Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-802-7 | CAS number: 696-99-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Oct. 2014 - Feb. 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Gouvernment of the United Kingdom
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (benzylamine)trifluoroboron
- EC Number:
- 211-802-7
- EC Name:
- (benzylamine)trifluoroboron
- Cas Number:
- 696-99-1
- Molecular formula:
- C7H9BF3N
- IUPAC Name:
- (benzylamine)trifluoroboron
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- agglomerated powder
- Details on test material:
- - Lot/batch No.: 05-23851
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine-, tryptophan-
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: rfa-, uvrB-, R factor plasmid pKM101 (TA98 and TA100)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: uvrA-
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver microsomal preparation (S9-mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate for experiment 1
50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate for experiment 2 - Vehicle / solvent:
- dimethyl sulphoxide
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- untreated
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethyl sulphoxide
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG), 9-Aminoacridine (9AA), 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO), 2-Aminoanthracene (2AA) and Benzo(a)pyrene (BP)
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG), 9-Aminoacridine (9AA), 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO), 2-Aminoanthracene (2AA) and Benzo(a)pyrene (BP)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Overnight sub-cultures of the appropriate coded stock cultures were prepared in nutrient broth and incubated at 37 °C for approximately 10 hours. Each culture was monitored spectrophotometrically for turbidity with titres determined by viable count analysis on nutrient agar plates.
The test item was accurately weighed and approximate half-log dilutions prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide on the day of each experiment. Formulated concentrations were adjusted to allow for the stated impurity content (5%) of the test item. Prior to use, the solvent was dried to remove water using molecular sieves.
The S9 Microsomal fraction was prepared in house from male rats. Prior to use, each batch of S9 was tested for its capability to activate known mutagens in the Ames test.
Experiment 1:
Eight concentrations of the test item (1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate), appropriate positive, vehicle and negative controls, and each bacterial strain, was assayed with and without S9 mix using triplicate plates. All of the plates were incubated at 37 °C± 3 °C for approximately 48 hours.
Experiment 2:
Five concentrations of the test item (50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate), appropriate positive, vehicle and negative controls, and each bacterial strain, was assayed with and without S9 mix using triplicate plates. All of the plates were incubated at 37 °C± 3 °C for approximately 48 hours, pre-incubation time was 20 min. - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
5. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Experiment 1:
All of the plates were scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Several manual counts were required due to bubbles in the base agar slightly distorting the actual plate count.
Experiment 2:
All of the plates were scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Several manual counts were required, predominantly due to interference in the base agar e.g. marks on the base of the plates slightly distorting the counts.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. In the first experiment (plate incorporation method) there was no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) and consequently the same maximum dose level was used in the second mutation test. Second experiment (pre-incubation method) results once again showed no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of S9-mix. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in Experiment 2 (pre incubation method).
