Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-921-8 | CAS number: 111-92-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
- HPRT (GLP-compliant study according to OECD 476): negative
- AMES (comparable to a NTP standard protocol): negative
- CA (similar to OECD 473): ambiguous
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
- Target gene:
- hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 media
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finder: 0; 40.41; 80.81; 161.6; 323.3; 646.5; 1293 µg/ml (with and without S9 mix)
Experiment 1: 0, 50, 100, 150, 240, 280, 320, 360 µg/ml (without S9 mix)
0, 80, 160, 240, 280, 400, 450, 525 µg/ml (with S9 mix)
Experiment 2: 0, 50, 100, 150, 250, 300, 320, 340, 360, 400, 450 µg/ml (without S9mix)
0, 100, 200, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 525, 550,600 µg/ml (with S9 mix) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: see remarks
- Remarks:
- 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide 0.10/0.15 µg/ml without S9 mix; benzo[a]pyrene 2.00/3.00 µg/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to induce forward mutation at the hprt locus in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells if:
1.The mutant frequency at one or more concentrations was significantly greater than that of the negative control (p≤ 0.05)
2.There was a significant concentration relationship as indicated by the linear trend analysis (p≤ 0.05)
3.The effects described above were reproducible. Results that only partially satisfied the assessment criteria described above were considered on a case-by-case basis. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance of mutant frequencies was carried out according to the UKEMS guidelines. The control log mutant frequency (LMF) was copared with the LMF from each treatment concentration and the data were checked for a linear trend in mutant frequency with test article treatment. These tests require the calculation of the heterogeneity factor to obtain a modified estimate of variance.
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment, six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of S-9 ranging from 40.41 to 1293 µg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM at the highest concentration tested). The highest concentration tested (1293 µg/mL) was not plated due to excessive toxicity and complete toxicity (0% RS) was observed at the highest concentration plated in the absence and presence of S-9 (646.5 µg/mL). The highest concentration to provide >10% RS was 323.3 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S-9, which gave 12% and 37% RS, respectively.
No marked changes in osmolality were observed in the Range-Finder at the highest concentration tested (1293 µg/mL) as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls (individual data not reported). Marked changes in pH were observed at 1293 µg/mL as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls but no marked changes were observed up to 646.5 µg/mL (individual data not reported). As no concentration tested in the Mutation Experiments was greater than 600 µg/mL no further measurements were performed. - Conclusions:
- A GLP-compliant study according to OECD 476 was performed. It is concluded that the test substance did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells when tested under the conditions employed in this study.
- Executive summary:
A GLP-compliant in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes according to OECD 476 was performed. In the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment, six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of rat S9 ranging from 40.41 to 1293 µg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM at the highest concentration tested). The highest concentration tested (1293 µg/mL) was not plated due to excessive toxicity and complete toxicity (0% RS) was observed at the highest concentration plated in the absence and presence of rat S9 (646.5 µg/mL). The highest concentration to provide >10% RS was 323.3 µg/mL in the absence and presence of rat S9, which gave 12% and 37% RS, respectively.
No marked changes in osmolality were observed in the Range-Finder at the highest concentration tested (1293 µg/mL) as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls (individual data not reported). Marked changes in pH were observed at 1293 µg/mL as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls but no marked changes were observed up to 646.5 µg/mL (individual data not reported). As no concentration tested in the Mutation Experiments was greater than 600 µg/mL no further measurements were performed.
In Experiment 1 ten concentrations, ranging from 50 to 500 µg/mL in the absence of rat S9 and from 80 to 600 µg/mL in the presence of rat S9, were tested. Seven days after treatment, the highest two concentrations tested in the absence of rat S9 (400 and 500 µg/mL) and the highest concentration tested in the presence of rat S9 (600 µg/mL) were considered too toxic for selection to determine viability and 6TG resistance. In addition, concentrations of 200 µg/mL in the absence of rat S9 and 320 and 360 µg/mL in the presence of rat S9 were not selected as there were sufficient non-toxic concentrations. All other concentrations were selected in the absence and presence of rat S9. The highest concentrations plated were 360 µg/mL in the absence of rat S9 and 525 µg/mL in the presence of rat S9, which gave 18% and 22% RS in the absence and presence of rat S9, respectively. Although no concentration tested in the presence of rat S9 gave the desired 10 to 20% RS the toxicity level observed at 525 µg/mL (22% RS) was sufficiently close to 10 to 20% RS to be considered acceptable and the data are therefore considered valid.
