Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 423-300-7 | CAS number: 128554-52-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on generations indicated in Effect levels (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 9 February 2009 to 19 March 2009
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study data over 12 years old provided by ECHA, on a previously notified substance considered comparable and suitable for read-across use for the substance being registered (see attachments for justification of read-across). Study was performed according to OECD and EU guidelines and according to GLP principles.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- On Day 11 post-coitum animal 71 (Group 3) delivered. Evaluation: This animal’s data were excluded from calculation, because her first mating date was missed and thus was not dosed according to the appropriate schedule. Sufficient data were available from other animals.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 423-300-7
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 128554-52-9
- Molecular formula:
- Molecular formula varies for each reaction product. See section 1.2 for the molecular formula for each identified reaction product.
- IUPAC Name:
- 12-hydroxy-N-({3-[(12-hydroxyoctadecanamido)methyl]phenyl}methyl)octadecanamide
- Reference substance name:
- AMIDE#71
- IUPAC Name:
- AMIDE#71
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): AMIDE #71
- Substance type: White powder
- Physical state: solid
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:WI(Han)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 10-13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 187-250 grams (day 0 post-coitum)
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing:
Pre-mating During acclimatization, females were housed in groups of 5 animals/cage in Macrolon cages (MIV type, height 18 cm).
Mating Females were caged together with males on a one-to-one-basis in Macrolon cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). During the weekend, mating procedures were suspended and the animals were housed in groups of maximum 5 animals/sex/cage in Macrolon cages (MIV type, height 18 cm).
Post-coitum Females were individually housed in Macrolon cages (MIII type, height 18 cm).
General Sterilized sawdust as bedding material and paper as cage-enrichment was supplied.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days prior to pairing under laboratory conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.1 - 21.8
- Humidity (%): 29 - 79
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Formulations (w/w) were prepared daily within 6 hours prior to dosing and were homogenized to a visually acceptable level. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle (1.036) and not for the test substance.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Based on trial formulations performed at NOTOX
- Concentration in vehicle: 10, 40 and 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: not specified in terms of days, but until successful pairing
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility: not applicable.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: not applicable
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear, referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No analytical method based on gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (HPLC), UV spectrophotometry or total organic carbon analysis (TOC) could be developed for the determination of the test substance in formulations with propylene glycol (determined during NOTOX Project 482838 - 90 day study).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From Day 6 to Day 19 post-coitum, inclusive
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 50, 200, 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on results of a dose range finding study
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes (mortality/viability check)
- Time schedule: twice daily (early morning/late afternoon)
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: At least once daily from Day 0 post-coitum onwards
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:Days 0, 3 and 6-20 (daily) post-coitum
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined: Days 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-17 and 17-20 post-coitum
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day: Day 20 post-coitum
- Organs examined: External, thoracic and abdominal organs.
OTHER:
Organ weights: Spleen weights (and terminal body weight) were recorded from 10 pregnant animals of all dose groups on the scheduled day of necropsy. Previous results from a 28 day study indicated spleen parameters should be examined due to macroscopic and histological findings.
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Litter observations:
- - External examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Head examinations: Yes: [aproximately half per litter]
Other:
- The number and distribution of live and dead fetuses
- The number and distribution of embryo-fetal deaths
- The weight of each fetus
- The sex of each fetus from the ano-genital distance (during necropsy)
and also from gonadal inspections (during further fetal examination) - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze the data:
- If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (Dunnett, 1955) (many-to-one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups for each sex.
- The Steel-test (Miller, 1981) (many-to-one rank test) was applied if the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- The Fisher Exact-test (Fisher 1950) was applied to frequency data.
Mean litter proportions (percent per litter) of total fetal malformations and developmental variations (external, visceral, skeletal and combined), and each particular external, visceral and skeletal malformation or variation was subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test (Kruskal and Wallis 1952) to determine intergroup differences. If the ANOVA revealed statistically significant (p<0.05) intergroup variance, Dunn’s test (Dunn 1964) was used to compare the compound-treated groups to the control group.
All tests were two-sided and in all cases p < 0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of significance. - Reproductive indices:
- For each dose group reproduction parameters were expressed in two ways:
-As a mean (with standard deviation) of the number observed for each litter
-As a mean litter proportion calculated on a total group basis - Offspring viability indices:
- For each litter the following calculations were performed:
Pre-implantation loss (Number of corpora lutea - number of implantation sites) / Number of corpora lutea x 100
Post-implantation loss (Number of implantation sites - number of live fetuses) / Number of implantation sites x 100
The fetal developmental findings were summarized by: 1) presenting the incidence of a given finding both as the number of fetuses and the number of litters available for examination in the group; and 2) considering the litter as the basic unit for comparison, calculating the number of affected fetuses as a mean litter proportion on a total group basis.
Where:
Viable Fetuses Affected/Litter (%) = (No. Viable Fetuses Affected/Litter) / No. Viable Fetuses/Litter x 100
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
There were 23, 20, 16 and 22 females pregnant and used for calculation in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respecitvely. Once control female had resorptions only.
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal toxicity
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no toxicologically signficant effects
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
There were no treatment related effects on litter size for any group.
Sex ratio:
The male:female sex ratios of each treatment group were unaffected by treatment.
Fetal body weight:
The was no effecty on fetal body weights.
External malformations and variations:
No test substance related effects on fetal external morphology, visceral morphology, skeletal morpholgy.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no toxicologically signficant effects
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Maternal findings
No maternal toxicity was observed in the 50, 200 and 1000 mg/kg/day groups.
Developmental findings
No developmental toxicity was observed in the 50, 200 and 1000 mg/kg/day groups.
Based on the results in this prenatal developmental toxicity study the maternal, reproductive and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for AMIDE #71 was established as being at least 1000 mg/kg body weight/day. - Executive summary:
Summary
A prenatal developmental toxicity study of AMIDE#71 in rats by oral gavage.
Ninety-six mated female Wistar Han rats were assigned to four dose groups. The test item was administered once daily by gavage from Day 6 to 19 post-coitum inclusive, at doses of 50, 200 and 1000mg/kg/day(Groups 2, 3 and 4 respectively). The rats of the control group received the vehicle, propylene glycol, alone. Females were checked daily for the presence of clinical signs. Food consumption of females was determined at periodic intervals; body weight was determined daily during treatment and at periodic intervals in the other periods.
All animals surviving to Day 20 post-coitum were subjected to an examination post-mortem and external, thoracic and abdominal macroscopic findings were recorded. A laparohysterectomy was performed on each surviving female of the groups. The uteri, placentae and ovaries were examined, and the numbers of fetuses, early and late resorptions, total implantations and corpora lutea were recorded. Gravid uterine weights were recorded, and net body weights and net body weight changes were calculated. The fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external, visceral and skeletal malformations and developmental variations. All live fetuses were euthanised. One half of the fetuses were decapitated and the heads were fixed in Bouin's fixative, all fetuses were dissected and examined for visceral anomalies and subsequently fixed in 96% aqueous alcohol and stained with Alizarin Red S for skeletal examinations.
Results
Accuracy, homogeneity and stability of formulations were not demonstrated by analyses as no analytical method could be developed for gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (HPLC), UV spectrophotometry or total organic carbon analysis (TOC).
Maternal findings
No maternal toxicity was observed in the 50, 200 and 1000 mg/kg/day groups.
Development findings
No developmental toxicity was observed in the 50, 200 and 1000 mg/kg/day groups.
Conclusion
Based on the results in the prenatal developmental toxicity study the maternal, reproductive and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for AMIDE#71 was established as being at least 1000 mg/kg body weight/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.