Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-849-4 | CAS number: 100-41-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
No long-term toxicity test data were available with fish for ethylbenzene.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A chronic fish toxicity study for ethylbenzene is not available. However there is a large amount of supporting evidence which suggests that the value is predictable, and that testing is not strictly required.
Ethylbenzene, based on its structure, is expected to exhibit toxicity through a non-polar narcotic mode of action (Verhaar et al., 1992). This suggests that the toxicity between the three aquatic trophic levels (fish, daphnia and algae) is not expected to vary significantly. Acute toxicity data are available which supports this assumption and, of the acute toxicity data available, fish were found to be the least sensitive trophic level (most sensitive LC50 = 4.2 mg/L, for Oncorhynchus mykiss, compared to EC50s of 1.8, 3.2 and 3.6 mg/L for Daphnia magna, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Selenastrum capricornutum, respectively).
Chronic toxicity data are available for invertebrates (NOEC = 1 mg/L, Ceriodaphnia dubia) and algae (NOEC = 3.4 mg/L,Selenastrum capricornutum). There is little variation of toxicity between both the chronic and acute toxicity data and the two chronic endpoints of these species, representing two trophic levels.
Chronic toxicity has also been predicted using a QSAR (Nabholz et al., 2009) and shows a good correlation with the measured data. The predicted 30-day ChV (chronic value) endpoint for fish is 1.13 mg/L, which lies within the range of the two measured chronic toxicity values for invertebrates and algae. The chronic endpoints for invertebrates and algae have also been predicted with a high degree of accuracy (0.908 and 2.242 mg/L, respectively).
Finally, acute:chronic ratios (ACRs) for substances with non-polar narcotic modes of action have generally been found to be low. An average ACR of these substances for studies mainly conducted on invertebrates was found to be 2.58 (Roex et al., 2000). An ACR calculated for ethylbenzene was 1.91. The chronic toxicity of ethylbenzene to fish, predicted using this ACR is 2.20 mg/L. It was noted that ACRs for fish were generally more variable than those for invertebrates, and hence less reliable. The 50thand 95thpercentile of ACRs for a range of non-polar narcotic substances which were calculated for a mixture of invertebrates and fish were 4.10 and 17.0, respectively (ECETOC, 2003). Toluene – a substance similar in structure to ethylbenzene – had an ACR of 8.1, based on 11 acute toxicity results and two chronic toxicity results. Given that the ACR of ethylbenzene for invertebrates was found to be lower than the average, and that a structurally similar substance had an ACR significantly lower than the 95thpercentile of ACRs for a range of substances and species, it can be assumed that the ACR of ethylbenzene for fish will be lower than this 95thpercentile, and an absolute worst case value for chronic fish toxicity can be calculated to be 0.25 mg/L.
Therefore, the testing of this endpoint is not scientifically necessary as there is strong evidence to suggest that chronic toxicity to fish is predictable and will lie in the range of 0.25-3.4 mg/L.
References
Verhaar HJM, Van Leeuwen CJ, Hermens JLM. 1992. Classifying Environmental Pollutants. Chemosphere, 25 (4) 471-391.
Nabholz V, Mayo-Bean K. 2009.ECOSAR v1.00, EPIWIN v4.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Roex EWM, Van Gestel CAM, Van Wezel AP, Van Straalen NM. 2000.Ratios between Acute Aquatic Toxicity and Effects on Population Growth Rates in Relation to Toxicant Mode of Action. Env. Tox. and Chem. 19 (3) 685-693.
ECETOC. 2003. Technical Report Number 91. ECETOC
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.