In Experiment 2 ten concentrations, ranging from 50 to 450 µg/mL in the absence of rat S9 and from 100 to 600 µg/mL in the presence of rat S9, were tested. Seven days after treatment all concentrations in the absence and presence of rat S9 were selected to determine viability and 6TG resistance. The highest concentrations tested, 450 µg/mL in the absence of rat S9 and 600 µg/mL in the presence of rat S9, gave 26% and 20% RS in the absence, respectively (seeTable8). It may be noted that in the absence of rat S9 a concentration of 400 µg/mL gave 20% RS and the data are therefore considered valid.
It is concluded that the test substance did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells when tested under the conditions employed in this study. These conditions included treatments up to toxic concentrations in two independent experiments in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S9).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Comparable to NTP standard protocol
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- according to Haworth et al. (1983): Environ. Mutagen. 5, Suppl. 1, 3-142
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Metabolic activation systems were derived from Arochlor-induced livers of male SD rats and male Syrian hamsters.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 100, 333.3, 1000, 3333.3, 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- sterility control
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: without S9: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA98 ); with S9: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 2 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Each trial consisted of triplicate plates and was done in a replicate. - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive if a reproducible dose related response over the solvent control was obtained .
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- An Ames-test, comparable to a NTP standard protocol, was performed. Under the conditions tested, no mutagenic activity was observed in any strain/activation combination. The positive controls showed the expected values.
- Executive summary:
An Ames-test, comparable to the NTP standard protocol, was performed. Four different strains (S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100) were tested with and without metabolic activation for 2 days (preincubation period: 20 min). The metabolic activation systems were derived from Arochlor-induced livers of male SD rats and male Syrian hamsters. Each trial consisted of triplicate plates and was done in a replicate. Under the conditions tested, no mutagenic activity was observed in any strain/activation combination. The positive controls showed the expected values.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- =< 0.2 mg/ml (max. effective concentration)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1 % ethanol, 0.5 % DMSO, saline
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation criteria (Ishidate and Odashima 1977): Spontaneous background aberrations of the solvent controls were about 3%.
Negative if =< 4.9 %
suspicious if 5 - 9.9 %
positive if >=10 % - Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test similar to OECD 473 was performed in Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU) cells without metabolic activation. At 0.2 mg/ml, 6 % of the cells showed chromosomal aberrations (gaps, breaks, and translocations) after 48 h. Therefore, results of this study were ambiguous concerning the genotoxicity of the test substance.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test similar to OECD 473 was performed in Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU) cells without metabolic activation. Three different doses were added to 3-day-old cultures. Chromosome preparations were made, as a rule at 24 and 48 h, or when necessary at 6 h, after the treatment. Cells were treated with colcemid (0.2 µg/ml) for 2 h, and after trypsinization, they were incubated in 0.075 M KCI hypotonic solution for 15 min at 37°C. The cells were fixed with ice-cold fixative (methanol:glacial acetic acid, 3:1 v/v) which was changed 3 times. A few drops of the suspension were then placed on clean dry slides which were held horizontally under an electric heater. The slides were stained with 1% Giemsa's buffered solution (pH 6.8) for 20 min. The number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was recorded on 100 well-spread metaphases at the magnification of 700.
At 0.2 mg/ml, 6 % of the cells showed chromosomal aberrations (gaps, breaks, and translocations) after 48 h. Therefore, results of this study were ambiguous concerning the genotoxicity of the test substance. The vehicle and untreated negative controls showed valid results.
Referenceopen allclose all
In Experiment 1 ten concentrations, ranging from 50 to 500 µg/mL in the absence of S‑9 and from 80 to 600 µg/mL in the presence of S‑9, were tested. Seven days after treatment, the highest two concentrations tested in the absence of S‑9 (400 and 500 µg/mL) and the highest concentration tested in the presence of S‑9 (600 µg/mL) were considered too toxic for selection to determine viability and 6TG resistance. In addition, concentrations of 200 µg/mL in the absence of S‑9 and 320 and 360 µg/mL in the presence of S‑9 were not selected as there were sufficient non-toxic concentrations. All other concentrations were selected in the absence and presence of S‑9. The highest concentrations plated were 360 µg/mL in the absence of S‑9 and 525 µg/mL in the presence of S‑9, which gave 18% and 22% RS in the absence and presence of S-9, respectively. Although no concentration tested in the presence of S-9 gave the desired 10 to 20% RS the toxicity level observed at 525 µg/mL (22% RS) was sufficiently close to 10 to 20% RS to be considered acceptable and the data are therefore considered valid.
