is presented in the current document.
Analogue selection: For Fragarone the analogueMethacrylic acid was found for assessing the aquatic toxicity because these two shares a common structural backbone, identical functional group (carboxylic acid) and for Methacrylic acid aquatic toxicity information is available.
Structural similarities and differences: Fragarone andMethacrylic acid have the same methyl-alkene backbone and have the same carboxylic acid as a functional group. The difference is that Fragarone has a two C longer hydrocarbon backbone (2-pentene vs. 2-propene).
Bioavailability:Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are similarbioavailable based on the similarity in chemical structures and physico-chemical properties: Both substances have water solubilities of >>1000 mg/L, log Kow values of <<3 and pKas around 4.5.
Reactivity: Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are both conjugated acids and are therefore categorised in the OECD Toolbox (4.2) as unspecific reactive by Verhaar and OASIS.
Conversion of the effect values from Methacrylic acid to Fragarone: As the aquatic toxicity potential of substances generally increases with increasing log Kow, Fragarone may be expected to be the more toxic substance of the two. Considering that the difference in log Kow is >0.5, the log Kow values of Fragarone and Methacrylic acid will be used for conversion of the toxicity values after an adjustment for molecular weight (as has been done during a Caracal meeting for nonanoic acid, Caracal, 2013).
Effect value Fragarone in mg/L = (45 mg/l / 86 MW, effect value of Methacrylic acid in mmol/L x (0.93, log Kow Methacrylic acid/ 1.9 Log Kow Fragarone) x 114 MW of Fragarone).
The Daphnia result will not be converted because this is a > value.
Uncertainty of the prediction:There are no uncertainties other than those already discussed above.
Conclusions for hazard assessment and risk assessment
For Fragarone no experimental aquatic toxicity information is available. Methacrylic acid information is used for read across. The algae ErC50 and NOEC of Methacrylic acid are 45 an 8.2 mg/l, respectively. For Daphnia the result is > 130 mg/l. Only the algae data will need to be corrected for difference in molecular weight and log Kow for the risk assessment, resulting in 29 and 5.3 mg/L, respectively.
Final conclusion on hazard: Fragarone has an EC50 Daphnia > 130 mg/l and an ErC50 and NOEC algae of 29 and 5.3 mg/l.
Data matrix presenting the information relevant for read across of Fragarone from Methacrylic acid
Common name |
Fragarone |
Methacrylic acid |
|
Target |
Source |
Chemical name |
(E)-2-methylpent-2-en-1-oic acid |
2-methylprop-2-enoic acid |
Chemical structures |
||
CAS # |
16957-70-3 |
79-41-4 |
EC # |
241-026-4 |
201-204-4 |
Empirical formula |
C6H10O2 |
C4H6O2 |
SMILES |
O=C(C(=CCC)C)O |
CC(=C)C(O)=O |
Physico-chemical data |
|
|
Molecular weight |
114 |
86 |
Physical state |
Liquid |
Liquid |
Vp (Pa) |
1.63 |
97 |
Ws (mg/L) |
7858 |
98000 |
Log Kow |
1.9 |
0.93 |
pKa |
4.34 (SPARC calculation) |
4.66 (SIDS)# |
Fate and behaviour |
|
|
Biodegradation |
Read across |
Readily biodegradable (OECD TG 301D) |
Aquatic toxicity |
|
|
Daphnia 48-h EC50: |
>130 mg/L, not corrected because it is a > value |
Used for read-across: >130 mg/L
|
Algae 72-h ErC50:
72-h NOErC: |
Read-across from Methacrylic acid: 29 mg/L (= 0.52 mmol/L * 0.93/1.9 (log Kow) * 114 (MW)) 5.3 mg/L (= 0.095 mmol/L * 0.93/1.9 (log Kow) * 114 (MW))
|
45 mg/L (= 0.52 mmol/L)
8.2 mg/L (= 0.095 mmol/L)
|
# SIDS document on Methacrylic acid:http://www.inchem.org/documents/sids/sids/79414.pdf
Additional information
The executive summaries of the Daphnia and the algae studies are presented in the respective Enpoint summaries of these species. The read across rationale is presented below.
Aquatic toxicity of Fragarone (CAS# 16957-70-3) based on read across from data available for Methacrylic acid (CAS# 79-41-4).
Introduction and hypothesis for the analogue approach
Fragarone is a 2-pentenoic acid which is methylated at the 2 position.No experimental aquatic toxicity data are available for Fragarone. For the assessment of the aquatic toxicity of Fragarone, read-across is performed to the close structural analogue Methacrylic acid. In accordance with Article 13 of REACH, lacking information may be generated by other means, i.e. applying alternative methods such as in vitro tests, QSARs, grouping and read-across. For assessing the aquatic toxicity of Fragarone the analogue approach is selected because for a closely related analogue, Methacrylic acid, reliableaquatic toxicitydata are available which can be used for read across.
Hypothesis: Fragarone has similar aquatic toxicity potential as the read-across sourceMethacrylic acid
Available information:For the source chemicalMethacrylic acid the 48-h EC50 for daphnids is >130 mg/L. The 72-h ErC50 and 72-h NOErC values are 45 mg/L and 8.2 mg/L, respectively.
In more detail:
Theshort-term toxicity to daphnidswas examined in a study according to EAP OTS 797-1300 (equivalent to OECD TG 202), and in compliance with GLP criteria (MPA, 1990). Groups of 40 Daphnia magna (4 replicates of 10 animals) were exposed to nominal test substance concentrations 0 (control), 7.2, 14, 30, 60 and 120 mg/L for 48 hours under flow-through conditions. Test substance was analysed and mean measured concentrations were determined as 6.7, 13, 32, 62 and 130 mg/L. Daphnia mobility was recorded. The 48-h EC50 was determined at >130 mg/L based on mean measured concentrations.