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experiment 1 – Without Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 03 February 2015 |
To: 06 February 2015 |
||||||||||
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
108 107 107 |
(107) 0.6# |
11 15 15 |
(14) 2.3 |
31 45 19 |
(32) 13.0 |
31 32 31 |
(31) 0.6 |
11 13 15 |
(13) 2.0 |
||
1.5 µg |
112 98 106 |
(105) 7.0 |
16 15 17 |
(16) 1.0 |
27 24 24 |
(25) 1.7 |
37 32 33 |
(34) 2.6 |
16 16 11 |
(14) 2.9 |
||
5 µg |
98 116 98 |
(104) 10.4 |
11 12 15 |
(13) 2.1 |
33 21 21 |
(25) 6.9 |
15 20 16 |
(17) 2.6 |
8 16 16 |
(13) 4.6 |
||
15 µg |
104 111 106 |
(107) 3.6 |
15 16 13 |
(15) 1.5 |
25 28 28 |
(27) 1.7 |
25 29 17 |
(24) 6.1 |
16 9 8 |
(11) 4.4 |
||
50 µg |
104 99 95 |
(99) 4.5 |
8 16 17 |
(14) 4.9 |
28 32 35 |
(32) 3.5 |
27 29 17 |
(24) 6.4 |
4 16 16 |
(12) 6.9 |
||
150 µg |
84 99 106 |
(96) 11.2 |
16 12 12 |
(13) 2.3 |
25 23 27 |
(25) 2.0 |
32 35 29 |
(32) 3.0 |
16 11 5 |
(11) 5.5 |
||
500 µg |
102 122 108 |
(111) 10.3 |
17 17 13 |
(16) 2.3 |
39 25 19 |
(28) 10.3 |
36 25 31 |
(31) 5.5 |
15 11 5 |
(10) 5.0 |
||
1500 µg |
120 92 90 |
(101) 16.8 |
12 13 12 |
(12) 0.6 |
24 20 23 |
(22) 2.1 |
16 31 32 |
(26) 9.0 |
8 16 12 |
(12) 4.0 |
||
5000 µg |
90 118 112 |
(107) 14.7 |
17 12 16 |
(15) 2.6 |
25 29 29 |
(28) 2.3 |
16 32 35 |
(28) 10.2 |
7 12 15 |
(11) 4.0 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||
Dose Level |
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
No. of Revertants |
345 373 377 |
(365) 17.4 |
351 325 222 |
(299) 68.2 |
373 421 437 |
(410) 33.3 |
164 162 156 |
(161) 4.2 |
869 1017 794 |
(893) 113.5 |
Experiment 1 – With Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 03 February 2015 |
To: 06 February 2015 |
||||||||||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
110 115 118 |
(114) 4.0# |
12 15 13 |
(13) 1.5 |
37 41 40 |
(39) 2.1 |
24 24 27 |
(25) 1.7 |
11 11 9 |
(10) 1.2 |
||
1.5 µg |
104 119 110 |
(111) 7.5 |
13 8 11 |
(11) 2.5 |
41 24 35 |
(33) 8.6 |
29 24 25 |
(26) 2.6 |
8 12 16 |
(12) 4.0 |
||
5 µg |
119 108 109 |
(112) 6.1 |
13 13 8 |
(11) 2.9 |
27 15 40 |
(27) 12.5 |
25 25 13 |
(21) 6.9 |
11 8 11 |
(10) 1.7 |
||
15 µg |
98 114 107 |
(106) 8.0 |
11 9 11 |
(10) 1.2 |
43 40 40 |
(41) 1.7 |
23 25 28 |
(25) 2.5 |
12 12 7 |
(10) 2.9 |
||
50 µg |
98 96 110 |
(101) 7.6 |
13 12 9 |
(11) 2.1 |
23 32 37 |
(31) 7.1 |
29 24 19 |
(24) 5.0 |
12 7 9 |
(9) 2.5 |
||
150 µg |
120 94 92 |
(102) 15.6 |
8 8 15 |
(10) 4.0 |
25 25 31 |
(27) 3.5 |
24 29 24 |
(26) 2.9 |
15 9 8 |
(11) 3.8 |
||
500 µg |
119 82 122 |
(108) 22.3 |
12 7 11 |
(10) 2.6 |
40 39 39 |
(39) 0.6 |
24 29 32 |
(28) 4.0 |
8 13 8 |
(10) 2.9 |
||
1500 µg |
105 122 119 |
(115) 9.1 |
12 15 11 |
(13) 2.1 |
25 25 29 |
(26) 2.3 |
24 24 29 |
(26) 2.9 |
12 9 13 |
(11) 2.1 |
||
5000 µg |
123 99 116 |
(113) 12.3 |
8 14 11 |
(11) 3.0 |
32 35 37 |
(35) 2.5 |
29 33 29 |
(30) 2.3 |
16 9 11 |
(12) 3.6 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
Dose Level |
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
No. of Revertants |
966 1010 1155 |
(1044) 98.9 |
253 204 219 |
(225) 25.1 |
170 151 148 |
(156) 11.9 |
152 147 148 |
(149) 2.6 |
238 273 254 |
(255) 17.5 |