In Experiment 2 ten concentrations, ranging from 50 to 450 µg/mL in the absence of S‑9 and from 100 to 600 µg/mL in the presence of S‑9, were tested. Seven days after treatment all concentrations in the absence and presence of S-9 were selected to determine viability and 6TG resistance. The highest concentrations tested, 450 µg/mL in the absence of S‑9 and 600 µg/mL in the presence of S‑9, gave 26% and 20% RS in the absence, respectively (seeTable8). It may be noted that in the absence of S‑9 a concentration of 400 µg/mL gave 20% RS and the data are therefore considered valid.
Experiment 1 (3 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||
|
%RS |
MF§ |
|
%RS |
MF§ |
||||
0 |
|
100 |
1.71 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
2.62 |
|
50 |
|
94 |
3.38 |
NS |
80 |
|
78 |
1.18 |
NS |
100 |
|
73 |
2.49 |
NS |
160 |
|
74 |
1.75 |
NS |
150 |
|
64 |
2.19 |
NS |
240 |
|
59 |
2.60 |
NS |
240 |
|
58 |
1.63 |
NS |
280 |
|
52 |
1.90 |
NS |
280 |
|
54 |
2.28 |
NS |
400 |
|
44 |
2.49 |
NS |
320 |
|
30 |
1.69 |
NS |
450 |
|
32 |
1.79 |
NS |
360 |
|
18 |
1.81 |
NS |
525 |
|
22 |
1.78 |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
||||||
NQO |
|
|
|
|
B[a]P |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
62 |
24.79 |
|
2 |
|
54 |
32.03 |
|
0.15 |
|
73 |
16.36 |
|
3 |
|
39 |
58.99 |
|
Experiment 2 (3 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||
|
%RS |
MF§ |
|
%RS |
MF§ |
||||
0 |
|
100 |
2.19 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
1.18 |
|
50 |
|
97 |
1.55 |
NS |
100 |
|
94 |
1.36 |
NS |
100 |
|
90 |
1.55 |
NS |
200 |
|
81 |
1.45 |
NS |
150 |
|
82 |
2.76 |
NS |
300 |
|
69 |
2.42 |
NS |
250 |
|
51 |
3.65 |
NS |
350 |
|
65 |
3.61 |
NS |
300 |
|
54 |
2.46 |
NS |
400 |
|
68 |
4.32 |
NS |
320 |
|
47 |
5.65 |
NS |
450 |
|
52 |
2.67 |
NS |
340 |
|
58 |
0.60 |
NS |
500 |
|
34 |
1.51 |
NS |
360 |
|
45 |
4.60 |
NS |
525 |
|
35 |
2.02 |
NS |
400 |
|
20 |
3.06 |
NS |
550 |
|
25 |
2.98 |
NS |
450 |
|
26 |
2.54 |
NS |
600 |
|
20 |
2.45 |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
* |
||||||
NQO |
|
|
|
|
B[a]P |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
86 |
12.51 |
|
2 |
|
39 |
25.22 |
|
0.15 |
|
58 |
15.93 |
|
3 |
|
18 |
26.40 |
|
§ 6-TG resistant mutants/106viable cells 7 days after treatment
%RS Percent relative survival adjusted by post treatment cell counts
NS Not significant
*, **, *** Test for linear trend: χ2(one-sided), significant at 5%, 1% and 0.1% level respectively
TA1535
Dose |
No Activation |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
10% RLI |
||||||
ug/Plate |
Mean±SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
||||||
0 |
11 |
2.2 |
29 |
4.6 |
12 |
2.4 |
14 |
1.8 |
6 |
1.5 |
15 |
2 |
100 |
17 |
2 |
22 |
4.5 |
10 |
1 |
16 |
1.5 |
9 |
1.7 |
20 |
3.4 |
333.3 |
16 |
1.7 |
26 |
0.6 |
12 |
2 |
19 |
1.2 |
10 |