The algae toxicitywas investigated in a study according to OECD TG 201 and in compliance with GLP criteria (MTX, 1999). Cultures of freshwater algae (P. subcapitata) were exposed to nominal test substance concentrations of 0 (control), 0.86, 1.9, 4.1, 9.1, 20, 45 and 100 mg/L in closed vessels for 72 hours under static conditions. Test substance analysis was performed and geometric mean measured values determined as 0.85, 2.0, 3.7, 8.2, 19, 45 and 100 mg/L (88 -105% of nominal). Cell counts were made at 24, 48 and 72 hours after start of exposure and algal growth rate determined. The 72 -h ErC50 and 72 -h NOErC values were determined as 45 mg/L and 8.2 mg/L, respectively, based on geometric mean measured concentrations.
Target chemical and source chemical(s)
Chemical structures of the target chemical and the source chemical are shown in the data matrix, including physico-chemical properties and available ecotoxicological information.
Purity / Impurities
Both Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are mono-constituent substances with purities close to 100%. Neither Fragarone nor Methacrylic acid contain any impurities that are considered to impact the assessment of aquatic toxicity from read across.
Analogue approach justification
According to Annex XI 1.5 read across can be used to replace testing when the similarity can be based on a common backbone and a common functional group. When using read across the result derived should be applicable for C&L and/or risk assessment and it should be presented with adequate and reliable documentation. The latter is presented in the current document.
Analogue selection: For Fragarone the analogueMethacrylic acid was found for assessing the aquatic toxicity because these two shares a common structural backbone, identical functional group (carboxylic acid) and for Methacrylic acid aquatic toxicity information is available.
Structural similarities and differences: Fragarone andMethacrylic acid have the same methyl-alkene backbone and have the same carboxylic acid as a functional group. The difference is that Fragarone has a two C longer hydrocarbon backbone (2-pentene vs. 2-propene).
Bioavailability:Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are similarbioavailable based on the similarity in chemical structures and physico-chemical properties: Both substances have water solubilities of >>1000 mg/L, log Kow values of <<3 and pKas around 4.5.
Reactivity: Fragarone and Methacrylic acid are both conjugated acids and are therefore categorised in the OECD Toolbox (4.2) as unspecific reactive by Verhaar and OASIS.
Conversion of the effect values from Methacrylic acid to Fragarone: As the aquatic toxicity potential of substances generally increases with increasing log Kow, Fragarone may be expected to be the more toxic substance of the two. Considering that the difference in log Kow is >0.5, the log Kow values of Fragarone and Methacrylic acid will be used for conversion of the toxicity values after an adjustment for molecular weight (as has been done during a Caracal meeting for nonanoic acid, Caracal, 2013).
Effect value Fragarone in mg/L = (45 mg/l / 86 MW, effect value of Methacrylic acid in mmol/L x (0.93, log Kow Methacrylic acid/ 1.9 Log Kow Fragarone) x 114 MW of Fragarone). The Daphnia result will not be converted because this is a > value.
Uncertainty of the prediction:There are no uncertainties other than those already discussed above.
Conclusions for hazard assessment and risk assessment
For Fragarone no experimental aquatic toxicity information is available. Methacrylic acid information is used for read across. The algae ErC50 and NOEC of Methacrylic acid are 45 an 8.2 mg/l, respectively. For Daphnia the result is > 130 mg/l. Only the algae data will need to be corrected for difference in molecular weight and log Kow for the risk assessment, resulting in 29 and 5.3 mg/L, respectively.
Final conclusion on hazard: Fragarone has an EC50 Daphnia > 130 mg/l and an ErC50 and NOEC algae of 29 and 5.3 mg/l.
Data matrix presenting the information relevant for read across of Fragarone from Methacrylic acid
Common name |
Fragarone |
Methacrylic acid |
|
Target |
Source |
Chemical name |
(E)-2-methylpent-2-en-1-oic acid |
2-methylprop-2-enoic acid |
Chemical structures |
||
CAS # |
16957-70-3 |
79-41-4 |
EC # |
241-026-4 |
201-204-4 |
Empirical formula |
C6H10O2 |
C4H6O2 |
SMILES |
O=C(C(=CCC)C)O |
CC(=C)C(O)=O |
Physico-chemical data |
|
|
Molecular weight |
114 |
86 |
Physical state |
Liquid |
Liquid |
Vp (Pa) |
1.63 |
97 |
Ws (mg/L) |
7858 |
98000 |
Log Kow |
1.9 |
0.93 |
pKa |
4.34 (SPARC calculation) |
4.66 (SIDS)# |
Fate and behaviour |
|
|
Biodegradation |
Read across |
Readily biodegradable (OECD TG 301D) |
Aquatic toxicity |
|
|
Daphnia 48-h EC50: |
>130 mg/L, not corrected because it is a > value |
Used for read-across: >130 mg/L
|
Algae 72-h ErC50:
72-h NOErC: |
Read-across from Methacrylic acid: 29 mg/L (= 0.52 mmol/L * 0.93/1.9 (log Kow) * 114 (MW)) 5.3 mg/L (= 0.095 mmol/L * 0.93/1.9 (log Kow) * 114 (MW)) |
45 mg/L (= 0.52 mmol/L)
8.2 mg/L (= 0.095 mmol/L)
|
# SIDS document on Methacrylic acid:http://www.inchem.org/documents/sids/sids/79414.pdf
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.