Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-986-8 | CAS number: 10482-56-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 November 2018 – 10 December 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0 (control), 3.2, 100 and 320 mg/L.
- Sampling method: 3 test concentrations along with the negative control were analyzed for the test item concentration at the beginning and at the end of the test. One test flask (1*100 mL) for each concentration was used for chemical analysis.An aliquot was sampled at the middle of the flask.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All the solutions were kept in refrigerator. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: The test item was soluble in the test medium (OECD TG 201 medium) with a mixing protocol carried out before the experimentation, according to the OECD nº23 guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difficult substances and mixtures.
The method consisted in stirring each test item nominal concentrations in test medium during 24 hours, in the dark and 20±2ºC prepared by adding directly the test item in flasks containing test medium. For technical feasibility issues, the concentration 3.2 mg/L was diluted from the concentration 320 mg/L. After this step, a settling period of 30 minutes was performed before sampling. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: chlorococcal order strain number CCAP 278.4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Not reported.
- Method of cultivation: Not reported.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Not reported.
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): The algae cultures were stored in the laboratory on a solid medium (LC/agar Petri plates) and in a liquid medium with regular sub-culturing (every week).
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: Not reported. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Test temperature:
- 22.7ºC - 23.1ºC
- pH:
- 7.6 - 8.2
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0 (control), 3.2, 10, 32, 100 and 320 mg/L.
Measured concentrations for 0, 3.2, 100 and 320 mg/L (initial time, T0h): <1 (control), 2.16, 78.6 and 250 mg/L.
Measured concentrations for 0, 3.2, 100 and 320 mg/L (final time, T72h): <1 (control), 2.57, 77.5 and 257 mg/L. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: erlenmeyer flask
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 250 mL capacity, 100 mL fill volume.
- Aeration: Not specified.
- Initial cells density: 10E+04 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 168.8 x 10E+04 cells/mL (average)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): Not applicable
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes (OECD TG 201 medium)
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: the OECD medium was prepared as per the OECD guideline 201.
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
- Intervals of water quality measurement: The pH of the controls and the test solutions was checked at the beginning and at the end of the test. Temperature inside the algal chamber was recorded twice daily.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: Constant illumination
- Light intensity and quality: 5924 Lux.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable):
- Determination of cell concentrations: Beckman Coulter Z2 and Malassez counting cell (observation times: 24, 48 and 72 hours)
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: geometric factor of 3.2
- Justification for using less concentrations than requested by guideline: Not applicable; 5 concentrations used for the main test.
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0 (control), 1, 10 and 100 mg/L.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: At the tested concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, the average inhibition growth rate was calculated to be 6.6%, 5.3% and 45.1% respectively. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- (potassium dichromate)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 124 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Confidence interval = [113 – 127]
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 22 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Confidence interval = [20 – 24]
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 41 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: Confidence interval = [34 – 48]
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- < 3.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lowest tested concentration (= 1.90 mg/L by calculation, for information)
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on significant difference compared to control observed at the concentration 10 mg/L (Statistical significance determined with the Dunnett test (α=5%))
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): Not reported.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: Not reported. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes, the last algal growth inhibition test performed with the reference item K2Cr2O7 (June 11, 2018) indicates that the algae sensitivity is correct (within the accepted interval of 0.65 to 1.73 mg/L fixed by the International Standard NF EN ISO 8692 from Mai 2012 as mentioned in the OECD 201 Guideline) and in accordance with previous data obtained by the laboratory.