2.2 |
16 |
2.4 |
1000 |
15 |
2.3 |
23 |
2.4 |
14 |
2 |
10 |
2.2 |
12 |
3 |
15 |
3.5 |
3333.3 |
17 |
0.7 |
20 |
0.7 |
11 |
2.3 |
17 |
1.8 |
8 |
2 |
15 |
1.5 |
10000 |
15s |
2.8 |
27 |
2.2 |
10 |
3.8 |
10 |
1.9 |
15s |
7.3 |
16 |
1.7 |
Positive Control |
413 |
7.4 |
433 |
9.9 |
258 |
6.2 |
401 |
10.6 |
151 |
1.5 |
210 |
6 |
TA100
Dose |
No Activation |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
10% RLI |
||||||
ug/Plate |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
||||||
0 |
128 |
4.7 |
123 |
3.5 |
125 |
7.5 |
92 |
4.5 |
115 |
7.5 |
109 |
8.9 |
100 |
120 |
9.1 |
110 |
8 |
121 |
4.3 |
108 |
5.2 |
130 |
3.3 |
123 |
4.8 |
333.3 |
107 |
1.9 |
94 |
11.2 |
128 |
1 |
114 |
10.7 |
124 |
1.3 |
113 |
11 |
1000 |
119 |
7.7 |
103 |
10.5 |
129 |
3.8 |
96 |
1.8 |
126 |
12.2 |
109 |
7.8 |
3333.3 |
111 |
8 |
104 |
18.7 |
115 |
0.9 |
107 |
7.6 |
121 |
6.9 |
112 |
9.7 |
10000 |
117 |
7.7 |
110 |
8.8 |
115 |
5.7 |
100 |
8.1 |
116 |
5.6 |
118 |
10.7 |
Positive Control |
484 |
9.6 |
520 |
8 |
1526 |
17.3 |
1511 |
44.1 |
839 |
28.5 |
498 |
19.2 |
TA98
Dose |
No Activation |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
10% RLI |
||||||
ug/Plate |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
||||||
0 |
36 |
5.2 |
37 |
1.3 |
40 |
4.3 |
47 |
4.5 |
44 |
2.6 |
44 |
2.3 |
100 |
39 |
1.7 |
23 |
1.7 |
41 |
0.9 |
47 |
2.9 |
41 |
2.3 |
37 |
2 |
333.3 |
36 |
9.1 |
40 |
6.1 |
44 |
0.9 |
46 |
2.5 |
46 |
2.7 |
28 |
4.6 |
1000 |
35 |
3.1 |
24 |
2.9 |
44 |
2.3 |
38 |
0.6 |
38 |
0.7 |
36 |
3.5 |
3333.3 |
39 |
7.4 |
28 |
1.2 |
36 |
2 |
34 |
2.7 |
37 |
3.7 |
35 |
1.8 |
10000 |
30 |
4.8 |
34 |
3.3 |
32s |
3.5 |
39 |
0.9 |
31 |
1 |
31 |
1.9 |
Positive Control |
436 |
30.4 |
472 |
14.2 |
1208 |
12.7 |
1391 |
32.4 |
839 |
12.5 |
570 |
53.5 |
TA1537
Dose |
No Activation |
No Activation |
10% HLI |
10% HLI |
10% RLI |
10% RLI |
||||||
ug/Plate |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
||||||
0 |
9 |
0.3 |
9 |
1.5 |
7 |
1 |
20 |
0.6 |
10 |
2 |
16 |
1.8 |
100 |
7 |
1.2 |
8 |
0.6 |
10 |
1.2 |
14 |
1.5 |
7 |
0 |
18 |
2.7 |
333.3 |
8 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
20 |
3.2 |
7 |
0.9 |
12 |
1.7 |
1000 |
8 |
1.2 |
6 |
1.2 |
17 |
3.9 |
17 |
1.3 |
9 |
1.3 |
18 |
1.3 |
3333.3 |
11 |
1.7 |
8 |
0.3 |
11 |
1.9 |
14 |
2.5 |
7 |
2.5 |
12 |
2.1 |
10000 |
8t |
2 |
12 |
2.3 |
16 |
3.6 |
12 |
2.7 |
7 |
2 |
14 |
4 |
Positive Control |
178 |
18.6 |
286 |
38.5 |
308 |
21.4 |
281 |
16.3 |
313 |
37 |
157 |
4.2 |
Abbreviations:
RLI
= induced male Sprague Dawley rat liver S9
HLI = induced male Syrian hamster liver S9
s = Slight Toxicity; p = Precipitate; x = Slight Toxicity and
Precipitate; T = Toxic; c = Contamination
Under the conditions tested, no mutagenic activity was observed in any strain/activation combination in the bacterial AMES-Test. The positive controls showed the expected values.
