Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from July 18, 2002 to Oct. 07, 2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
other: In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid
EC Number:
248-502-0
EC Name:
2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid
Cas Number:
27503-81-7
Molecular formula:
C13H10N2O3S
IUPAC Name:
2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid

Method

Target gene:
Chromosomal aberations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
a liver homogenate fraction (S9) from Aroclor 1254 treated male rats
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.33 mM, 3.3 mM, and 10 mM in the tests with 24 hours of treatment without a metabolic activation system,
1.0 mM, 3.3 mM, and 10 mM in the tests with 3.5 hours of treatment with and 4 hours of treatment without a metabolic activation system.
Vehicle / solvent:
distilled water
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
distilled water
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
0.5 µg/ml
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
without s9
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
25 µg/ml
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
with s9
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Test system:
Lymphocyte cultures
Samples of human peripheral blood were obtained by venipuncture from a male healthy donor, who was not undergoing any drug treatment and collected in heparinised vessels. Lymphocyte cultures were established by addition of small inocula of whole blood (0.4 ml) to each culture tube containing 5 ml of Ham's F10 complete medium, to which 0.1 ml of phytohaemagglutinin was added. The tubes were sealed and incubated at 37 °C.
Metabolic Activation System
The rat liver homogenate fractions used were obtained from King & Hamasch GmbH (Lot KH1501)S Kirchzarten. The preparation of the 9000g supernatant of liver homogenates (S9) from Sprague Dawley male rats (8-10 weeks old, Harlan Winkelman, D-33176 Borchen) induced with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight) is in accordance with the method recommended by Ames et al. (1975).
The S9 preparations (in 0.15 M KC1) were stored in liquid nitrogen.
S9-mix containing 25% S9 was freshly prepared for each mutagenicity assay. The concentrations of the cofactors in the S9-mix are: NADP, 4 mM; glucose-6-phosphate, 25 mM, MgCl2, 8 mM; KC1, 33 mM; phosphate buffer pH 7*4, 100 mM. This solution is filter sterilized by passage through a 0.2 µm filter. S9-mix was kept on ice.
Evaluation criteria:
A significant increase of mutant cells by the test compound will be stated, when the frequency of cells with aberrations in the concurrent negative controls and the frequency of cells with aberrations at each dosage level differ significantly.
Statistics:
The statistical significance was determined according to the methods of Kastenbaum and Bowman (1970).

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
other: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The highest concentration tested induced 69% (1st exp., 24h) and 27 % cytotoxicity (2nd exp., 4h) in the absence and 58 % (1st exp.) and 52 % (2nd exp.) cytotoxicity in the presence of S9-mix.
Test substance did not induce any increase in the number of chromosome aberrations in cultured human blood lymphocytes in the absence and presence of a metabolizing system.
Remarks on result:
other:

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on the results of this study, test article did not cause clastogenic effects in human peripheral blood lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation system.
Executive summary:

The chromosome aberration study was undertaken to examine the mutagenic effect of test article for its capability to induce chromosome damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro. All tests were carried out both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system. Two independent experiments were performed. A sampling time at 1.5 times the normal cell-cycle length from the beginning of the treatment (24 h) was used in the first and second experiment. The two experiments without S9-mix differ in the duration of the exposure to the test substance. In the first experiment the cells were treated in the absence of S9 for 24 hours with the test compound, whereas in the second experiment without S9 the test compound was washed away 4 hours after the start of the treatment. In the test with a metabolic activation system, the cells were always exposed to the test substance for 3.5 hours. The following concentrations of test article were tested: 0.33 mM, 3.3 mM, and 10 mM in the tests with 24 hours of treatment without a metabolic activation system 1.0 mM, 3.3 mM, and 10 mM in the tests with 3.5 hours of treatment with and 4 hours of treatment without a metabolic activation system.

At the concentrations tested, the test article did not induce any increase in the number of chromosome aberrations in cultured human blood lymphocytes in the absence and presence of a metabolizing system. In conclusion, the results indicate that, under the experimental conditions described, the test article was not mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test with human peripheral blood lymphocytes.