- ErC50 (0-72h) = 1.12 mg/L (1.04 – 1.20) - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For NOEC determination, statistical significance was determined with the Dunnett test (α=5%) from raw data with the scientific software Minitab 17.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (increase of biomass in control during 72h>16 fold; coefficient of variation of the mean specific growth rate among replicates in control (t0-t72)<7%; the mean of the replicate coefficients of variation in section-by-section growth rate in control < 35%)
- Conclusions:
- In an Alga Growth Inhibition Test with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata green algae, the growth rate inhibition effect concentrations were determined to be 72 h-ErC50 = 124 mg/L and 72 h-ErC10 = 22 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
An Algae Growth Inhibition Test was performed with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata green algae on the test substance over a period of 72 h in static conditions according to OECD Guideline 201, following GLP. OECD medium was used for algal culturing. In the previous solubility study the test item was found soluble in OECD medium and thus no vehicle was needed. In a preliminary range finding study the average growth inhibition rate were 6.6%, 5.3% and 45.1% at the tested concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, respectively. Based on these results, the definitive test was conducted with nominal test item concentrations of 0 (control), 3.2, 10, 32, 100 and 320 mg/L (factor of 3.2). Negative control consisted of test medium alone and potassium dichromate was used as reference substance.Three replicates were performed for each concentration of the test item, along with six replicates for the negative control group. A validated analytical method based on GC/FID was used to monitor the concentration and stability of the active ingredient in the test solution. The test item was considered as stable in the testing conditions after 72 hours of exposure as the measured concentrations in samples were maintained within ± 20 per cent of the measured initial concentration. All validity criteria were fulfilled. The percent inhibitions in average specific growth rate were 0.2, 4.5, 15.5, 42.9 and 78.4% and the percent inhibitions in yield were 1.0, 20.9, 55.1, 89.5 and 98.8% at the tested concentrations of 3.2, 10, 32, 100 and 320 mg/L respectively, when compared to the negative control. Based on these results, the growth rate inhibition effect concentrations were determined to be 72 h-ErC10 = 22 mg/L and 72 h-ErC50 = 124 mg/L, and the yield inhibition effect concentrations were 72h-EyC10 < 3.2 mg/L and 72h-EyC50 = 41 mg/L.
Reference
Table 1: pH values during the test
Nominal test item concentration (mg/L) |
pH |
|
At the start |
After 72 hours |
|
Control |
8.2 |
7.6 |
3.2 |
8.1 |
7.8 |
10 |
8.1 |
7.7 |
32 |
8.1 |
7.7 |
100 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
320 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
Table 2. Algal growth inhibition
Nominal test item concentration |
[algae] *104 /mL at 24 hours |
[algae] *104 /mL at 48 hours |
[algae] *104 /mL at 72 hours |
|||||||
Count. |
Average |
CV |
Count. |
Average |
CV |
Count. |
Average |
CV |
||
control |
a |
3,8 |
3,3 |
15,0 |
19,7 |
22,4 |
21,3 |
189,2 |
168,8 |
6,6 |
b |
2,8 |
24,1 |
168,8 |
|||||||
c |
3,8 |
30,0 |
