Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-098-3 | CAS number: 85650-88-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Based on the results obtained from an OECD 471 compliant study, it is concluded that the test item is non-mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test up to the highest tested concentration of 5 mg/plate under the test conditions chosen.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-12-20 to 2018-03-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Both trials (plate incorporation and pre-incubation) were performed at concentrations of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 mg/plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: recommended by guideline - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 4 µg/plate, all strains with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
- Cell density at seeding: 10^8 viable cells per plate
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 min
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs +/- 30 min (plate incorporation);
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background lawn - Rationale for test conditions:
- According to guideline and based on preliminary dose-range finding study.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation:
A substance is considered positive if the following criteria apply:
There should be a dose related increase over the range tested and/or a reproducible increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing doses of the test item either in the presence or absence of the metabolic activation system.
The test will be judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response is equal to or greater than 2 times the mean vehicle control value in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 or equal to or greater than 3 times the mean vehicle control value in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537.
The mutation test is considered acceptable as it met the following criteria:
- All tester strains confirmed to their genetic characteristics.
- The positive controls showed increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice or thrice the concurrent vehicle control levels with the appropriate bacterial strain. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
- Evaporation from medium: no
- Water solubility: well soluble
- Precipitation: not observed
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes - Conclusions:
- Based on the results obtained from this study, it is concluded that the test item is non-mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test up to the highest tested concentration of 5 mg/plate under the test conditions chosen.
- Executive summary:
The test item was evaluated for mutagenicity in a Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test according to OECD guideline for testing of chemicals No. 471, “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, adopted on 21st July 1997.
The test concentrations used in the mutation assay were selected based on the results obtained in the pre-tests. The mutagenic potential of the test item was investigated in two independent experiments, in plate incorporation test (trial 1) and pre-incubation test (trial 2). Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (± S9 mix). Both trials were performed at concentrations of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 mg/plate. All concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. Vehicle control (distilled water) and appropriate positive controls (2-nitrofluorene, sodium azide and 9-Aminoacridine, Mitomycin C for trials without metabolic activation and 2-Aminoanthracene for trials with metabolic activation) were tested simultaneously.
The tester strains used in the mutation assay were Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA 102, TA1535 and TA1537.
In the performed trials all of the validity criteria regarding the investigated strains, negative (vehicle) and positive controls, S9 activity and number of investigated analyzable concentration levels were fulfilled. Based on the experimental results obtained, the mean numbers of revertant colonies at the tested concentrations were comparable to those of the vehicle control, in both trials in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. There was no substantial increase in number of revertant colonies at any of the tested concentrations in both trials. In the performed experiments an inhibitory effect of the test item (decreased number of revertant colony numbers and/or affected background lawn development) was not observed in any case.
The number of revertant colonies in the positive controls resulted in 2.2 to 16.1 fold increase under identical conditions.
Reference
Table 1 SUMMARY OF COLONY COUNTS OF REVERTANTS OF TRIAL-I: Plate Incorporation Method
Treatment |
Test Concentration (mg/plate) |
No. of Revertants (Mean of 3 Plates) |
|||||||||||
With S9 |
|
Without S9 |
|||||||||||
Salmonella typhimurium |
Salmonella typhimurium |
||||||||||||
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
||||
Vehicle Control |
100 µL of Distilled water |
Mean |
25.3 |
102.3 |
255.3 |
20.3 |
8.3 |
23.0 |
110.0 |
256.7 |
20.7 |
8.7 |
|
±SD |
2.5 |
6.1 |
7.8 |
3.5 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
10.6 |
5.9 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
Test item |
0.05 |
Mean |
19.7 |
97.0 |
257.3 |
18.7 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
98.3 |
253.3 |
19.7 |
6.3 |
|
±SD |
3.5 |
8.9 |
8.5 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
6.5 |
5.7 |
0.6 |
3.2 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
0.16 |
Mean |
23.0 |
97.0 |
252.7 |
20.7 |
9.3 |
19.0 |
96.3 |
254.7 |
15.7 |
9.3 |
||
±SD |
3.6 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
1.5 |
2.3 |
3.6 |
5.1 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
0.5 |
Mean |
20.7 |
106.0 |
254.0 |
20.0 |
7.7 |
18.0 |
97.7 |
258.7 |
17.3 |