Experiment 2 – Without Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 09 February 2015 |
To: 12 February 2015 |
||||||||||
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
86 64 78 |
(76) 11.1# |
15 17 23 |
(18) 4.2 |
20 19 16 |
(18) 2.1 |
25 25 24 |
(25) 0.6 |
15 19 13 |
(16) 3.1 |
||
50 µg |
64 84 64 |
(71) 11.5 |
17 13 21 |
(17) 4.0 |
23 23 21 |
(22) 1.2 |
8 16 19 |
(14) 5.7 |
9 27 19 |
(18) 9.0 |
||
150 µg |
72 102 83 |
(86) 15.2 |
12 24 27 |
(21) 7.9 |
23 13 12 |
(16) 6.1 |
31 12 29 |
(24) 10.4 |
15 21 16 |
(17) 3.2 |
||
500 µg |
80 78 76 |
(78) 2.0 |
12 20 13 |
(15) 4.4 |
16 11 13 |
(13) 2.5 |
16 17 15 |
(16) 1.0 |
8 15 24 |
(16) 8.0 |
||
1500 µg |
72 78 68 |
(73) 5.0 |
11 9 12 |
(11) 1.5 |
11 24 28 |
(21) 8.9 |
19 27 19 |
(22) 4.6 |
7 8 13 |
(9) 3.2 |
||
5000 µg |
80 80 94 |
(85) 8.1 |
21 7 11 |
(13) 7.2 |
17 19 17 |
(18) 1.2 |
12 12 13 |
(12) 0.6 |
12 13 7 |
(11) 3.2 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||
Dose Level |
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
No. of Revertants |
1947 1489 1070 |
(1502) 438.6 |
1511 1303 1113 |
(1309) 199.1 |
597 524 520 |
(547) 43.3 |
202 186 230 |
(206) 22.3 |
461 730 819 |
(670) 186.4 |
Experiment 2 – With Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 09 February 2015 |
To: 12 February 2015 |
||||||||||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
79 108 107 |
(98) 16.5# |
15 13 15 |
(14) 1.2 |
32 17 19 |
(23) 8.1 |
19 19 24 |
(21) 2.9 |
16 8 8 |
(11) 4.6 |
||
50 µg |
84 90 112 |
(95) 14.7 |
9 12 12 |
(11) 1.7 |
32 35 31 |
(33) 2.1 |
8 13 17 |
(13) 4.5 |
8 16 12 |
(12) 4.0 |
||
150 µg |
72 96 87 |
(85) 12.1 |
9 7 9 |
(8) 1.2 |
33 32 20 |
(28) 7.2 |
19 16 16 |
(17) 1.7 |
17 12 11 |
(13) 3.2 |
||
500 µg |
80 86 91 |
(86) 5.5 |
11 12 9 |
(11) 1.5 |
32 31 37 |
(33) 3.2 |
17 20 24 |
(20) 3.5 |
12 8 9 |
(10) 2.1 |
||
1500 µg |
90 95 68 |
(84) 14.4 |
9 9 9 |
(9) 0.0 |
32 21 21 |
(25) 6.4 |
16 13 17 |
(15) 2.1 |
16 12 13 |
(14) 2.1 |
||
5000 µg |
94 95 83 |
(91) 6.7 |
8 9 15 |
(11) 3.8 |
25 23 25 |
(24) 1.2 |
24 16 17 |
(19) 4.4 |
7 12 5 |
(8) 3.6 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
Dose Level |
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
No. of Revertants |
1088 1057 1010 |
(1052) 39.3 |
182 176 176 |
(178) 3.5 |
95 94 151 |
(113) 32.6 |
104 136 138 |
(126) 19.1 |
246 293 283 |
(274) 24.8 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Based on the study result, (benzylamine)trifluoroboron is considered to be non-mutagenic and therefore classification is not warranted according to the criteria of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. - Executive summary:
Salmonella typhimuriums trains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were treated with the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 mg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was amended, following the results of Experiment 1, and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate.
The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method).
Therefore, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic without and with S9 mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.