Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03-22-2017 to 04-12-2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The temperature for the study was slightly higher than stated in the guideline. As no immobility in the blank control occurred during the test and all validity criteria were fulfilled, this deviation was stated as uncritical.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
no
Remarks:
Due to the test items properties, the study was performed without analytical determination of the test item.
Vehicle:
yes
Remarks:
Because of the very low solubility of the test item, acetone was used to spike the test solutions.
Details on test solutions:
During validation of the analytical method in spiked solutions at the concentration of 10 µg/L (taken as limit of water solubility) in test medium, no test item was detectable. That means solubility in test medium is much lower than in demineralised water. Development of an analytical method for measurement of test item in test medium was not possible.
Because test item is not measurable, in agreement with the OECD guidance document no. 23, no analytical determination of the test item in the test solutions was made in this study and the effects were based on nominal concentrations.

The solubility in water is stated as 10.48 µg/L (MSDS, provided by the sponsor). In this study, the limit of water solubility was used as highest concentrated treatment. Because of the very low solubility of the test item, acetone was used to spike the test solutions. Stock solutions containing 105 mg/L nominal concentration (real load 105 – 115 mg/L) and 5 mg/L of test item (prepared from the 105 mg/L stock solution) were prepared in acetone.
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
Species Daphnia magna
Variety STRAUS
Arrival of Strain 27. Sep. 2007
Sex female
Age between 0 and 24 hours
The animals which were used in the test did not belong to the first brood of the respective parent animals.

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
Daphnia magna is bred in the LAUS GmbH throughout the year. The animals were originally obtained from the Umweltbundesamt in Berlin and are kept for the use in toxicity tests. They multiply by parthenogenesis, thus being genetically identical. The husbandry is performed similar to the method described in the OECD guideline, following SOP 115 002 01 (“Zucht und Hälterung von Daphnia magna STRAUS“), edition 12, adopted 02. Feb. 2015.
Vessels glass beakers, nominal volume 2 L
Medium M4-Medium (recipe of ELENDT)
Food green alga (Desmodesmus subspicatus)
Medium renewal twice a week
Photo period 1 6/8 hours, using neon tubes
Temperature 20 +/-2 °C
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
21 d
Hardness:
267 - 356 mg CaCO3/L
Test temperature:
19.4 – 22.4°C
pH:
7.7 - 8.0
Dissolved oxygen:
8.5 - 9.5
Salinity:
Freshwater
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 0 - 5 - 10.5 µg/L
Details on test conditions:
Duration 21 days
Loading 80 mL/animal, animals were kept individually
Replicates 10 replicates/treatment
Treatments 10.5 and 5 µg/L
Blank Control dilution water
Solvent Control 100 µL acetone / L dilution water
Lighting 1000 Lux
Aeration none
Feeding unicellular green algae Desmodesmus subspicatus: 0.15 - 0.20 mg organic carbon/animal/day, the amount of carbon is based on photo metric measurement (linear cor-relation between absorption at 440 nm and measured DOC concentration).

Reference substance (positive control):
no
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
>= 10.5 µg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: No effect up to solubility limit
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
> 10.5 µg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Details on results:
Calculation of results was performed with the help of validated software (Microsoft Excel®). The estimation of the biological results was accomplished using the software Tox-Rat® Professional, version 3.2.1. The number of offspring in the solvent control was slightly higher than in the blank control but the difference between the control and the solvent control was not significant. Therefore, in agreement with the OECD guideline, for statistical evaluation, all blank control and solvent control replicates were pooled.

Table 1: Offspring

Replicate No.

Blank Control

Solvent Control

5 µg/L

10.5 µg/L

1

105

112

120

86

2

112

125

90

106

3

109

M

M

113

4

119

112

118

M

5

114

101

119

93

6

104

112

100

111

7

95

121

104

72

8

66

107

90

M

9

97

98

102

72

10

86

90

99

112

Mean

101

109

105

96

SD

16

11

12

17

RSD

16

10

11

18

SD = standard deviation;

RSD = relative standard deviation = coefficient of variation

M = mortality of parent animal

Table 2:     Fecundity

Treatment

Total Offspring

Surviving Parent Animals

Mean Offspring per Surviving Parent Animal

Blank Control

1007

10

101

Solvent Control

978

9

109

5 µg/L

942

9

105

10.5 µg/L

765

8

96

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
One valid experiment was performed according to OECD 211 Guideline in order to evaluate the effect of test item on the reproduction of Daphnia magna.

RESULTS:
Based on nominal concentrations,
NOEC = 10.5 µg/L
LOEC > 10.5 µg/L

VALIDITY CRITERIA:
All validity criteria were met.

PARAMETER DEMANDED VALUE FOUND VALUE
Mortality of parent animals in the blank control < 20 % 0 %
Mean surviving offspring in the blank control > 60 101
Mortality of parent animals in the solvent con-trol < 20 % 10 %
Mean surviving offspring in the solvent control > 60 109
O2 concentration > 3 mg/L = 8.5 mg/L
pH range 6 – 9 7.7 - 8.0
pH variation < 1.5°C 0.3°C
Temperature 18°C - 22°C, 19.4°C – 22.4°C
variation = 2.0 units variation of 3.0 units

The temperature and the range of the temperature was slightly higher than stated in the study plan (22.4 °C instead of 22.0°C, difference 3 °C instead of = 2.0 °C) . Because no mortality above the validity criteria and no abnormal behaviour was observed in the controls, this can be stated as uncritical.
Executive summary:

One valid experiment was performed according to OECD 211 Guideline in order to evaluate the effect of test item on the reproduction of Daphnia magna.

The solubility in water was considered as 10.48 µg/L (see OECD 105 study included in the present REACh dossier). In this study, the limit of water solubility was used as highest concentrated treatment. The study was performed using the concentrations 10.5 µg/L and 5 µg/L. Because of the very low solubility of the test item, acetone was used to spike the test solutions. Therefore a solvent control was prepared in addition to the blank control (solvent concentration: 0.1 mL/L).

For each control and test item treatment, ten daphnia were exposed for 21 days.

Medium renewal was performed every day to maximize exposure of the test organism to the test item. The offspring of the animals was counted every day.

Significant decrease in the reproduction of the daphnia was not observed in the treatments.

During validation of the analytical method in spiked solutions at the concentration of 10 µg/L (taken as limit of water solubility) in test medium, no test item was detectable. That means solubility in test medium is much lower than in demineralised water. Development of an analytical method for measurement of test item in test medium was not possible.

Because test item is not measurable, in agreement with the OECD guidance document no. 23, no analytical determination of the test item in the test solutions was made in this study and the effects were based on nominal concentrations.

 

The following results were determined for the test item:

NOEC >=10.5 µg/L
LOEC > 10.5 µg/L

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

One valid experiment was performed according to OECD 211 Guidelinein order to evaluate the effect of test item on the reproduction ofDaphnia magna.

The solubility in water was stated as 10.48 µg/L. In this study, the limit of water solubility was used as highest concentrated treatment. The study was performed using the concentrations 10.5 µg/L and 5 µg/L. Because of the very low solubility of the test item, acetone was used to spike the test solutions. Therefore a solvent control was prepared in addition to the blank control (solvent concentration: 0.1 mL/L). For each control and test item treatment, ten daphnia were exposed for 21 days. Medium renewal was performed every day to maximize exposure of the test organism to the test item. The offspring of the animals was counted every day.

Significant decrease in the reproduction of the daphnia was not observed in the treatments. It is concluded that no adversed effect was detected up to the water solubility limit of DPTH.