Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-956-7 | CAS number: 26748-47-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://poisoncentres.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Relevant data of skin sensitisation for the target substance 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl peroxyneodecanoate are available.
In a dermal sensitization study according to OECD 406 with a suspension of 1-Methyl-1-phenylethyl peroxyneodecanoate in corn oil, 15 male and 15 female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (3 months old) were tested using the Guinea Pig Maximisation Test according to Magnusson and Kligman. Based on the results from this study, the test item does not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- to 1998-10-19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 17 July 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Study report from 1998 readily available
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Name: LUPEROX 188 M 70 (or PEROXYNEODECANOATE DE CUMYLE)
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: XX200001 (supplied by Elf Atochem S.A.)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: September 1998
- Appearance: liquid
- Purity: 75.6% in isododecane
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at -20 °C and protected from light
Appearance: colourless liquid
Container: one plastic flask - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, 76410 Saint-Aubin-lés-Elbeuf, France.
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Microbiological status of animals, when known:
- Age at study initiation: approx. 3 months
- Weight at study initiation: 345 ± 12 g (males), 336 ± 8 g (females)
- Housing: animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages (48 cm x 27 cm x 20 cm) equipped with a polypropylene bottle.
Dust-free sawdust was provided as litter (SICSA, 92142 Alfortville, France).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): "106 pelleted diet" (UAR, 91360 Villemoisson-sur-Orge, France); ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Drinking water filtered by a FG Millipore membrane (0.22 micron) was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h - Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 mL of the test substance 10% (w/w) in corn oil/ see details on study design
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 1/single application
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: highest concentration evaluated in the pre-test
- Route:
- epicutaneous, open
- Vehicle:
- other: vaseline
- Concentration / amount:
- 10% (w/w)
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 7
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: topical application of sodium lauryl sulfate in vaseline to induce local irritation
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.5 ml of the undiluted test substance/see details on study design
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 8/single application, 48 hours
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest technically applicable concentration used
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.5 ml of the undiluted test substance
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 22/24 hours
- Adequacy of challenge:
- other: highest technical concentration used (undiluted)
- No. of animals per dose:
- in total 30 (15 males/15 females)
- control group: five males and 5 females
- treatment group: ten males and 10 females - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
A preliminary test was conducted in order to determine the concentrations to be tested in the main study.
By intradermal route:
- 24 hours before treatment, the dorsal region of the animals was clipped,
- intradermal administrations of the test substance formulation (0.1 mL) at different concentrations were performed in the interscapular region,
- cutaneous reactions were evaluated approximately 24, 48 hours and 6 days after the injections
By cutaneous route:
- 24 hours before treatment, both flank regions of the animals were clipped,
- 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance or test substance formulation at the chosen concentration were placed on a dry gauze pad (approximately 4 s) which was then applied to the skin and held in place by an occlusive dressing for 24 hours,
- cutaneous reactions were evaluated approximately 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressings
Criteria for selection of concentrations
The following criteria were used:
- the concentrations should be well-tolerated systemically and locally,
- intradermal injections should cause moderate irritant effects (no necrosis or ulceration of the skin)
- cutaneous application for the induction should cause at most weak or moderate skin reactions or be the maximal practicable concentration,
- cutaneous application for the challenge phase should be the highest concentration which does not cause irritant effects.
MAIN STUDY
- Application sites were clipped on days -1 and 7 (interscapular region 4 x 2 cm) and clipped and shaved on day 21 (each flank 2 x 2 cm)
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Intradermal route:
On day 1, six injections were made deep into the dermis of a 4 cm x 2 cm clipped interscapular area, using a needle (diameter: 0.50 x 16mm) mounted on a 1 mL glass syringe (0.01 mL graduations).
Three injections of 0.1 mL were made into each side of this interscapular region (i.e. three pairs ofsites), as follows:
- Anterior injection site: Treated group: Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA) diluted at 50% (v/v) with 0.9% NaCl; Control group: FCA diluted at 50% (v/v) with 0.9% NaCl
- Middle injection site: Treated group: Test substance at 10% (w/w) in corn oil; Control group: vehicle undiluted
- Posterior injection site: Treated group: Test substance at 10% (w/w) in a 1:1 mixture FCA/ 0.9% NaCl; Control group: Vehicle at 50% (w/w) in a 1:1 mixture FCA/ 0.9% NaCl. The test substance was suspended in FCA prior to combining with the aqueous phase.The final concentration of the test substance was equal to that used in the middle injection site.
Cutaneous route:
On day 7, the interscapular area was clipped. As the test substance was shown to be non-irritant during the preliminary test, the animals were treated with 0.5 mL of sodium lauryl sulfate (10%,w/w) in vaseline in order to induce local irritation.
On day 8, a cutaneous application to the region of the intradermal injections (4 cm x 2 cm) was performed as follows:
Control group
- application of 0.5 mL of the vehicle.
Treated group
-application of 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance.
