Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994-09-12 to 1994-10-20
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The study was performed prior to LLNA implementation.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
C18 (branched) fatty acids, esters with mono-, di-, and tri-glycerol
EC Number:
701-479-5
Molecular formula:
C42H82O7
IUPAC Name:
C18 (branched) fatty acids, esters with mono-, di-, and tri-glycerol
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Hostacerin DGI; Synonym: Fettsaeurepolyglycerinester
- Physical state: Liquid, light yellow
- Lot/batch No.: E06 213955
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: End of August 1996
- Storage condition of test material: in the dark at room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright-White
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
100% / 0.5 mL
Day(s)/duration:
Test item applied three times (6 hour duration each), i.e. at day 1, day 8 and day 15
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
20% /0.5 mL
Day(s)/duration:
Day 29/6 hour dermal challenge followed by macroscopic assessment on day 30 and day 31
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
Pretest: 2 animals/dose concentration (i. e. 6 animals total)
Control group: 10 animals
Treatment group: 20 animals
Challenge controls:
The control group was exposed to an ethanol : water (80 : 20) mixture only. Challenge treatment was carried out with 20 % test substance in acetone

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
aceton (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20 % test item in Aceton
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
aceton (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20 % test item in Aceton
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the results of this study the test substance registered showed no evidence for sensitizing properties and thus is not subject for labeling requirements with regard to skin sensitization.
Executive summary:

In order to test for possible skin sensitizing effects, the test substance was investigated in a guinea pig skin sensitization test according to Buehler. 20 Pirbright-White guinea pigs in the treatment group and 10 animals in the control group were used. Dermal induction was performed using 100 % test item. The control group was exposed to an ethanol : water (80 : 20) mixture only. Challenge treatment was carried out with 20 % test substance in acetone. Under the test conditions of the present study, none of the 20 animals of the treatment group showed a positive skin response after the challenge procedure (sensitization incidence = %).

Based on the results of this study the test substance registered showed no evidence for sensitizing properties and thus is not subject for labeling requirements with regard to skin sensitization.