At 0.2 mg/ml, 6 % of the cells
showed chromosomal aberrations (gaps, breaks, and translocations) after
48 h.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
- Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test (GLP-compliant study according to OECD 474): negative
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Remarks:
- DRF included in same report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Inc., Frederick, MD
- Age at study initiation: 6-8weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 27.4-35.8g (males) and 24.5-30.6g (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: 5 of the same sex per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina certified rodent chow 5002 ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days at least
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23.3°C (74°F)
- Humidity (%): 50+/-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
- Supplier: Super G - Details on exposure:
- gavage at constant volume of 20 ml/kg.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 5 mice/group were sacrified at 24, 48 and 72 hours (All 5 mice treated with Cyclophosphamide were sacrified at 24h).
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 55 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 110 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 220 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Vehicle control n=15 per sex
55 mg/kg n=15 per sex
110 mg/kg n=15 per sex
220 mg/kg n=20 per sex
Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg n=5 per sex - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): commonly used
- Doses / concentrations: 60 mg/kg in distilled water
- Supplier: Sigma Chemical Company - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow from femurs
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Slides were fixed in methanol and colored with may-Grünwald-Giemsa.
- Evaluation criteria:
- 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were scored for the presence of micronuclei.
The mean incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes must not exceed 5/1000 polychromatic erythrocytes (0.5%) in the vehicle control.
The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the positive control group must be significantly increased relative to the vehicle control group (p<0.05). - Statistics:
- Kastenbaum-Bowman
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - Mortality: 3/20 males and 1/20 females treated at 220 mg/kg died on the day of exposure.
- Clinical signs: noted on the days following dose administration, included lethargy in male and female mice at 55, 110, and 220 mg/kg.
- Reductions up to 19 % in the ration of polychromatic erythrocytes per total erythrocytes were observed. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes in the dibutylamine treated grouop was not statistically increased relative to the respective negative controls.
Cyclophosphamide induced a significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in both male and female mice (p<0.05). - Conclusions:
- A GLP-compliant in vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test was performed according to OECD TG 474 in male/female ICR mice. The test substance was found to be negative regarding the endpoint genotoxicity.
- Executive summary:
An in vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test was performed according to OECD TG 474 (GLP-compliant) in male/female ICR mice. Treatment with the test substance was once orally via gavage at constant volume of 20 ml/kg. 5 mice per group were sacrified at 24, 48 and 72 hours (All 5 mice treated with Cyclophosphamide were sacrified at 24h). Results show that 3/20 males and 1/20 females treated at 220 mg/kg died on the day of exposure. Clinical signs on the days following dose administration, included lethargy in male and female mice at 55, 110, and 220 mg/kg were noted. Reductions up to 19 % in the ration of polychromatic erythrocytes per total erythrocytes were observed. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes in the test substance treated group was not statistically increased relative to the respective negative controls. Cyclophosphamide induced a significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in both male and female mice (p<0.05).
However, the test substance was found to be negative regarding the endpoint genotoxicity.