The test substance or the vehicle was placed on a dry gauze pad, which was then applied to the interscapular region. The pad was held in place for 48 hours by means of an adhesive hypoallergenic dressing and an adhesive anallergenic waterproof plaster. On removal of the dressing, no residual test substance was observed. Cutaneous reactions were recorded 1 hour after removal of the occlusive dressing.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
On day 22, the animals of both groups received an application of 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance to the posterior right flank and 0.5 mL of the vehicle to the posterior left flank. This application was performed using a 1 mL plastic syringe (0.01 mL graduations). The test substance or the vehicle was placed on a dry gauze pad, which was then applied to a 4 cm² (2 cm x 2 cm) clipped area of the skin. The pads were held in contact with the skin for 24 hours by means of an occlusive, hypoallergenic dressing and an adhesive anallergenic waterproof plaster. On removal of the dressing, no residual test substance was observed.
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): Twenty-four and 48 hours after removal of the dressing of the challenge application, both flanks of the treated and control animals were observed to evaluate cutaneous reactions.
OTHER: Determination of the Allergenicity level:
The treated animals show a positive reaction if macroscopic cutaneous reactions are clearly visible (erythema and/or oedema greater or equal 2) and if the treated animals have a greater intensity or duration of response than the maximum reaction seen in control animals, or if macroscopic reactions are confirmed at microscopic examination as being due to the sensitisation process. - Challenge controls:
- 10 animals (5 male/5 female) previosly treated with the vehicle were challenged together with the test group using the same test article concentration as for the test group.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- DCNB and Mercaptobenzothiazole
- Positive control results:
- According to this study used the Magnusson and Kligman method, the test substance DNCB at the concentration of 1% (w/w) induced positive skin sensitization reactions in 90% of the guinea-pigs. 30% of the animals treated with mercaptobenzothiazole showed a sensitization response.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- undiluted
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- no clinical signs and no mortality were observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- undiluted
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- no clinical signs and no mortality were observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- undiluted
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- no clinical signs and no mortality were observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- undiluted
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- no clinical signs and no mortality were observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 1% DNCB
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 20% Mercaptobenzothiazole
- No. with + reactions:
- 3
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, in an in vivo skin sensitisation test conducted in accordance to OECD 406 the test material did not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
- Executive summary:
In an in vivo skin sensitization study conducted according to OECD 406 with the test item in corn oil, young adult Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (10/sex) were tested using the Guinea Pig Maximisation Test of Magnusson and Kligman. DCNB and mercaptobenzothiazole served as positive controls. On day 1, intradermal injections were performed using a 10% suspension of the test material. On day 8, an occlusive epicutaneous induction was performed with the undiluted test item. On day 22 all animals were challenged by a cutaneous application of the undiluted test item for 24 hours under occlusive conditions. Skin reactions were examined 24 and 48 h following removal of the dressing.
No clinical signs and no deaths were noted during the study. No well-defined cutaneous reactions were observed after the challenge application. Based on the results from this study, the test item did not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
Reference
Table 2: Individual results of the control group for skin reaction after challenge
Sex | Animal no. | 24 hours | 48 hours |
Male | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 1 | 0 | |
3 | 1 | 0 | |
4 | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | |
Female | 6 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 0 | 0 | |
8 | 0 | 0 | |
9 | 0 | 0 | |
10 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3: Individual results of the test group for skin reaction after challenge
Sex | Animal no. | 24 hours | 48 hours |
Male | 11 | 1 | 0 |
12 | 0 | 0 | |
13 | 0 | 0 | |
14 | 1 | 0 | |
15 | 0 | 0 | |
16 | 0 | 0 | |
17 | 0 | 0 | |
18 | 1 | 0 | |
19 | 1 | 0 | |
20 | 1 | 0 | |
Female | 21 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 1 | 0 | |
23 | 0 | 0 | |
24 | 1 | 0/Dryness of the skin | |
25 | 0 | 0 | |
26 | 0 | 0 | |
27 | 0 | 0 | |
28 | 1 | 0 | |
29 | 0 | 0 | |
30 | 0 | 0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
In an in vivo skin sensitization study conducted according to OECD 406 with the test item in corn oil, young adult Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (10/sex) were tested using the Guinea Pig Maximisation Test of Magnusson and Kligman. DCNB and mercaptobenzothiazole served as positive controls. On day 1, intradermal injections were performed using a 10% suspension of the test material. On day 8, an occlusive epicutaneous induction was performed with the undiluted test item. On day 22 all animals were challenged by a cutaneous application of the undiluted test item for 24 hours under occlusive conditions. Skin reactions were examined 24 and 48 h following removal of the dressing.
No clinical signs and no deaths were noted during the study. No well-defined cutaneous reactions were observed after the challenge application. Based on the results from this study, the test item does not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
In a dermal sensitization study conducted according to OECD 406, the target substance 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl peroxyneodecanoate did not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs. Based on the results, no classification for 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl peroxyneodecanoate is warranted in accordance with CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)