6.3 |
||
±SD |
5.0 |
6.1 |
7.5 |
2.6 |
1.5 |
2.6 |
5.7 |
5.5 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
1.6 |
Mean |
22.7 |
106.0 |
256.0 |
20.0 |
9.0 |
20.3 |
99.0 |
255.0 |
19.7 |
8.3 |
||
±SD |
4.2 |
7.8 |
2.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
7.5 |
4.6 |
4.0 |
2.5 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
5 |
Mean |
21.3 |
107.3 |
253.3 |
19.7 |
7.7 |
19.7 |
104.7 |
257.3 |
18.3 |
8.3 |
||
±SD |
2.5 |
4.2 |
6.1 |
1.5 |
3.1 |
2.5 |
11.6 |
7.5 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
Positive Control |
100 µL of respective Positive Control |
Mean |
375.7 |
406.0 |
602.3 |
146.0 |
119.3 |
354.3 |
392.0 |
597.0 |
142.0 |
115.7 |
|
±SD |
14.3 |
6.6 |
10.1 |
8.9 |
3.5 |
14.5 |
9.5 |
7.0 |
7.5 |
6.0 |
|||
Fold Increase |
14.8 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
7.2 |
14.3 |
15.4 |
3.6 |
2.3 |
6.9 |
13.3 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
Table 2SUMMARY OF COLONY COUNTS OF REVERTANTS OF TRIAL-II: Preincubation Method
Treatment |
Test Concentration (mg/plate) |
No. of Revertants (Mean of 3 Plates) |
|||||||||||
With S9 |
|
Without S9 |
|||||||||||
Salmonella typhimurium |
Salmonella typhimurium |
||||||||||||
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
||||
Vehicle Control |
100 µL of Distilled water |
Mean |
27.0 |
106.0 |
269.0 |
22.7 |
9.3 |
22.0 |
98.0 |
269.3 |
19.0 |
7.3 |
|
±SD |
4.4 |
5.6 |
12.5 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
4.6 |
8.7 |
11.5 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
1-(carboxylatomethyl)methylpyridinium |
0.05 |
Mean |
25.3 |
98.3 |
260.3 |
19.3 |
9.3 |
20.3 |
102.3 |
253.0 |
19.0 |
7.3 |
|
±SD |
3.1 |
5.7 |
9.7 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
8.5 |
7.0 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
0.16 |
Mean |
22.7 |
105.3 |
263.0 |
20.7 |
10.7 |
20.7 |
104.0 |
269.7 |
17.0 |
6.0 |
||
±SD |
3.8 |
8.6 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
3.6 |
11.7 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
0.5 |
Mean |
23.0 |
97.7 |
262.0 |
20.7 |
9.7 |
20.0 |
97.0 |
259.7 |
19.0 |
6.0 |
||
±SD |
1.7 |
4.2 |
9.8 |
4.5 |
1.5 |
3.6 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
1.6 |
Mean |
25.7 |
98.0 |
266.3 |
18.7 |
7.0 |
20.7 |
95.3 |
255.0 |
16.3 |
5.7 |
||
±SD |
2.5 |
8.5 |
11.8 |
4.5 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
6.8 |
8.2 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|||
Fold Increase |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
5 |
Mean |
23.3 |
101.7 |
262.7 |
18.0 |
6.0 |
21.3 |
99.0 |
269.7 |
16.0 |
5.7 |
||
±SD |
2.5 |
4.0 |
10.7 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
3.1 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
2.6 |
1.5 |
|||
Fold Increase |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
|||
Positive Control |
100 µL of respective Positive Control |
Mean |
373.3 |
396.0 |
605.0 |
144.3 |
118.3 |
348.0 |
395.7 |
592.0 |
139.3 |
118.3 |
|
±SD |
7.5 |
8.2 |
7.5 |
12.1 |
6.7 |
6.2 |
7.5 |
15.9 |
9.3 |
5.0 |
|||
Fold Increase |
13.8 |
3.7 |
2.2 |
6.4 |
12.7 |
15.8 |
4.0 |
2.2 |
7.3 |
16.1 |
|||
Lawn Intensity |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
4+ |
Positive controls:
With S9:
For Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 = 4 µg/plate of 2-Aminoanthracene
Without S9:
For TA98: 2 µg/plate of 2-Nitrofluorene
For TA100 and TA1535: 1 µg/plate of Sodium azide.
For TA102: 0.5 µg/plate of Mitomycin C
For TA1537: 50 µg/plate of 9-Aminoacridine
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Ames Test
The test item was evaluated for mutagenicity in a Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test according to OECD guideline for testing of chemicals No. 471, “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, adopted on 21st July 1997.
The test concentrations used in the mutation assay were selected based on the results obtained in the pre-tests. The mutagenic potential of the test item was investigated in two independent experiments, in plate incorporation test (trial 1) and pre-incubation test (trial 2). Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (± S9 mix). Both trials were performed at concentrations of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and5 mg/plate. All concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. Vehicle control (distilled water) and appropriate positive controls (2-nitrofluorene, sodium azide and 9-Aminoacridine, Mitomycin C for trials without metabolic activation and 2-Aminoanthracene for trials with metabolic activation) were tested simultaneously.
The tester strains used in the mutation assay were Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA 102, TA1535 and TA1537.
In the performed trials all of the validity criteria regarding the investigated strains, negative (vehicle) and positive controls, S9 activity and number of investigated analyzable concentration levels were fulfilled.Based on the experimental results obtained, the mean numbers of revertant colonies at the tested concentrations were comparable to those of the vehicle control, in both trials in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. There was no substantial increase in number of revertant colonies at any of the tested concentrations in both trials.In the performed experiments an inhibitory effect of the test item (decreased number of revertant colony numbers and/or affected background lawn development) was not observed in any case.
The number of revertant colonies in the positive controls resulted in 2.2 to 16.1 fold increase under identical conditions.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification,
Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The
available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on
available data the test item is not classified as genotoxic according to
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the tenth time in
Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.