Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26 May - 08 Jun 1998
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
GLP compliance:
yes
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
At each sampling time portions (15 mL) were removed and duplicate aliquots (2 mL) diluted to volume (10 mL) with acetonitrile:water (3:1 v/v) and analysed for AERO® 5100 Promoter by high performance liquid chromatography.
Buffers:
Buffer solutions were prepared using the following volumes:

pH 4.0: 0.2 M glacial acetic acid (410 mL) and 0.2 M sodium acetate (90 mL) were added to purified water (500 mL) and the pH was measured.
Measured pH = 3.97.
pH 7.0: Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (3.4 g) was dissolved in purified water (900 mL), 1M sodium hydroxide (15 mL) was added and the pH was measured. The volume was adjusted to 1000 mL with purified water.
Measured pH = 7.02.
pH 9.0: Disodium tetraborate decahydrate (16.6 g) and potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (1.81 g) were dissolved in purified water (900 mL) and the pH was measured. The volume was adjusted to 1000 mL with purified water.
Measured pH = 9.02.
The pH of the buffer solutions were measured using a pH meter.
Duration:
5 d
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
243.4 mg/L
Remarks:
Mean of two replicates
Duration:
5 d
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
251.7 mg/L
Remarks:
Mean of two replicates
Duration:
5 d
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
249.5 mg/L
Remarks:
Mean of two replicates
Number of replicates:
2
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
no
Preliminary study:
There was no significant change in the concentration of AERO® 5100 Promoter with less than 10% when incubated in pH 4, 7 and 9 buffer solutions at 50 °C.
Transformation products:
not measured
% Recovery:
97.82
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
% Recovery:
96.9
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
% Recovery:
97.8
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
Details on results:
As the degree of hydrolytic degradation of AERO® 5100 Promoter was less than 10% after 5 days (equivalent to an environmental half-life of greater than 1 year) further study of the degradative behaviour of AERO® 5100 Promoter was not necessary. AERO® 5100 Promoter is hydrolytically stable under acidic, neutral and basic conditions.

Table 1: Preliminary investigation results for hydrolysis

pH 4

Time (hours)

Concentration, Ct(mg/L)

Mean Ct(mg/L)

Ln Ct

0

242.4, 244.4

243.4

5.495

2.4

241.9, 242.9

242.4

5.491

24

239.9, 239.1

239.5

5.479

48

241.2,242.0

241.6

5.487

120

237.9, 238.3

238.1

5.473

Exponential regression, ln Ct= 5.491 - 0.000150t. At 120 hours, concentration = 98% of initial

pH 7

Time (hours)

Concentration, Ct(mg/L)

Mean Ct(mg/L)

Ln Ct

0

252.1,251.2

251.7

5.528

2.4

249.8, 249.9

249.9

5.521

24

242.2,243.1

242.7

5.492

48

247.0, 246.9

247.0

5.509

120

243.6,244.1

243.9

5.497

Exponential regression, ln Ct= 5.517 - 0.000198t. At 120 hours, concentration = 97% of initial

pH 9

Time (hours)

Concentration, Ct(mg/L)

Mean Ct(mg/L)

Ln Ct

0

249.7, 249.3

249.5

5.519

2.4

247.2, 246.8

247.0

5.509

24

242.4, 241.2

241.8

5.488

48

246.8, 246.0

246.4

5.507

120

245.0, 242.9

244.0

5.497

Ct = concentration of test item at time t

Table 2: pH during hydrolysis test

Nominal pH

Test

Temperature (°C)

pH

Initial

Final

4

Preliminary

50

3.97

3.96

7

Preliminary

50

7.00

7.03

9

Preliminary

50

9.01

9.07

Description of key information

DT50: approx. 1 year at 25 °C under environmental conditions (OECD 111)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

One experimental study is available investigating the hydrolytic stability of the substance (Cytec Industries, 1998). The study was performed according to OECD 111 (GLP). In accordance with the guideline a preliminary test was performed at three different pH levels (4, 7 and 9) and 50 °C. Two replicates for each pH level with a concentration of approx. 240 - 250 mg/L were incubated for 5 days. At the end of exposure the test substance concentrations were analytically determined followed by analytical determination (HPLC/UV). After incubation for five days a recovery of 96.9 - 97.82% of the initial concentration was found at pH 4, 7 and 9 (50 °C). In accordance with the guideline this result indicates that the substance is hydrolytically stable under environmental conditions with a DT50 of approx. 1 year at 25 °C.