Reference
Summary of bone marrow micronucleus study
Treatment | Sex | Time (h) | Number of mice | PCE/total erythrocytes | Micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes | |
Number per 1000 PCE | Number per PCE scored | |||||
corn oil 20ml/kg | M | 24 | 5 | 0,53 | 0,8+/-0,84 | 4/5000 |
48 | 5 | 0,58 | 1,4+/-1,14 | 7/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,57 | 0,8+/-0,84 | 4/5000 | ||
F | 24 | 5 | 0,7 | 2,0+/-1,00 | 10/5000 | |
48 | 5 | 0,59 | 1,0+/-0,71 | 5/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,61 | 1,2+/-0,84 | 6/5000 | ||
Bi-n-butylamine 55mg/kg | M | 24 | 5 | 0,54 | 0,6+/-0,55 | 3/5000 |
48 | 5 | 0,58 | 1,0+/-1,41 | 5/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,65 | 1,2+/-0,84 | 6/5000 | ||
F | 24 | 5 | 0,72 | 2,6+/-1,82 | 13/5000 | |
48 | 5 | 0,48 | 1,2+/-0,84 | 6/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,62 | 0,6+/-0,89 | 3/5000 | ||
Bi-n-butylamine 110mg/kg | M | 24 | 5 | 0,52 | 0,2+/-0,45 | 1/5000 |
48 | 5 | 0,65 | 1,0+/-0,71 | 5/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,56 | 1,4+/-2,07 | 7/5000 | ||
F | 24 | 5 | 0,66 | 0,0+/-0,00 | 0/5000 | |
48 | 5 | 0,51 | 1,8+/-0,84 | 9/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,66 | 0,8+/-0,84 | 4/5000 | ||
Bi-n-butylamine 220mg/kg | M | 24 | 5 | 0,52 | 0,8+/-0,84 | 4/5000 |
48 | 5 | 0,63 | 1,8+/-1,30 | 9/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,57 | 1,4+/-1,14 | 7/5000 | ||
F | 24 | 5 | 0,59 | 2,6+/-2,61 | 13/5000 | |
48 | 5 | 0,49 | 0,6+/-0,89 | 3/5000 | ||
72 | 5 | 0,56 | 1,0+/-0,71 | 5/5000 | ||
Cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg | M | 24 | 5 | 0,54 | 17,4+/-3,21 | 87/5000* |
F | 24 | 5 | 0,46 | 34,4+/-2,41 | 172/5000* |
p<0.05
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro studies:
A GLP-compliant in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes according to OECD 476 showed that the test substance did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells and is therefore negative in that assay (2010, K1).
The test substance was tested for mutagenicity using the Salmonella/microsome preincubation assay using the standard protocol approved by the National Toxicology Program. The test substance was tested at doses of 0.10, 0.33, 1.0, 3.3, and 10 mg/plate in as many as 5 Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA97, TA98, and TA100) in the presence and absence of rat or hamster liver S-9. The test substance was negative in these tests and the highest ineffective dose tested in any Salmonella typhimurium strain was 10.000 mg/plate (1986, K2). Further studies with limited information or significant
methodological deficiencies showed also negative results in the ames test (1958, K3; 1977, K3; 1977, K4; 1978, K4; 1977, K4).
In a publication an in vitro cytogenetics assay using Chinese hamster cells the test substance in ethanol (1% solution) caused chromatid gaps, chromatid or chromosomal breaks and translocations in 6% of cells and showed therefore ambiguous results (1977, K2). An increase in the frequency of chromosomal breaks was also observed in a further publication at a concentration of 1 mM. The number of breaks per cell was 0.12 vs. 0.03, 0.02, and 0.03 for the control with saline, ethanol, and acetone (1977, K3). In the same publication a slight increase in the SCE rate was also observed, but not considered substance-related (5.83 and 7.08, respectively, vs. 3.36, 3.68, and 3.41 in the controls) (1977, K4). Another study with significant methodological deficiencies showed also a positive result in an UDS test (1977, K3).
In vivo studies:
A GLP-compliant in vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test was performed according to OECD TG 474 in male/female ICR mice. 20 male/female animals per group were orally administered single doses of 0, 55, 110 and 220 mg/kg bw. Mortality occurred among high-dose males (3/20) and females (1/20), and lethargy was observed in both males and females of all treatment groups. While treated mice exhibited slight reductions in polychromatic erythrocytes to erythrocyte ratios (up to 19%) relative to vehicle control (corn oil) animals, there was no significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at 24, 48 or 72-hour post-treatment examination in either male or female treated mice when compared to controls (1995, K1). Two further in vivo studies with limited information or significant methodological deficiencies showed negative test results (1981, K3; 1978, K4). The positive result in another in vivo study was considered false-positive by the author (1978, K4). In a further study, the test substance was only tested in combination with sodium nitrite. This combination was found to be positive in that in vivo assay (1996, K3).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Several Ames-tests (OECD 471), with or without metabolic activation through S9-Mix, a HPRT forward mutation assay (OECD Guideline 476), a chromosomal aberration assay (OECD Guideline 473), and a valid in vivo Test (OECD Guideline 475) were performed to test for a mutagenic effects. Therefore, the available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. No adverse findings on genotoxicity was observed in the valid in-vitro or in-vivo studies. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008,as amended for the thirteenth time in Regulation (EC) No 2018/1480.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.