171,2 |
|||||||
d |
2,9 |
24,5 |
158,6 |
|||||||
e |
3,5 |
18,3 |
160,3 |
|||||||
f* |
2,8 |
17,5 |
164,4 |
|||||||
3,2 |
a |
2,9 |
3.1 |
10.3 |
17,7 |
19.6 |
14.5 |
167,0 |
167.0 |
5.9 |
b |
3,5 |
22,9 |
176,8 |
|||||||
c |
3,0 |
18,3 |
157,2 |
|||||||
10 |
a |
3,2 |
3.1 |
5.6 |
22,7 |
20.1 |
12.2 |
126,5 |
133.7 |
5.3 |
b |
3,2 |
19,9 |
133,8 |
|||||||
c |
2,9 |
17,8 |
140,8 |
|||||||
32 |
a |
2,8 |
2.8 |
0.0 |
16,6 |
15.2 |
8.7 |
81,9 |
76.3 |
6.3 |
b |
2,8 |
14,0 |
73,6 |
|||||||
c |
2,8 |
14,9 |
73,5 |
|||||||
100 |
a |
2,2 |
2.2 |
6.8 |
6,9 |
6.6 |
8.8 |
19,3 |
18.7 |
3.8 |
b |
2,1 |
5,9 |
18,8 |
|||||||
c |
2,4 |
6,9 |
17,9 |
|||||||
320 |
a |
2,5 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2,8 |
2.7 |
14.8 |
3,4 |
3.0 |
13.3 |
b |
2,5 |
2,3 |
2,6 |
|||||||
c |
2,4 |
3,1 |
3,1 |
Table 3. Coefficients of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures
Control replicates |
Specific growth rate |
|||||||||||||
0-24h |
Average |
CV (%) |
24-48h |
Average |
CV (%) |
48-72h |
Average |
CV (%) |
0-72h |
Average |
CV per replicate (%) |
Average CV |
||
Control |
a |
1,335 |
1,174 |
12,7 |
1,646 |
1,914 |
12,2 |
2,262 |
2,038 |
10,6 |
1,748 |
1,709 |
27,0 |
29,9 |
b |
1,030 |
2,153 |
1,947 |
1,710 |
35,0 |
|||||||||
c |
1,335 |
2,066 |
1,742 |
1,714 |
21,4 |
|||||||||
d |
1,065 |
2,134 |
1,868 |
1,689 |
33,0 |
|||||||||
e |
1,253 |
1,654 |
2,170 |
1,692 |
27,2 |
|||||||||
f |
1,030 |
1,833 |
2,240 |
1,701 |
36,2 |
Table 4. Inhibitions of the average specific growth rate in comparison to the Control
Nominal test item concentration |
algae *104 /mL at 0 hours |
Specific |
Inhibition growth |
Average rate (%) |
Coefficient of |
Significance |
|
Control |
a |
1 |
1,748 |
Not applicable |
1.2 |
- |
|
b |
1,710 |
||||||
c |
1,714 |
||||||
d |
1,689 |
||||||
e |
1,692 |
||||||
f* |
1,701 |
||||||
3.2 |
a |
1 |
1,706 |
0,2 |
0,2 |
Not required |
ns |
b |
1,725 |
-0,9 |
|||||
c |
1,686 |
1,4 |
|||||
10 |
a |
1 |
1,613 |
5,6 |
4,5 |
* |
|
b |
1,632 |
4,5 |
|||||
c |
1,649 |
3,5 |
|||||
32 |
a |
1 |
1,468 |
14,1 |
15,5 |
* |
|
b |
1,433 |
16,2 |
|||||
c |
1,432 |
16,2 |
|||||
100 |
a |
1 |
0,987 |
42,3 |
42,9 |
* |
|
b |
0,978 |
42,8 |
|||||
c |
0,962 |
43,7 |
|||||
320 |
a |
1 |
0,408 |
76,1 |
78,4 |
* |
|
b |
0,319 |
81,4 |
|||||
c |
0,377 |
77,9 |
- : not relevant
ns : not significantly different compared to the Control. Dunnet test, α =0.05
* significantly different compared to the Control, Dunnett test, α=0.05
The equation of the regression (linear regression) is the following (rounded values):
% inhibition growth rate = - 0.9247 + 0.5280 [Test item concentration] - 0.000875 [Test item concentration]2
Table 5. Inhibitions of the yield in comparison to the Control
Nominal test item concentration |
[algae] *104 /mL at 0 hours |
[algae] *104 /mL at 72 hours |
Yield |
Average yield |
Yield inhibition (Iy) (%) |
||
Per |
Average/ |
||||||
Control |
a |
1 |
189,2 |
188,2 |
167,8 |
Not Applicable |
|
b |
168,8 |
167,8 |
|||||
c |
171,2 |
170,2 |
|||||
d |
158,6 |
157,6 |
|||||
e |
160,3 |
159,3 |
|||||
f* |
164,4 |
163,4 |
|||||
3.2 |
a |
1 |
167,0 |
166,0 |
166,0 |
1,0 |
1,0 |
b |
176,8 |
175,8 |
-4,8 |
||||
c |
157,2 |
156,2 |
6,9 |
||||
10 |
a |
1 |
126,5 |
125,5 |
132,7 |
25,2 |
20,9 |
b |
133,8 |
132,8 |
20,8 |
||||
c |
140,8 |
139,8 |
16,7 |
||||
32 |
a |
1 |
81,9 |
80,9 |
75,3 |
51,8 |
55,1 |
b |
73,6 |
72,6 |
56,7 |
||||
c |
73,5 |
72,5 |
