Registration Dossier

Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017/10/20
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE
MpBpWin (US EPA, 2000)

2. MODEL (incl. version number)
v.4.13

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CCc1cc(CC)c2Sc3ccccc3C(=O)c2c1

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
Please refer to the attached QMRF report

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
Please refer to the attached QPRF report
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSAR R.6
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Software tool(s) used including version: EPIWIN v.4.1
- Model(s) used: MpBpWIN v.1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information' and 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information' and 'Attached justification'
Type of method:
other: QSAR prediction according to Modified Grain Method
Specific details on test material used for the study:
not applicable
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0 mm Hg
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
The results calculated by MpBpWin according to the Modified Grain Method using the measured boiling point of 423.7°C and melting point of 72.8°C.

SMILES : CCc1cc(CC)c2Sc3ccccc3C(=O)c2c1

CHEM :

MOL FOR: C17 H16 O1 S1

MOL WT : 268.38

------------------------ SUMMARY MPBPWIN v1.43 --------------------

Boiling Point: 397.65 deg C (Adapted Stein and Brown Method)

Melting Point: 282.48 deg C (Adapted Joback Method)

Melting Point: 118.53 deg C (Gold and Ogle Method)

Mean Melt Pt : 200.50 deg C (Joback; Gold,Ogle Methods)

Selected MP: 151.32 deg C (Weighted Value)

Vapor Pressure Estimations (25 deg C):

(Using BP: 423.70 deg C (user entered))

(Using MP: 72.80 deg C (user entered))

VP: 1.01E-007 mm Hg (Antoine Method)

: 1.35E-005 Pa (Antoine Method)

VP: 7.75E-007 mm Hg (Modified Grain Method)

: 0.000103 Pa (Modified Grain Method)

VP: 1.54E-006 mm Hg (Mackay Method)

: 0.000205 Pa (Mackay Method)

Selected VP: 7.75E-007 mm Hg (Modified Grain Method)

: 0.000103 Pa (Modified Grain Method)

Subcooled liquid VP: 2.19E-006 mm Hg (25 deg C, Mod-Grain method)

: 0.000292 Pa (25 deg C, Mod-Grain method)

The result of the modified grain method without entering measured values is 4.9E-7 mm Hg.

Conclusions:
The following result was obtained: 7.75E-007 mm Hg (0.000103 Pa) (Modified Grain Method).
Executive summary:

The vapour pressure was predicted with the QSAR MpBpWin v1.43 (US EPA, 2000). The measured boiling point of 423.7°C and measured melting point of 72.8°C were entered for the prediction. The following result was obtained: 7.75E-007 mm Hg (0.000103 Pa) (Modified Grain Method).

Description of key information

vapour pressure at 25°C [predicted with MpBpWin v1.43 (US EPA, 2000)]: 7.75E-007 mm Hg (0.000103 Pa) [Modified Grain Method; the measured boiling point of 423.7°C and measured melting point of 72.8°C were entered for the prediction]

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Vapour pressure:
0 Pa
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The vapour pressure was predicted with the QSAR MpBpWin v1.43 (US EPA, 2000). The measured boiling point of 423.7°C and measured melting point of 72.8°C were entered for the prediction.

A reliability score of 2 was assigned, in accordance with the criteria for assigning data quality in line with the principles described by Klimisch (1997) and ECHA`s Practical guide [How to use and report (Q)SARs, Version 3.1, July 2016] that defines a maximum of 2.