56,8 |
||||
100 |
a |
1 |
19,3 |
18,3 |
17,7 |
89,1 |
89,5 |
b |
18,8 |
17,8 |
89,4 |
||||
c |
17,9 |
16,9 |
89,9 |
||||
320 |
a |
1 |
3,4 |
2,4 |
2,0 |
98,6 |
98,8 |
b |
2,6 |
1,6 |
99,0 |
||||
c |
3,1 |
2,1 |
98,7 |
The equation of the regression (linear regression) is the following (rounded values):
% Yield inhibition = 7.846 + 1.138 [Test item concentration] - 0.002673 [Test item concentration]2
Table 6: Conclusion on the chemical analysis
|
Concentration (mg test item / L) |
Deviation (%) |
|
Nominal test item concentration (mg/L) |
Initial time (T0h) |
Final time (T72h) |
|
control |
<1 |
<1 |
NA |
3.2 |
2.16 |
2.57 |
+19.0 |
100 |
78.6 |
77.5 |
-1.4 |
320 |
250 |
257 |
+2.8 |
According to the results, the measured concentrations of test item in samples were maintained within ± 20 per cent of the measured initial concentration. Consequently, the test item “P-MENTH-1-EN-8-OL was considered as stable in the testing conditions after 72 hours of exposure. Therefore, and in agreement with the guideline, concentrations were expressed in nominal test item concentration.
Description of key information
Key study. Test method according to OECD 201, GLP study. The growth rate inhibition effect concentrations to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata green algae were determined to be 72 h-ErC50 = 124 mg/L and 72 h-ErC10 = 22 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 124 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 22 mg/L
Additional information
Key study: An Algae Growth Inhibition Test was performed with Pseudokirchneriellasubcapitata green algae on the test substance over a period of 72 h in static conditions according to OECD Guideline 201, following GLP. OECD medium was used for algal culturing. In the previous solubility study the test item was found soluble in OECD medium and thus no vehicle was needed. In a preliminary range finding study the average growth inhibition rate were 6.6%, 5.3% and 45.1% at the tested concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, respectively. Based on these results, the definitive test was conducted with nominal test item concentrations of 0 (control), 3.2, 10, 32, 100 and 320 mg/L (factor of 3.2). Negative control consisted of test medium alone and potassium dichromate was used as reference substance.Three replicates were performed for each concentration of the test item, along with six replicates for the negative control group. A validated analytical method based on GC/FID was used to monitor the concentration and stability of the active ingredient in the test solution. The test item was considered as stable in the testing conditions after 72 hours of exposure as the measured concentrations in samples were maintained within ± 20 per cent of the measured initial concentration. All validity criteria were fulfilled. The percent inhibitions in average specific growth rate were 0.2, 4.5, 15.5, 42.9 and 78.4% and the percent inhibitions in yield were 1.0, 20.9, 55.1, 89.5 and 98.8% at the tested concentrations of 3.2, 10, 32, 100 and 320 mg/L respectively, when compared to the negative control. Based on these results, the growth rate inhibition effect concentrations were determined to be 72 h-ErC10 = 22 mg/L and 72 h-ErC50 = 124 mg/L, and the yield inhibition effect concentrations were 72h-EyC10 < 3.2 mg/L and 72h-EyC50 = 41 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.